Pegasystems PEGACPRSA22V1 Certified Pega Robotics System Architect 22 Exam Practice Test

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

According to the Pega Robotic Automation Asset Management and Studio Guide:

“Robotic automation assets are reusable components—such as automations, global scripts, adapters, and configuration items—that are shared across multiple robotic projects. Assets enable organizations to maintain consistency and streamline project development.”

The documentation elaborates:

• “Assets streamline the development process across the enterprise by reducing duplication of work.”

• “Shared automation assets ensure consistency of development, coding standards, and project structure across teams and projects.”

• “Assets are version-controlled and centrally stored in the Pega Robot Manager or Deployment Portal for reuse.”

It also clarifies that assets are not customizable after download because they are version-controlled and used as read-only components, ensuring enterprise-wide standardization.

Therefore:

Option A — True (Assets streamline enterprise development).

Option C — True (Assets ensure consistency across projects).

Option B — Incorrect (Assets are not designed for post-download modification).

Option D — Incorrect (Assets reduce development time, not increase it).

References (Exact Extract Source):

Pega Robotics Studio User Guide – Robotic Automation Assets and Asset Management

Pega Academy – Robotics System Architect Certification Course (Asset Sharing and Reusability)

Pega Robot Manager – Asset Lifecycle and Governance Overview

Final Verified Answer: A, C

In Pega Robot Studio, an environment override allows developers to configure multiple deployment environments (such as test, staging, and production) using a single project. This helps you avoid creating separate projects for each environment and ensures consistent automation logic while dynamically switching between environment-specific settings at runtime.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Managing Environment Overrides and Multi-Environment Deployments”:

“Environment overrides provide a mechanism to define environment-specific configuration values for applications within a project.

For example, the same automation logic can be used for both test and production systems by creating separate environment override files — one for the test environment and one for the production environment — each specifying unique paths, credentials, or URLs for the corresponding system.”

Detailed Reasoning:

The HR system has different access points for test and production, which typically means different URLs or executable paths.

The automation logic (how the robot interacts with the HR application) remains identical; only the connection configuration changes.

Therefore, instead of creating multiple applications or modifying logic, you configure two environment override files — one for production and one for test — each defining environment-specific details such as:

Application path (for Windows adapters)

StartPage URL (for web adapters)

Credentials or runtime parameters

This allows a single automation project to adapt dynamically based on which environment override is active during deployment or testing.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — A single override cannot contain two sets of environment details; each override corresponds to one environment.

B. Incorrect — Creating two applications increases complexity and redundancy; both would duplicate the same logic.

C. Incorrect — Adding both separate applications and overrides is unnecessary; overrides alone are sufficient for environment flexibility.

D. Correct — Two environment overrides (one for production, one for test) allow the same project and automation logic to function properly across both environments.

Therefore, the correct answer is D. Create two environment overrides for the HR System project: one override for production, and one for test.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, when interrogating Java applications, sometimes a child process is created separately from the main application process. In such cases, controls in the child process cannot be detected unless the adapter is configured to attach to child processes as well.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Java Application Integration and Child Processes”:

“For Java applications that spawn additional processes, set the HookChildProcesses property of the adapter to True.

This enables the adapter to attach to both the main process and any child processes created by the parent application, allowing interrogation and automation of controls within those secondary windows.”

Detailed Reasoning:

HookChildProcesses ensures that when a Java application spawns a new process (such as a popup or a grid), Pega Robotics attaches to and monitors that process.

Without enabling this property, the adapter would only recognize the primary Java process, leaving controls in secondary processes unrecognized.

Option Analysis:

A. HookChildProcesses: Correct. Allows interrogation of child processes.

B. EnableMatchInProcess: Incorrect. Used for controlling object matching within the same process context.

C. TargetPath: Incorrect. Defines executable location for adapters.

D. IgnoreMainBrowser: Incorrect. Related to web adapters, not Java applications.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

During interrogation of web applications, developers often encounter dynamic or hidden controls — such as drop-down menus or hover-triggered lists — that do not immediately appear on the page.

To successfully interrogate these elements, Pega Robot Studio provides two essential tools:

The Delay option on the Interrogation Form, which allows the developer time to trigger the hidden control before capture.

The Select Element option, which enables precise selection of an element directly from the DOM, even if it is not immediately visible.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Interrogating Dynamic and Hidden Web Controls”:

“When interrogating hidden or dynamically rendered controls:

Use the Delay option on the Interrogation Form to give yourself time to hover over or activate a hidden control before Robot Studio attempts to capture it.

Use the Select Element option to manually highlight and select a control from the web application’s DOM, even when it is displayed only after an interaction such as mouse hover.These methods are particularly effective for controls that expand or render asynchronously, such as drop-down menus or tooltip-triggered elements.”

Detailed Step Reasoning:

C. Use the Delay option on the Interrogation Form.

Correct.

The Delay setting pauses the interrogation process for a specified number of seconds, allowing you to hover over the hidden element (e.g., AddressType menu) and make it visible before capture.

Once the menu appears, Pega Robot Studio can detect and interrogate it.

D. On the Interrogation Form, select Select Element.

Correct.

The Select Element tool allows manual selection of an element directly from the web page’s HTML DOM structure.

This is especially useful for hidden or dynamically rendered elements like the AddressType dropdown that may not be visible until hovered over.

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. In the Interrogation Form dialog box, select HTML Table Editor.

Incorrect.

The HTML Table Editor is used to inspect and modify HTML table-based controls (grid or table structures), not dynamic menus.

B. On the Web Controls tab, select the page, and then click List Web Controls.

Incorrect.

The List Web Controls option lists already recognized controls in the DOM but cannot reveal or capture hidden dynamic elements.

E. On the Application tab, click the Virtual Controls tab.

Incorrect.

Virtual Controls are used for defining custom controls when the default adapter cannot identify one, not for capturing hidden menu elements.

Final Correct Answer:

C. Use the Delay option on the Interrogation Form.

D. On the Interrogation Form, select Select Element.

According to Pega Robotics Studio – DateTime Utilities and Comparison Logic (Automation Components Reference Guide):

“The DateTimeUtil component provides functionality for manipulating and comparing date and time values. The component can return the result of comparing two DateTime variables as Before, Equal, or After, depending on whether the first date occurs earlier, is the same, or occurs later than the second date.”

In this automation:

firstDateToCompare = 12/31/2022

secondDateToCompare = 1/1/2022

As per Pega Robotics internal logic (based on .NET DateTime structure used within the platform):

“When two DateTime values are compared, if the first value represents a later point in time than the second value, the comparison returns ‘After’. The automation then executes the path corresponding to that result.”

Since 12/31/2022 occurs after 1/1/2022, the “After” branch executes.

That branch contains the following operation:

“The AddDays method adds the specified number of days to the current DateTime value and returns a new DateTime object that represents the resulting date and time.”

The automation adds 15 days to firstDateToCompare, resulting in:

firstDateToCompare = 1/15/2023

secondDateToCompare remains 1/1/2022 (unchanged)

Finally, the automation displays both values using the MessageDialog component.

“Use the MessageDialog component to display messages or variable values during runtime execution for verification or interaction with the user.”

Final Verified Outcome

firstDateToCompare = 1/15/2023

secondDateToCompare = 1/1/2022

Therefore, the correct answer is Option D.

Document References (Exact Extracts Source)

Pega Robotics Studio – DateTimeUtil Component Reference

Pega Robotics Studio – Automation Components Overview Guide

Pega Robotics Studio – MessageDialog Component Documentation

Pega Robotics System 8.7 Implementation Study Guide (Automation Behavior Section)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When building robotic automations intended for integration with Pega Platform (through Robotic Desktop Automation (RDA) or Robotic Process Automation (RPA)), Pega Systems outlines a set of best practices to ensure reliable execution, data consistency, and seamless communication between the automation and Pega case workflows.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Developing Robot Activities for Pega Integration”, the following recommendations are provided:

“When developing automations intended for execution by Pega applications, adhere to the following guidelines:

Always return a valid completion status from the automation to indicate success or failure to the calling Pega activity.

Ensure that the data exchanged between Pega Platform and the automation matches in both type and format to prevent runtime errors or data transformation issues.

The activity name in Pega Platform (as specified in the robotic automation name field) must exactly match the name defined in the Robot Activity component in Robot Studio to establish a valid invocation link.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Set valid completion status.

Correct. Each automation that is invoked from Pega must return a valid completion status (e.g., Success, Fail, Completed, Error). This status is sent back through the Robot Activity response data transform.

This ensures that the Pega case or data page correctly interprets the automation’s result and can take subsequent actions (e.g., proceed, retry, or raise an exception).

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application.

Correct. The data types and structure between Pega and the robotic automation must align (for example, string-to-string, integer-to-integer, JSON format consistency).

Mismatched or unstructured data results in serialization errors when passing data through the RDA bridge.

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name.

Correct. The Robotic Automation Name specified in the Pega data page or case configuration (e.g., FETCH_SCORE) must exactly match the ActivityName property defined in the Robot Studio’s Robot Activity component.

This linkage ensures that the correct automation is triggered when the case executes the RDA call.

Incorrect Options:

B. Design an automation to complete multiple tasks.

Not recommended. Pega advises building modular automations, where each automation performs a single defined task to simplify debugging and improve reuse.

C. Use an unlimited number of transferable data items.

Not recommended. The number of data items passed between Pega and Robotics should be limited to those necessary for the task, as excessive data transfers can degrade performance.

F. Run automations synchronously.

Not required. RDA automations typically run asynchronously, returning results through callback mechanisms to avoid blocking the user interface.

Therefore, the three recommended developer considerations are:

A. Set valid completion status

D. Ensure data formats agree between the automation and the Pega application

E. Match the Pega automation identifier with the robot activity component name

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When debugging automations in Pega Robot Studio, breakpoints are used to pause execution at specific points in an automation to inspect data and control flow. Before deploying or packaging a robotic solution, it is recommended to remove or clear all breakpoints to ensure that the production build executes uninterrupted.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Debugging Automations and Managing Breakpoints”:

“Breakpoints can be added, enabled, disabled, or deleted directly from the automation design surface or from the Debugging Tools window.

To remove breakpoints, developers can:

Right-click a breakpoint in the automation and select Remove Breakpoint.

Clear all breakpoints globally from the Breakpoints tab within the Debugging Tools window.

Breakpoints are maintained per automation and persist between sessions until manually removed or cleared.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Clear all automation breakpoints in the Breakpoints tab of the Debugging tools window.

Correct. This is the global method to remove all existing breakpoints across multiple automations at once.

The Breakpoints tab under Debug → Windows → Breakpoints lists every active breakpoint and includes the Clear All option to delete them.

B. Right-click a breakpoint in an automation, and then select Remove Breakpoint.

Correct. This is the direct method for deleting an individual breakpoint from within a specific automation.

C. Use the hot keys to remove each automation link that includes a breakpoint.

Incorrect. There is no hot key dedicated to breakpoint removal in Pega Robot Studio.

D. Right-click an automation on the automation surface, and then select Delete all breakpoints.

Incorrect. There is no such option available at the automation (background surface) level. Breakpoints are only removable individually or through the Breakpoints tab.

E. Click a breakpoint in an automation, and then press the Delete key.

Incorrect. The Delete key removes automation components, not debugging breakpoints.

Final Correct Answers:

A. Clear all automation breakpoints in the Breakpoints tab of the Debugging tools window.

B. Right-click a breakpoint in an automation, and then select Remove Breakpoint.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Pega Robotics System (Exact Extract & Context):

According to the Pega Robotics Automation Design and Implementation Guide:

“Robotic Automation is best suited for rule-based, repetitive, and structured tasks that do not require subjective judgment or complex decision-making.”

The guide further clarifies:

“Tasks that involve human decision-making, subjective evaluation, or business judgment are not suitable for automation through RPA, as these require contextual understanding and cognitive reasoning.”

It also specifies:

“Processes that occur infrequently, such as quarterly or annual events, are not ideal candidates for automation due to low execution frequency and limited ROI from automation development and maintenance.”

Therefore:

Option A: Complex processes that require human decision management — ❌ Not suitable, as they depend on human reasoning.

Option D: Rarely occurring processes such as sending annual reports — ❌ Not suitable, since they do not provide sufficient automation value or frequency.

Options B, C, and E describe processes that are well-suited for Pega Robotics (they are repetitive, multi-application, or rules-driven).

Document References (Exact Extracts Source)

Pega Robotics Automation Design and Implementation Guide – Identifying Suitable Tasks for Automation

Pega Robotic Process Automation Studio Training Material – Process Selection and ROI Criteria

Pega Certified Robotics System Architect Study Guide – Automation Best Practices Section

Final Verified Answer: A and D

In Pega Robot Studio, when an automation (especially one invoked as a robot activity by Pega Platform) finishes execution, it must return a Completion Status. This status helps the Pega Platform determine the outcome of the automation and decide whether to continue the workflow, retry, or handle an exception.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Robot Activity Completion Status and Workflow Integration”:

“Each robotic activity returns a Completion Status to the Pega Platform after execution.

The completion status communicates the final outcome of the automation’s operation, indicating whether it successfully completed, encountered errors, or produced invalid data.

The most common statuses used are:

Complete: The automation ran successfully, and data passed all validation checks.

DidNotComplete: The automation ran to completion, but business validation failed or data was deemed invalid.

CompletedWithErrors: The automation could not complete execution due to a system or process error.”

Detailed Reasoning:

Complete

Indicates that the robotic automation successfully executed and the resulting data passed all validation checks within Pega.

This allows the Pega case flow to continue normally.

Correct Match: “If data passes business validation, the processing flow continues.”

CompletedWithErrors

Used when the automation fails to complete due to a technical issue or system error (for example, an application did not load or a connector failed).

This causes the flow to route as a failure in Pega.

Correct Match: “If the automation fails to complete, it routes as a failure.”

DidNotComplete

Indicates that the automation successfully executed technically but failed business validation, such as incorrect data, missing inputs, or business rule mismatches.

Correct Match: “If the automation completes processing, but the data fails business validation.”

Final Correct Matching Order:

Completion Status

Automation Description

Complete

If data passes business validation, the processing flow continues.

CompletedWithErrors

If the automation fails to complete, it routes as a failure.

DidNotComplete

If the automation completes processing, but the data fails business validation.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

Assisted Sign-On (ASO) is a feature of Pega Robot Studio that allows users to securely store and automatically populate login credentials for applications used in automations.

By default, Pega Customer Service (PCS) applications are integrated with Assisted Sign-On to streamline agent desktop interactions and reduce manual logins when launching multiple applications.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Assisted Sign-On Integration with Pega Applications”:

“Pega Customer Service applications include Assisted Sign-On by default.

This feature uses Credential Manager and Runtime configuration to securely authenticate users across multiple enterprise systems during attended robotic operations.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Pega Sales Automation – Does not include ASO by default.

B. Pega Customer Decision Hub – Focused on decision management, not attended user login automation.

C. Pega Customer Service – Correct. Assisted Sign-On is preconfigured for Customer Service use cases to streamline agent authentication.

D. Pega Robot Manager – Used for deployment and management of bots, not for user authentication.

In Pega Robot Studio, the Project Explorer provides a structured view of all the components that belong to a project. These include applications, automations, and any methods (application-level procedures) associated with each application. The hierarchy in the Project Explorer reflects the relationship and scope of these components.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Project Structure and Scoping Rules section):

“Each application added to a Pega Robotics project appears under the ‘Globals’ node.

Automations are listed as separate automation objects under the application node.

Application methods such as Login or CustomerSearch are defined directly under the application to which they belong, following the hierarchy:

Globals → ApplicationName → Automations → Application Methods.”

Based on this structure:

The Globals node appears at the top.

The BankerInsight application appears under Globals.

Within BankerInsight, the two automations — AddCustomer and RemoveCustomer — are listed.

Under the same application node, the application methods CustomerSearch and Login also appear, showing they belong specifically to the BankerInsight scope.

Option C correctly represents this hierarchy because it shows:

Globals at the root.

BankerInsight as the single application node.

Under BankerInsight, both automations (AddCustomer, RemoveCustomer) and the application methods (CustomerSearch, Login) appear in sequence.

Other options show misplaced or missing elements:

Option A: Incorrect — does not display both automations and methods under the same hierarchy.

Option B: Incorrect — application methods are misplaced outside of the BankerInsight node.

Option D: Incorrect — application methods appear incorrectly scoped under separate folders.

Therefore, Option C aligns perfectly with the standard Pega Robotics Project Explorer hierarchy for the given configuration.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

Unattended automations, also referred to as Robotic Process Automations (RPA), are automations that execute without human intervention. These automations operate on robotic work queues managed by Pega Robot Manager, performing background tasks automatically.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Unattended Automations (RPA) — Execution Model and Characteristics”:

“Unattended automations execute robotic tasks in a fully automated manner without user interaction.

They retrieve assignments from robotic work queues in Pega Robot Manager, perform the specified automation tasks, and return results and case updates to Pega Platform.

These automations help streamline business workflows by automating repetitive tasks in back-end processes.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. They retrieve the next case assignment in a robotic work queue.

Correct. RPA bots work from the Robot Queue (Pega’s work queue) where cases are assigned for unattended processing.

B. They execute a fully automated task.

Correct. Unattended automations perform end-to-end automation without requiring human assistance.

C. They can streamline and automate portions of your case management workflow.

Correct. These automations integrate with Pega Platform cases, performing sub-tasks or full case resolutions automatically to improve efficiency.

D. They run during pre-processing to obtain information to display on a form.

Incorrect. That behavior describes attended automations (RDA) that assist end users in real time.

E. They complete the automated tasks based on user input.

Incorrect. Unattended automations operate without any user input; attended ones are triggered by user actions.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

According to Pega Robotics Studio – Matching and Interrogation Tools Documentation:

“Matching defines how a control is identified at runtime. When application hierarchies change or specific match rules fail, Robot Studio provides diagnostic tools to reestablish and verify the correct control associations.”

The guide specifies the following tools and their purpose:

Refresh Matching

“Refresh Matching updates the control’s properties and hierarchy information based on the current application structure without re-interrogating the control. This tool is useful when an application’s DOM or hierarchy has changed.”

Debug Matching

“Debug Matching opens the Match Rules Diagnostics window and evaluates each match rule in real-time to show which rules pass or fail. It assists in identifying which match rule must be corrected or replaced.”

By contrast:

Replace Matching – Recreates the match rules from scratch (not the preferred first step).

Replace Control – Reinterrogates the entire control and removes existing references (used only when the control is entirely invalid).

Debug Control – Analyzes properties but not matching logic.

Thus, the two correct tools to address the described issues are:

Refresh Matching (for hierarchy change)

Debug Matching (for failed rule troubleshooting)

References (Exact Extract Source):

Pega Robotics Studio – Matching Diagnostics and Interrogation Guide

Pega Robotics System Architect Training – Debugging and Refresh Matching Modules

Pega Robotics Help – Managing Match Rules in Chrome/Edge/Web Adapters

Final Verified Answer: A, C

Application discovery is an early technical validation step that involves collecting the information about applications in scope of a potential robotics use case. During discovery you need to find out application types (and if they are on applications support matrix for Pega Robotics), how they are launched, how they are used, and check accessibility and functionality of the controls through interrogation. Application discovery is necessary to ensure that robotics use case is viable and it doesn't have any technical constraints... or, if constraints exist, then what kind of workarounds will be necessary to ensure the use case is successful. The rationale for having application discovery as a best practice is that you don't want to find out half-way through coding an automation that a key control is not available or not performing the desired action.