PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam Exam Practice Test

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.9 (Audit Conclusions):

Audit conclusions must be based on verified evidence.

The evidence must be evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively to ensure accuracy.

Observations alone (A) are insufficient; conclusions must be supported by objective evidence.

Thus, B is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Toning down (or de-escalation) is a conflict resolution technique where:

Common agreements are emphasized to reduce tension.

Disagreements are addressed with a rational and constructive approach.

Option A describes compromise, and Option B describes authoritative resolution, which are different conflict resolution techniques.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 promotes the process approach, which allows organizations to structure their activities into interrelated processes. This approach helps ensure that processes effectively achieve intended results.

Clause 0.3.1 (Process Approach) states that "The application of the process approach in a quality management system enables understanding and consistency in meeting requirements, considering processes in terms of added value, and achieving effective process performance."

This aligns directly with option C, making it the correct answer. The other options are either partially correct or do not fully capture the purpose of the process approach:

Option A (Improvement based on interested parties) is a benefit but does not define the main goal.

Option B (Financial value) is not the primary focus of the process approach.

Option D (Reduction of resource consumption) may be an indirect benefit but is not a core objective.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.1.1, the organization is required to determine what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, as applicable, to ensure valid results, and when the monitoring and measuring shall be performed. The organization is also required to retain appropriate documented information as evidence of the results.

Therefore, in the scenario given, the organization should have planned for monitoring and measuring the billet temperature, as it is a critical factor for the quality of the product and the process. The organization should also have established a procedure that provides instruction in taking billet temperature, using the pyrometer or other suitable methods, to ensure consistency and accuracy. The organization should also have performed periodic analysis of the results of temperature checks, to identify trends, problems, and opportunities for improvement.

Hence, the options that would provide evidence of conformance with clause 9.1.1 of ISO 9001 are A, E, and F, as they are aligned with the requirements of the clause. The other options are either irrelevant or not directly related to clause 9.1.1, as they do not pertain to the monitoring and measurement of the billet temperature.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.2.2.e, the organization is required to retain documented information as evidence of the implementation of the audit programme and the audit results. This includes the records of the nonconformities identified during the internal audits and the corrective actions taken to address them. The organization is also required to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions, as per clause 10.2.2.

Therefore, in the scenario given, the Quality Manager’s decision to automatically close any nonconformance over 3 years old without obtaining any confirmation from the relevant departments or verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions is a clear violation of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.e. This indicates a lack of control and follow-up of the internal audit process, as well as a potential risk of recurrence or occurrence of the nonconformities in other areas. This also undermines the credibility and value of the internal audit programme, as well as the risk-based approach claimed by the Quality Manager.

Hence, the best course of action to take is D, to raise a nonconformance report against clause 9.2.2.e of ISO 9001, and to communicate the audit findings to the relevant management. The other options are either insufficient or irrelevant to address the issue, as they do not directly relate to the noncompliance with clause 9.2.2.e.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.3 (Roles and Responsibilities of Guides and Observers):

The auditee assigns a guide to assist the audit team.

The guide provides logistical support, helps with navigation, and arranges access to necessary personnel and records.

The audit team leader does not assign the guide, but they may request one.

Here is the correct matching of the activities with the responsible parties in the context of a second-party audit:

Define the audit scope: Customer

Develop the audit plan: Audit team leader

Respond to the audit findings: External provider

Conduct the audit: Audit team

This reflects the typical division of responsibilities in a second-party audit, where the customer (the party commissioning the audit) sets the scope, the audit team leader manages the planning, the external provider responds to findings, and the audit team carries out the audit.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9000:2015 defines quality as "the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics of an object fulfills requirements."

Clause 3.6.2 (Quality) confirms this definition.

Quality is determined by how well an object (product, service, or process) meets defined requirements (customer, regulatory, or internal).

The other options do not align with the official ISO definition:

Option A refers to performance capability but does not define quality.

Option C describes work conditions, not quality.

Option D focuses on efficiency rather than fulfilling requirements.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.9 (Audit Conclusions & Reporting):

One consolidated audit report should be drafted based on all team members’ findings.

Each auditor does not draft separate reports (B) unless explicitly required.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

A white background with black text Description automatically generated

Approve Certification Body: Accreditation Body

Award certification: Certification Body

Recommend certification: Audit Team Leader

Maintain certification:

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation

In the context of a third-party ISO 9001 audit, different entities play specific roles in the certification process. Here's a detailed explanation of the responsibilities:

Approve Certification Body: Accreditation BodyThe Accreditation Body is responsible for approving Certification Bodies. Accreditation Bodies are independent entities that evaluate the competence of Certification Bodies, ensuring they meet international standards like ISO/IEC 17021, which sets out the criteria for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. In this role, they confirm that the Certification Body is capable of conducting ISO 9001 audits and granting certifications in accordance with international guidelines.

Award Certification: Certification BodyThe Certification Body is the entity that ultimately awards the certification to an organization after verifying that it meets the ISO 9001 standards. Certification Bodies conduct audits, either directly or through a team of auditors, and based on the audit outcomes, they issue the certification, indicating that the organization complies with ISO 9001.

Recommend Certification: Audit Team LeaderThe Audit Team Leader is responsible for leading the audit and making a recommendation to the Certification Body. This recommendation is based on the audit findings—whether the organization meets the ISO 9001 requirements or if there are areas of non-compliance that need corrective action. The final decision on certification is not made by the Audit Team Leader but by the Certification Body.

Maintain Certification: Certification BodyMaintaining certification refers to the ongoing process of ensuring that an organization continues to comply with ISO 9001 requirements. The Certification Body conducts regular surveillance audits (e.g., annually) and may also perform recertification audits (typically every three years). This ongoing monitoring ensures that the certified organization continues to adhere to the quality management standards over time.

This breakdown clearly assigns responsibility based on the defined roles of Accreditation Bodies, Certification Bodies, and Audit Teams in the ISO 9001 certification process.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.1 (Impartiality) states that:

Internal auditors must be independent of the processes they audit to ensure objectivity.

Auditing one’s own department introduces bias and is not permitted.

Thus, Sean must not allow the auditor to audit their own department.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 is based on seven quality management principles, one of which is Relationship Management. This principle emphasizes the importance of maintaining open communication and collaboration with interested parties, including suppliers and customers.

Clause 7.4 (Communication) requires organizations to determine what, when, with whom, and how communication should take place. Since AL-TAX failed to ensure clear communication channels, it did not adhere to this principle. Effective relationship management helps improve supply chain performance, customer satisfaction, and overall QMS effectiveness.

In this scenario, the audit team leader must balance maintaining the integrity of the audit plan while considering the auditee’s request. The two best responses allow for flexibility without compromising the audit's rigor:

A. I could audit the other laboratories virtually at the end of this audit: Virtual audits can be a valid option, especially in multi-site audits. ISO 9001:2015 does not prohibit virtual audits, and in certain situations, they are practical for reviewing documentation or observing operations remotely.

C. I could try to revise the audit programme to see if I can audit all laboratories: Revising the audit programme to accommodate additional site visits is a reasonable compromise. ISO 9001:2015 audits are based on risk and sampling, but the audit team leader has the flexibility to adjust the audit scope if it fits within the audit duration and resources.

The other options, such as extending the audit duration (B, F) or strictly adhering to the original plan (D, E), may not be practical or necessary. Revising the plan to audit all laboratories or using virtual auditing ensures that the audit remains efficient while addressing the organization's concerns​.

Understanding the Purpose of a Quality Management System (QMS):The primary objective of ISO 9001:2015 is to improve the overall performance of the organization by:

Ensuring consistent delivery of products and services that meet customer and regulatory requirements.

Focusing on enhancing customer satisfaction.

Promoting continual improvement of the organization’s processes and practices.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 6.2.1 requires organizations to establish quality objectives at relevant functions, levels, and processes needed for the quality management system. The quality objectives must be consistent with the quality policy and the strategic direction of the organization. The quality objectives must also be measurable, monitored, communicated, and updated as appropriate.

In this scenario, the Quality Manager of XYZ Corporation has set quality objectives for every employee in the organization except top management. This has created a lot of resistance to the QMS, and the Chief Executive is asking questions about the cost and the method of setting objectives. The Quality Manager asks for your opinion as an auditor on whether this is the correct method of setting objectives.

As an auditor, you cannot provide advice to the organization on how it should operate its QMS. Your role is to assess the conformity and effectiveness of the QMS against the requirements of the standard and the organization’s own policies and objectives. Therefore, you should respond with the following options:

B. Advise the Quality Manager to read the ISO 9001 standard and interpret in relation to the organization’s requirements: You can suggest that the Quality Manager should familiarize himself with the requirements of clause 6.2.1 and understand how they apply to his organization. He should also consider the context and the needs and expectations of interested parties when setting quality objectives. He should ensure that the quality objectives are aligned with the quality policy and the strategic direction of the organization.

C. Advise the Quality Manager that you will raise an opportunity for improvement if the quality objectives are not addressed properly: You can inform the Quality Manager that you will evaluate the quality objectives during the audit and check whether they meet the requirements of clause 6.2.1. If you find any gaps or weaknesses in the quality objectives, you will raise an opportunity for improvement to help the organization improve its QMS. You will also verify whether the quality objectives are monitored, communicated, and updated as appropriate.

D. Inform the Quality Manager that you will comment on the subject in your audit report: You can inform the Quality Manager that you will document your findings and observations on the quality objectives in your audit report. You will also provide a summary of the audit results and any recommendations for improvement. You will also indicate the level of conformity and effectiveness of the QMS.

These three options would help you to maintain your impartiality and professionalism as an auditor and to provide constructive feedback to the organization

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 4.1, the organisation must determine the external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of its quality management system. The organisation must also monitor and review the information about these issues. SWOT analysis is a tool that can help the organisation to identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. However, the SWOT analysis alone is not sufficient to comply with the requirement, as the organisation also needs to review the information periodically and update it as necessary. Therefore, one audit trail would be to establish how the organisation reviews information about external and internal issues, such as how often, by whom, using what criteria, and with what results. 123

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 10.3, the organisation must continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the quality management system. The organisation must also consider the results of analysis and evaluation, and the outputs from management review, to determine if there are any needs or opportunities for improvement. SWOT analysis can help the organisation to identify the areas where improvement is needed or possible, such as addressing the weaknesses and threats, or exploiting the strengths and opportunities. However, the SWOT analysis alone is not sufficient to comply with the requirement, as the organisation also needs to take actions to implement the improvement, such as setting objectives, allocating resources, assigning responsibilities, and evaluating the effectiveness. Therefore, another audit trail would be to establish what actions were taken to improve the QMS, such as what, when, by whom, how, and with what results. 124 References:

1: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems — Requirements

2: Advisera, “Context of the organization in ISO 9001:2015 explained”,

3: ISO Templates, “ISO 9001 - Clause 4: Context of the organisation explained”,

4: Advisera, “How to implement continual improvement in ISO 9001”,

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Certification bodies must remain independent and impartial. If a certification body (ABC-CERT) provides consulting services to an organization through its subsidiary (Consultancy ABC), it cannot later certify the same organization.

Clause References:

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 5.2.5 – Impartiality Requirements:

A certification body must not certify an organization to which it has provided consultancy services.

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 5.2.6:

Subsidiaries of certification bodies must not provide consulting services to prevent conflicts of interest.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Certifying a client after providing consultancy creates a conflict of interest and violates ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 impartiality rules.

The certification body (ABC-CERT) and consultancy firm (Consultancy ABC) are related entities, making it impossible to remain objective and independent.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Waiting two years) → ISO does not specify a time frame; the issue is impartiality, not just time.

B (Signing an agreement to ensure objectivity) → Conflicts of interest cannot be resolved through an agreement; independence is required.

According to the definition in ISO 9000, a nonconformity is “non-fulfillment of a requirement”. There are three parts to a well-documented nonconformity: the audit evidence to support auditor findings; a record of the requirement against which the nonconformity is detected; and the statement of nonconformity1. In this case, the audit evidence is the dispatch records that show the same batch number of the product being delivered by two different trucks at different times. The requirement is the procedure P-02 Rev.3 that says that trucks should carry a complete batch. The statement of nonconformity is that the batch 33555 was delivered split in two different trucks (011 and 025), which does not conform to the procedure. Therefore, option C best describes the identified nonconformity, as it includes all three parts of a well-documented nonconformity. Option A is not correct, as it does not state the audit evidence or the requirement. Option B is not correct, as it does not specify the audit evidence or the statement of nonconformity. Option D is not correct, as it does not match the audit evidence or the requirement. References: 1: ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Nonconformity - Documenting.

Questions no: 16 Verified Answer: = C. 7.4 Communication Comprehensive But Short Explanation: = Clause 7.4 of ISO 9001:2015 requires the organization to determine the internal and external communications relevant to the quality management system, including what will be communicated, when, with whom, and how. The scenario indicates a potential gap in communication with subcontractors regarding the Quality Policy, objectives, and plans to address risks and opportunities, which is a requirement even if the subcontractors have their own ISO 9001 certified systems123. References: = This response is based on the general requirements of ISO 9001:2015 related to communication with external parties, such as subcontractors, as outlined in various resources discussing Clause 7.4123.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Auditors must focus on key processes that impact QMS effectiveness to ensure audit risks are minimized.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.3 – Managing Audit Risk: Auditors should prioritize critical processes to obtain reasonable assurance.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

Some processes are critical (e.g., production quality, customer complaints handling).

If these material processes fail, the QMS could collapse.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Needs of internal parties) → Important, but not the primary focus for reducing audit risk.

C (Previous audit results) → Useful for improvement but does not directly reduce current audit risks.

D (Financial risks) → ISO 9001 focuses on quality risks, not financial risks.

A screenshot of a chat Description automatically generated

According to the ISO 9000:2015 document, the seven quality management principles are:

Customer focus

Leadership

Engagement of people

Process approach

Improvement

Evidence-based decision making

Relationship management

For each principle, the document provides a statement, a rationale, key benefits, and actions you can take to apply the principle in your organization.

Based on the document, here is a possible way to match a potential benefit to each of the four quality management principles you mentioned:

Table

Quality management principle

Potential benefit

Customer focus

Increased revenue and market share

Engagement of people

Enhanced trust and collaboration throughout the organization

Improvement

Enhanced drive for innovation

Evidence-based decision making

Increased ability to demonstrate effectiveness of past actions

 Clause Reference – ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.6 (Release of Products and Services):

ISO 9001 requires that products and services are not released to the customer until:

All planned verification activities have been completed.

Acceptance criteria have been met.

Any necessary approvals have been obtained.

In this scenario:

The sacrificial anodes for Project DK were shipped before the galvanic efficiency test results were analyzed.

This constitutes a nonconformity against Clause 8.6 because the products were released without completing the required tests.

 Option Analysis:

A. A retrospective concession was not sought from the customer once the test results had been approved by the Quality Manager:Incorrect. While obtaining a concession might mitigate the situation, the nonconformity pertains to the process failure of releasing the products without completing required tests, not the absence of a concession.

B. Release of the product without acceptable test results has been accepted by the customer for Project DK:Incorrect. The customer was not informed before the release, and there is no indication that this was accepted beforehand. Furthermore, ISO 9001 requires planned processes to be followed, regardless of later acceptance.

C. Products for Project DK have been released before product approval through the quality control process:Correct. This description accurately reflects the nonconformity. The quality control process required test results to be analyzed and verified before release, which did not happen.

D. The untested product was not recalled until the galvanic efficiency of the anodes was verified:Incorrect. The issue is not about recalling the product but about releasing it without completing the required tests. Recalling the product is not mentioned in the scenario.

 Why C is Correct:

The nonconformity is a clear breach of Clause 8.6, where the products were released without meeting the planned verification requirements.

This demonstrates a failure in adhering to quality control processes, which is a critical aspect of ISO 9001 compliance.

 Key ISO 9001 Reference:

Clause 8.6: Products and services shall not be released to the customer until all planned activities (e.g., testing) have been satisfactorily completed, or the customer has approved the release with knowledge of deviations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

✅ Correct Option D – “I will sign all the purchase orders now.”

This response represents an immediate correction in accordance with ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.4.3 – Information for external providers, which requires control over procurement documentation. The absence of required authorisation (signature) is a nonconformity in executing the organization’s purchasing procedure.

Clause 8.4.3 specifically mandates that the organization:

“Shall communicate to external providers its requirements for:

a) the processes, products and services to be provided;

b) the approval of:

products and services;

methods, processes, and equipment;

the release of products and services.”

The purchase order process includes documented approval, which in this case was defined internally as a signature by the Purchasing or Production Manager. Signing the documents retroactively, while not ideal, is a correction to bring the documentation back into compliance and resolve the immediate issue.

❌ Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. "No correction needed": Dismissing the nonconformity based on product performance fails to address the lack of documented control, violating Clause 8.4.3 and internal procedures.

B. "I will ask the Production Manager to sign them now": This option shows intention but lacks immediacy and ownership. Also, backdating signatures without traceability can be ethically questionable.

C. "I do not accept the nonconformity": This reflects noncompliance and a poor quality culture, contradicting ISO 9001’s Clause 5.1.1 (Leadership commitment).

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes risk-based thinking, which helps organizations identify factors that could prevent achieving planned results and take preventive action. Clause 6.1 (Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities) requires organizations to determine risks and opportunities and implement actions to mitigate potential negative impacts.

In the scenario, AL-TAX identified potential risks and implemented preventive actions, aligning with risk-based thinking. ISO 9001:2015 integrates risk management throughout the standard, ensuring processes are designed to minimize uncertainties.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

A technical expert is someone with specialized knowledge that helps the audit team understand specific technical aspects of the auditee’s processes.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 7.3.4 – Use of Technical Experts:

Technical experts support the audit team with specialized knowledge but do not perform the audit themselves.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

A technical expert is needed when auditors lack deep expertise in specific areas, such as engineering, software, or medical devices.

They assist in interpreting complex technical requirements but do not act as auditors.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Observer) → Observers do not contribute expertise; they only watch the audit (e.g., trainees).

C (Guide) → Guides help with logistics but do not provide technical expertise.

Understanding Clause 7.1.5.2 – Measurement Traceability:ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to ensure that measuring equipment (e.g., spectrometers) is calibrated and traceable to recognized standards. The failure to maintain calibration within valid dates directly violates this clause and raises concerns about the reliability of the measurement results.

Root Cause of the Nonconformity:The organization failed to plan for the possibility that the calibration service provider (X-TECH) might become unavailable, leading to expired calibration. This indicates inadequate risk-based thinking, which is required under Clause 6.1 of ISO 9001:2015.

Option Analysis:

A. Select one sample for external lab analysis to use as an internal standard:Incorrect. While using an internal standard could provide short-term verification of results, this action does not address the root cause (failure to consider risks associated with external providers).

B. Look for a local company to provide this service:Incorrect. While finding a new local service provider resolves the immediate calibration issue, it does not address the risk of future provider unavailability.

C. Double-check one out of ten samples externally:Incorrect. This corrective action ensures some quality assurance for batch release but does not resolve the nonconformance related to expired calibration.

D. Add this issue to the external issue register, assess its associated risk, and plan action to address that risk:Correct. This approach directly addresses the root cause (failure to anticipate the calibration provider leaving) and ensures proper risk management. ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes risk-based thinking under Clause 6.1, requiring organizations to identify risks and opportunities and implement plans to mitigate them.

Why D is the Best Option:

By adding the issue to the external issue register, the organization ensures it is monitored and tracked.

Assessing the risk ensures proactive measures are in place for similar issues in the future.

Planning actions to address the risk ensures a sustainable solution is implemented, such as identifying multiple service providers or ensuring backup plans for calibration services.

ISO 9001 References:

Clause 6.1 (Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities): Requires organizations to consider risks and opportunities that could affect the intended results of the QMS.

Clause 7.1.5.2 (Measurement Traceability): Mandates that measuring equipment must be calibrated and traceable to ensure valid results.

Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action): Requires organizations to determine the root cause of nonconformities and take actions to ensure they do not recur.

•

Reviews the client’s management system documented information: This activity involves checking the documentation of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team also evaluates the client’s understanding and implementation of the standard, and identifies any gaps or nonconformities that need to be addressed before the Stage 2 audit123.

•Reviews the processes with high level of risk: This activity involves assessing the processes that have a significant impact on the quality of the products or services, or that pose a high risk of nonconformity or customer dissatisfaction123. The audit team also verifies the client’s risk management approach, and evaluates the effectiveness of the controls and actions taken to mitigate the risks123.

The other options are not statements that are true for the Stage 1 audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.

Therefore, the correct answer is D and G.

The actions that should be taken in the context of the audit are:

•Option B: Call the individual(s) managing the audit programme to explain the situation and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body. This option is correct because the auditor has found serious and significant gaps in the QMS processes that affect the health and safety of the patients, which is a major nonconformity that may warrant suspension of certification. The auditor should inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme of the situation and the audit findings, and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body and the credibility of the certification scheme. The auditor should also follow the Certification Body’s procedures and rules for suspension of certification and communicate the decision and the consequences to the auditee.

•Option C: Continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. This option is correct because the auditor should not terminate or postpone the closing meeting due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as the DCM is the auditee’s nominated representative for the audit. The auditor should continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and the audit findings, and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. The auditor should also explain the audit outcome recommendation and the suspension of certification, and request the DCM to acknowledge the receipt and understanding of the audit results.

The following options are not correct:

•Option A: Close the meeting immediately after the DCM’s response and advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit. This option is not correct because the auditor should not close the meeting without presenting the audit conclusions and the audit findings, as this would violate the audit principles of fairness and transparency. The auditor should also not advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit, as this would imply that the auditor is accepting the auditee’s delay and inaction, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously.

•Option D: Conclude the meeting early and advise that it will be rescheduled once the Catering Manager has returned to work. This option is not correct because the auditor should not conclude the meeting early or reschedule it due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as this would disrupt the audit process and the audit schedule. The auditor should also not wait for the Catering Manager to return to work, as this would delay the communication and resolution of the major nonconformity, and potentially compromise the health and safety of the patients.

•Option E: Recommend that all personnel should be given urgent in-depth training in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not recommend or prescribe specific corrective actions to the auditee, as this would violate the audit principles of independence and objectivity. The auditor should only report the audit findings and the audit outcome recommendation, and leave the responsibility and authority for determining and implementing the corrective actions to the auditee.

•Option F: Thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS, as this would imply that the auditor is satisfied and optimistic with the auditee’s performance and response, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously. The auditor should instead express the concern and dissatisfaction with the auditee’s QMS processes and the impact on the health and safety of the patients, and communicate the suspension of certification and the need for urgent and effective corrective actions.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.5.1 (Certification Decision):

Auditors who conduct the audit cannot be involved in the certification decision to ensure impartiality.

The certification body alone is responsible for making the certification decision based on the audit report and findings.

The audit team leader (Eva) must not take part in the certification decision.

Thus, C is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

One of the common misconceptions about ISO 9001 is that it only applies to manufacturing companies producing tangible goods. However, ISO 9001:2015 is designed for all types of organizations, including service providers such as financial, healthcare, and IT companies.

Clause 1 (Scope) clearly states that ISO 9001 is applicable to any organization, regardless of type, size, or the products and services it provides. AL-TAX, being a financial services company, is equally eligible for implementing a QMS under ISO 9001.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.6.2, a nonconformity is the non-fulfilment of a requirement. A nonconformity can be classified as either major or minor, depending on the nature and extent of the deviation from the audit criteria. A major nonconformity is a nonconformity that affects the ability or the integrity of the organization’s management system to achieve the intended results. A minor nonconformity is a nonconformity that does not affect the ability or the integrity of the organization’s management system to achieve the intended results, but is a deviation from the audit criteria1.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.4.9, the organization is required to analyze the cause and describe the specific correction and corrective actions taken, or planned to be taken, to eliminate detected nonconformities, within a defined time. The organization is also required to provide the certification body with records and evidence of the implementation and effectiveness of the correction and corrective actions taken. The certification body will then verify the correction and corrective actions taken by the organization and decide on the certification status2.

Therefore, the two options of when the organization is required to act in response to reported findings are D and F, as they indicate the presence of nonconformities that need to be corrected and prevented from recurring. The other options are not correct, as they do not require the organization to act in response to reported findings:

•A. A recommendation is given in the report: A recommendation is a suggestion for improvement that is not related to a nonconformity. A recommendation is not binding for the organization and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to accept or reject the recommendation, but it is not required to act on it.

•B. A finding of good practice is reported: A finding of good practice is a positive observation that indicates a strength or a best practice of the organization’s management system. A finding of good practice is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to acknowledge or share the finding of good practice, but it is not required to act on it.

•C. An opportunity for improvement is raised: An opportunity for improvement is a potential area where the organization’s management system can be enhanced or optimized. An opportunity for improvement is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to pursue or ignore the opportunity for improvement, but it is not required to act on it.

•E. A finding of conformity is reported: A finding of conformity is a confirmation that the organization’s management system fulfils the audit criteria. A finding of conformity is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to celebrate or communicate the finding of conformity, but it is not required to act on it.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Discussing audit findings before the closing meeting ensures that:

The audit objectives have been met (ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.10).

The auditee has an opportunity to clarify misunderstandings or provide additional evidence.

The audit team and the auditee agree on the accuracy of findings before finalizing the report.

While encouraging corrective actions (B) is beneficial, the primary purpose of discussing findings is to ensure that the audit was conducted effectively and aligned with objectives. Identifying responsible persons (C) is not the auditor’s role.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 does not require an organization to hire external consultants for the implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS). Clause 7.2 (Competence) states that an organization must ensure that personnel are competent based on education, training, or experience. However, it does not mandate hiring an external consultant. The organization can choose to develop internal competency or seek external assistance at its discretion.

Additionally, Clause 5.1.1 (Leadership and Commitment) specifies that top management is accountable for the effectiveness of the QMS, including ensuring sufficient resources and competent personnel. Hiring an external consultant is an option, not a requirement.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires collaboration between the auditee (TD Advertising), the certification body, and the audit leader when making changes to audit scope.

Clause References:

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.2.3 – Conducting the Audit: Any change in audit scope must be agreed upon by all parties before proceeding.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

TD cannot unilaterally change the scope without agreement from the certification body and audit leader.

The certification body must ensure the scope remains relevant and that resources are allocated properly.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Anne cannot withdraw) → Incorrect, Anne CAN withdraw if the changes make the audit unfeasible, but she must consult with the certification body first.

B (TD cannot change the scope) → Incorrect, scope changes are allowed but must be formally approved.

D (Anne has full authority to reject scope changes) → Incorrect, scope changes require mutual agreement among all parties.

To demonstrate top management’s leadership and commitment with respect to the quality management system, the following four actions would be indicative:

B. Briefing staff on the development of an improvement culture: This shows that top management is actively involved in promoting a culture of continuous improvement, which is a key aspect of the quality management system1.

C. Chairing management review meetings: By leading these meetings, top management demonstrates their involvement in the quality management system’s ongoing performance and commitment to its continual improvement1.

E. Investing time and money in corrective actions arising from nonconformities: This indicates that top management is committed to addressing issues and ensuring that the quality management system is effective and continually improving1.

G. Promoting the importance of following procedures: When top management emphasizes the importance of adherence to procedures, it reinforces the significance of the quality management system and its processes1.

These actions align with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes the need for top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the quality management system and to promote a focus on continual improvement and customer satisfaction123. Approving company car budgets, conducting disciplinary meetings, and not attending the audit closing meeting do not directly demonstrate leadership and commitment to the quality management system1.

The table below shows the possible matching of the ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract to the audit evidence.

Table

Audit evidence

ISO 9001 Clause 8 extract

Four of the 10 pallets of stock sampled in the warehouse were not labelled.

“8.5.2 … shall use suitable means to identify outputs …”

A damaged pallet of stock seen in the quarantine area was leaking liquid onto the floor.

“8.7.1 … shall ensure that outputs that do not conform to their requirements are identified and controlled …”

One of the fork-lift truck drivers had no fork-lift truck driving licence.

“8.5.1 e … shall include, as applicable … the appointment of competent persons …”

There was no pest control provision in the warehouse.

“8.5.4 … shall preserve the outputs during production and service provision …”

Two pallets of temperature-sensitive stock items were being stored at ambient as the chilled storage facility was full.

“8.1 … shall plan, implement and control the processes …”

Nonconformity report

ISO 9001 Clause Number: 9.3.1 Nature of problem: Management review has not been conducted at the defined frequency. ISO 9001 requirement that has not been fulfilled: ISO 9001 - “Top management shall review the organization’s quality management system at planned intervals.” Evidence: The last management review took place nine months ago, and the previous one took place one year before the latest review. The planned interval is six months.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 4.3, the organization is required to determine the scope of its quality management system (QMS) by considering the external and internal issues referred to in clause 4.1. Clause 4.1 requires the organization to determine the external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and strategic direction, and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of its QMS. These issues can include positive and negative factors or conditions for consideration, such as legal, technological, competitive, market, cultural, social, and economic environments, whether international, national, regional, or local. The organization is also required to monitor and review these issues.

Therefore, the correct answer is C, as external issues of the organization’s context are one of the factors that must be considered when determining the scope of the QMS. The other options are either not directly related to the scope of the QMS, or are not explicitly mentioned in clause 4.3.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.8 (Audit Reporting):

The audit report must be submitted to the certification body regardless of corrective actions.

Corrective actions are reviewed after the audit, but the audit process should not be delayed.

Certification decisions should be made based on the audit findings and evidence, not pending corrective actions.

Thus, delaying audit activities until corrective actions are submitted is not acceptable.

This option reflects a balanced and professional approach. The audit team leader should first gather information directly from the involved auditor to understand the situation before making any decisions. It demonstrates due diligence and fairness.

This ensures that the situation is properly escalated and handled in accordance with the auditing body’s procedures. Consulting the audit programme manager helps ensure consistency in handling such incidents.

The nonconformity raised is based on objective evidence, independent of the incident with the photographs. ISO 9001 audits are evidence-based, and the validity of the findings should not be compromised by unrelated issues.

1. A. Advise the Quality Manager that he, as audit team leader, needs to speak to the auditor about the situation and he will report back to the Quality Manager once this is done:2. D. Delay the Closing meeting until the audit team leader has consulted his audit programme manager at Head Office:3. E. Insist that the nonconformities must stand since they have been agreed by the team from other evidence gathered:

B. Advise the Quality Manager that the auditor will be reported to Head Office:

Reporting the auditor directly without first investigating the situation is premature and unprofessional. It might escalate the issue unnecessarily.

C. Apologize for the situation and ensure the Quality Manager that all photographs will be deleted during the Closing meeting:

Deleting evidence without proper consultation could be seen as tampering or unprofessional conduct. It’s essential to understand the context of the photographs first.

F. State that the auditor will take no further part in the audit and all his photographs will be deleted:

This is an extreme response without first investigating the situation. Taking unilateral action without gathering facts can damage the audit's integrity.

Why Not the Other Options:

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Stage 2 audit (ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.3.1.3) is conducted to:

Verify whether the QMS is effectively implemented and operational.

Ensure compliance with ISO 9001 requirements in actual practice.

Identify nonconformities that may impact certification.

Reviewing documented information (Answer B) is part of Stage 1, and gathering scope information (Answer C) is done before the certification audit.

The following table shows the possible matching of the records to the requirements of clause 8.4:

Table

Requirements

Records

Define product requirements

Product specification

Criteria for selection

List of requirements to be met by the external provider

Evaluation of potential external provider

External provider questionnaire

External provider selection

Approved external provider list

Communicate requirements

Purchase order

Monitoring of performance

External provider delivery times and quality issues

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation: = According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

Define the product requirements that are relevant for the external provision, such as specifications, drawings, standards, codes, etc. These should be documented and communicated to the external provider. A record of the product specification can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently. A record of the list of requirements to be met by the external provider can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed. A record of the external provider questionnaire can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved. A record of the approved external provider list can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely. A record of the purchase order can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed. A record of the external provider delivery times and quality issues can be used as evidence of this requirement.

A Stage 1 audit is a preliminary assessment to evaluate the readiness of the organisation for the Stage 2 certification audit. The audit scope is defined by the audit client and the certification body based on the application and the contract. If the organisation wants to include a new work area that was not part of the original scope, the auditor should advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures, such as submitting a formal request, providing relevant information, and paying additional fees. The auditor should also suggest that the Quality Manager will advise the programme manager, who is responsible for managing the audit programme, that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area. The programme manager will then decide whether to approve or reject the request, and communicate the decision to the auditor and the Quality Manager. The auditor should not proceed with the audit of the new work area without the approval of the programme manager and the confirmation of the audit scope. 1234 References:

1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

2: ISO 9001 Certification Audits | Stage 1 and Stage 2 - 9001. Simplified

3: What is the difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Audits? - ISO Update

4: Getting Certified to ISO 9001 - the Stage 1 Audit

In ISO 9001:2015, the responsibility for managing the audit program lies with those overseeing the entire audit process rather than the Audit Team Leader. During the planning stage, before involving the Audit Team Leader, key actions for managing the audit program include:

1. Providing the Resources Needed: According to clause 7.1 (Resources), the audit program manager must ensure that the necessary resources are in place to conduct the audit effectively. This encompasses logistical support, personnel, and other required resources for the audit to proceed smoothly.

2. Reviewing Reports of Previous Audits: As per clause 9.2.2 (Internal Audit), it is essential to consider the results of previous audits to plan effectively for the upcoming audit. This helps identify areas that require particular attention, ensuring continuity and focusing on recurring issues or improvements since the last audit.

These actions ensure that the audit is thoroughly prepared and that there is continuity and focus on any areas that might need closer inspection. The other options, such as preparing the audit plan, assigning responsibilities, preparing checklists, and selecting the audit team members, generally fall under the duties of the Audit Team Leader once they are appointed and engaged in the planning process.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.9 (Corrective Actions) states:

The auditor can set a reasonable deadline for corrective actions.

10 to 60 days is a best practice timeframe for the auditee to respond.

The auditee must propose corrective actions, but the audit team has the authority to set the deadline.

A 7-day deadline (A) is too short, and the audit team—not the auditee—determines the timeframe (B).

A first-party audit is an internal audit conducted by auditors who are employed by the organization being audited but who have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited1. The purpose of a first-party audit is to assess the conformity of the organization’s quality management system to the requirements of ISO 9001 and to identify opportunities for improvement2. Therefore, the two auditors who would not participate in a first-party audit are:

•A. An auditor employed by an external consultancy organization: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a customer or supplier of the organization being audited) or a third-party audit (if the external consultancy organization is a certification body or registrar).

•F. An auditor from a customer: This auditor is not employed by the organization being audited, and therefore does not qualify as a first-party auditor. This auditor may be hired to conduct a second-party audit, as a customer is an interested party that has specific requirements for the organization being audited.

The other options are not correct, as they could participate in a first-party audit, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited:

•B. An auditor from an interested party: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as the interested party is within the organization being audited. For example, an auditor from the finance department could audit the production department, as long as they are not involved in the production process or affected by its outcomes.

•C. An auditor trained in-house: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The source of the auditor’s training is not relevant for determining the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•D. An auditor trained in the IRCA scheme: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. The IRCA scheme is a professional certification scheme for auditors of management systems, which provides recognition of the auditor’s competence and credibility3. However, being trained in the IRCA scheme does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

•E. An auditor certified by IRCA: This auditor could be a first-party auditor, as long as they are employed by the organization being audited and have no vested interest in the audit results of the area being audited. Being certified by IRCA means that the auditor has met the requirements of the IRCA scheme and has demonstrated their competence and credibility as an auditor of management systems3. However, being certified by IRCA does not determine the type of audit, as long as the auditor is competent and qualified to perform the audit.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

One of the seven quality management principles in ISO 9001:2015 is Improvement, which emphasizes continual enhancement of processes, products, and services.

Clause 10.3 (Continual Improvement) states that organizations must continuously assess risks, consequences, and impacts to improve their QMS.

Risk-based thinking (Clause 0.3.3) supports improvement by identifying and mitigating risks before they affect performance.

Clause 6.1 (Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities) requires organizations to take a proactive approach, ensuring long-term success.

Other options do not fully align with the question:

Process approach (A) focuses on managing interrelated activities.

Leadership (B) ensures commitment but does not directly address risk assessment.

Relationship management (D) deals with interested parties, not risk mitigation.

Based on the scenario provided, there is evidence of nonconformity with the requirements defined in:

C. Clause 7.5.1 Documented information - General: The scenario indicates that there is no formal process for informing users about updates to the SWIFT database, which suggests a lack of control over documented information. This could lead to users being unaware of important changes and not using the latest version of the software, which is required by the quality management system1.

E. Clause 7.5.3 Control of documented information: The Operations Director’s approach to updating the SWIFT database and the lack of communication to users about these updates indicate that the documented information is not adequately controlled. Allowing users to revert to earlier versions of the software at their discretion further suggests that the organization does not have a proper mechanism in place to ensure the integrity and suitability of documented information2.

These clauses are part of the ISO 9001:2015 standard, which requires organizations to have a systematic approach to controlling and managing documented information as part of their quality management system. The scenario described shows a casual approach to managing critical software updates, which could affect the organization’s ability to consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements.

According to the ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary, correction is defined as “action to eliminate a detected nonconformity”. A nonconformity is defined as “non-fulfilment of a requirement”. Therefore, the process of modifying a non-conforming product to bring it within acceptance criteria is a correction, as it eliminates the non-fulfilment of the product specification. The other options are not correct, as they have different definitions and purposes:

•Concession: permission to release or use a nonconforming product, service or process

•Corrective action: action to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to prevent recurrence

•Preventive action: action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or other undesirable potential situation

Sequence:

Stage 1 Audit

Stage 2 Opening Meeting

Interviews

Stage 2 Closing Meeting

Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings

Issue Certificate

Surveillance Audit

Follow-up Audit

To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.

Here is a brief explanation of each step:

Stage 1 Audit: This is the initial audit that aims to assess the readiness of the organization for the stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documentation of the quality management system, evaluating the scope and objectives of the audit, and identifying any major gaps or nonconformities34.

Stage 2 Opening Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the start of the stage 2 audit. It involves confirming the audit plan, the audit criteria, the audit scope, and the audit team. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to ask any questions or raise any concerns34.

Interviews: This is the main activity of the stage 2 audit, where the audit team collects evidence by interviewing the personnel involved in the quality management system, observing the processes and activities, and examining the records and documents. The audit team uses various techniques, such as sampling, measurement, analysis, and evaluation, to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system345.

Stage 2 Closing Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the end of the stage 2 audit. It involves presenting the audit findings, the audit conclusions, and the audit report to the auditee. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to provide feedback, ask questions, or dispute any findings34.

Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings: This is the process of verifying that the auditee has taken appropriate corrective actions to address any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during the stage 2 audit. The audit team may request evidence or conduct a follow-up visit to confirm the effectiveness of the corrective actions34.

Issue Certificate: This is the process of issuing a certificate of conformity to the auditee, if the audit team is satisfied that the quality management system meets the requirements of the standard and that there are no major nonconformities or unresolved issues. The certificate is valid for a specified period, usually three years, and is subject to periodic surveillance audits34.

Surveillance Audit: This is the process of conducting periodic audits, usually once a year, to monitor the continued conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system. It involves reviewing the changes, improvements, and performance of the quality management system, and identifying any new nonconformities or opportunities for improvement34.

Follow-up Audit: This is the process of conducting an additional audit, usually in response to a significant change, a complaint, or a major nonconformity, to verify the impact and the corrective actions taken by the auditee. It may result in the suspension, withdrawal, or renewal of the certificate, depending on the outcome of the audit34.

 Responsibilities of the Audit Team Leader:

ISO 19011:2018 (guidelines for auditing management systems), which supports the principles in ISO 9001:2015, specifies the responsibilities of an audit team leader. These responsibilities include:

Planning the audit and establishing effective communication between the audit team and auditee.

Ensuring that formal communication channels are agreed upon and followed.

Reporting the audit progress, significant findings, and any concerns to the auditee or audit client as necessary.

Managing the audit team and ensuring adherence to the defined objectives and scope.

 Analysis of Options:

A. Reporting unattainable audit objectives to the accreditation body:Incorrect. This is not the responsibility of the audit team leader. The accreditation body oversees the certification body and is not directly involved in specific audits. If objectives are unattainable, the audit team leader would report them to the audit client (the certification body), not the accreditation body.

B. Planning formal communication arrangements:Correct. This is one of the responsibilities of the audit team leader. They ensure auditees can communicate with auditors as needed during the audit process.

C. Confirming communication channels during the opening meeting:Correct. During the opening meeting, the audit team leader must establish clear communication protocols to ensure effective information exchange between the audit team and auditee.

D. Communicating progress, findings, and concerns:Correct. Keeping the auditee and audit client informed about progress and significant findings is a critical responsibility of the audit team leader to maintain transparency and ensure the audit objectives are met.

 Why Option A is Correct:

The audit team leader does not have any obligation to report unattainable objectives to the accreditation body. Instead, they are responsible for communicating issues to the audit client (typically the certification body). The accreditation body operates at a higher level and is concerned with overseeing certification bodies, not individual audits.

 Relevant References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4 (Conducting the Audit): Emphasizes the responsibilities of the audit team leader, including communication with the auditee and client.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit): Highlights the importance of planning and communication during audits, which is reflected in third-party audits as well.

ISO/IEC 17021-1 is the standard that specifies requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. It includes provisions for determining audit time for third-party certification audits, ensuring that the audits are conducted in a consistent, comparable, and reliable manner, which can be applied to a variety of management systems, including ISO 9001.

The purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is to determine an organization’s readiness for their Stage 2 Certification Audit. During the Stage 1, the auditor will review the organization’s management system documented information, evaluate the site-specific conditions, and have discussions with personnel. The objective is to assess the alignment of the organization’s design with ISO 9001 requirements and to identify any areas of concern that could be classified as a nonconformance during the Stage 2 Audit. The auditor will also use the Stage 1 Audit to complete Stage 2 Audit planning, including a review of the allocation of resources and details for the next phase of the audit. Therefore, the option that best describes the purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is A, to determine the auditees understanding of ISO 9001. The other options are not correct, as they are not the main focus of a Stage 1 audit:

•B. To get to know the organization’s customers: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not interested in the specific details of the organization’s customers, but rather in the organization’s ability to meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.

•C. To learn about the organization’s procurement processes: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not interested in the specific details of the organization’s procurement processes, but rather in the organization’s ability to control externally provided processes, products and services.

•D. To introduce the audit team to the client: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not there to make introductions, but rather to conduct a preliminary examination of the organization’s compliance with ISO 9001 standards.

According to the ISO 19011:2018 document, the audit plan should provide the basis for agreement regarding the conduct and scheduling of the audit activities. The amount of detail provided in the audit plan should reflect the scope and complexity of the audit, as well as the risk of not achieving the audit objectives1. The scope of the audit refers to the extent and boundaries of the audit, such as the audit criteria, the audit objectives, the organizational and functional units, and the processes to be audited1. The complexity of the audit refers to the degree of difficulty or intricacy of the audit, such as the number and diversity of the auditees, the audit criteria, the audit methods, and the audit team composition2. The risk of not achieving the audit objectives refers to the possibility that the audit may fail to provide reliable and sufficient audit evidence to support the audit conclusions and report1.

Therefore, the complete sentence is:

In the context of a third-party audit, the amount of detail provided in the audit plan should reflect the scope and complexity of the audit, as well as the risk of not achieving the audit objectives.

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Clause 8.3.2 e) – Internal Resource Needs:Delays due to staff shortages highlight a lack of internal resources, directly relating to this clause that requires internal resource planning for design and development.

Clause 8.3.6 – Design and Development Changes:Ongoing formulation changes due to feedback need to be documented and reviewed. This clause requires retention of documented information on changes.

Clause 8.3.5 – Design and Development Outputs:Customer approvals for formulations are outputs of the design process and must be retained as documented information, as per this clause.

Clause 8.3.4 d) – Design and Development Controls:Consumer trials are a validation activity. This clause ensures such trials are conducted to confirm that resulting products meet defined requirements.

Clause 8.3.2 e) – External Resource Needs:Shelf-life tests done by an external lab are part of the external resources needed for development and are referenced here.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Clause 9.1.1 – Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation (General) requires the organization to:

“Determine what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation needed to ensure valid results, and when results shall be analyzed and evaluated.”

The goal is to ensure valid, reliable, and consistent measurement of process and product performance. Here's how each correct option supports compliance:

✅ B. Analysis of the results of sensory tests

This directly aligns with the requirement for analysis and evaluation of monitoring results. Clause 9.1.3 also supports the use of such data for evaluating product conformity and process effectiveness.

✅ G. Sensory testing results are recorded

This supports documented evidence of monitoring results, as required under 9.1.1(e), to verify that quality checks (such as flavor and aroma assessments) are being done consistently.

✅ H. The Hedonic Method is used to monitor the quality of the product

Use of a standardized measurement method like the Hedonic Scale aligns with 9.1.1(b), which requires defined methods to ensure valid and reproducible results.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect or Less Relevant:

A. University degrees → Related to competence (Clause 7.2), not monitoring and measurement (Clause 9.1.1).

C. Independent expert review → Not part of regular monitoring unless it’s built into the process.

D. Respiratory testing → Irrelevant to product quality monitoring.

E. Outsourcing → Would shift responsibility but doesn’t demonstrate internal conformance.

F. Safe disposal → Pertains to Clause 8.5.4 (Preservation), not Clause 9.1.1.

In the context of ISO 9001:2015 audits, it is the audit team leader who holds the responsibility for assigning work to the audit team. According to ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for auditing management systems, which complements ISO 9001:2015), the audit team leader is responsible for the organization and direction of the audit, including assigning specific roles and responsibilities to audit team members. This includes preparation of the audit plan, leading the audit, and ensuring that each team member understands their tasks.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3, the audit plan is a document that provides the basis for agreement regarding the conduct of the audit. The audit plan should include the information listed in my previous response, such as the audit objectives, scope, criteria, schedule, team, methods, report, etc. The audit plan should be prepared and completed prior to the on-site audit, and should be communicated to the audit team and the auditee1.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.4.3, the checklist / prompts are documents that list the questions or topics that need to be covered during an audit. The checklist / prompts can help the auditor to collect and verify information relevant to the audit criteria, and to ensure the consistency and completeness of the audit. The checklist / prompts should be prepared and completed prior to the on-site audit, and should be based on the audit plan and the audit scope and objectives1.

Therefore, the two documents that an auditor needs to prepare and complete prior to the on-site audit are B and D, as they are essential for planning and conducting the audit. The other options are not correct, as they are either prepared or completed after the on-site audit, or not required by the standard:

•A. Audit Report: The audit report is a document that provides a complete, accurate, concise, and clear record of the audit. The audit report should include the information listed in my previous response, such as the audit objectives, scope, criteria, findings, conclusions, etc. The audit report should be prepared and completed after the on-site audit, and should be distributed to the audit client and the auditee1.

•C. Procedures: Procedures are documents that specify the way activities are to be performed. Procedures may be part of the audit criteria, if they are part of the organization’s management system, or part of the audit programme, if they are part of the certification body’s or registrar’s requirements. Procedures are not prepared or completed by the auditor prior to the on-site audit, but rather reviewed or followed by the auditor during the audit1.

•E. Risk Matrices: Risk matrices are tools that help to assess and prioritize the risks and opportunities associated with the audit programme or the audit. Risk matrices may be part of the audit programme management, if they are used to determine and evaluate the audit programme risks and opportunities, or part of the audit preparation, if they are used to determine and evaluate the audit risks and opportunities. Risk matrices are not prepared or completed by the auditor prior to the on-site audit, but rather used or updated by the auditor during the audit programme management or the audit preparation1.

•F. Findings: Findings are the results of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against the audit criteria. Findings can indicate either conformity or nonconformity, as well as positive aspects or opportunities for improvement. Findings are not prepared or completed by the auditor prior to the on-site audit, but rather generated and recorded by the auditor during the audit activities1.

Table

Statement

First-party audits

Second-party audits

Third-party audits

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.

Yes

No

No

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.

No

No

Yes

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.

No

Yes

No

Here is a brief explanation of each statement:

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.