IICRC WRT Water Damage Restoration Technician (WRT) Exam Practice Test

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge mandates that EPA-registered antimicrobials (biocides) must be used strictly in accordance with the product label directions. Under U.S. law, the label is considered a legal document, and deviation from label instructions constitutes misuse of a pesticide.

Label directions specify approved application methods, dilution ratios, dwell times, PPE requirements, ventilation needs, and occupant restrictions. The WRT manual emphasizes that technicians are not permitted to alter concentrations, combine products, or improvise application techniques, regardless of perceived effectiveness.

Estimating dilution or increasing concentration does not improve efficacy and may create safety hazards, damage materials, or expose occupants and workers to chemical risks. Combining products can produce toxic reactions, while under-dilution or over-dilution may render the antimicrobial ineffective or unsafe.

The WRT curriculum reinforces that antimicrobials are supplemental tools, not replacements for removal of unsalvageable materials or proper drying. Proper use ensures regulatory compliance, protects health, and limits liability for the restorer.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge requires that restorersrecord and monitor drying measurements at least daily. Daily monitoring ensures that drying systems are functioning properly, drying goals are being approached, and adjustments can be made promptly if progress stalls.

Measurements typically include air temperature, relative humidity, humidity ratio, dew point, and moisture content or moisture levels of affected materials. The WRT manual emphasizes trend analysis—comparing daily readings to confirm consistent moisture reduction.

Infrequent monitoring increases the risk of unnoticed equipment failure, elevated humidity, condensation, or secondary damage. Weekly or bi-weekly monitoring does not meet the professional standard of care outlined in the ANSI/IICRC S500 Standard.

Daily documentation also supports defensibility by demonstrating continuous oversight and proactive management of the drying process. It provides transparency to materially interested parties and ensures accountability throughout the project lifecycle.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains thataerosolization of contaminantsoccurs when airflow disperses particulate matter, microorganisms, or contaminated droplets into the air. To reduce this risk, restorers shouldminimize air movementin contaminated areas until proper controls are in place.

In Category 2, Category 3, or mold-affected environments, uncontrolled airflow can spread contaminants beyond the affected area, increasing exposure risk and cross-contamination. The WRT manual emphasizes that airflow should be strategically managed and often delayed until containment and air filtration devices (AFDs) are installed.

Increasing air movement or temperature without controls can worsen aerosolization. Temperature reduction alone does not address particulate dispersion. Minimizing air movement—combined with containment and filtration—is the recommended approach under WRT safety principles.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifiesnon-penetrating (non-invasive) moisture metersas the preferredinitialmethod for surveying moisture in a wide range of building materials. These devices allow restorers to rapidly scan large surface areas without damaging finished materials, making them ideal for initial inspection and moisture mapping.

Non-invasive meters work by emitting electromagnetic signals that respond to changes in material density and moisture presence. While they do not provide precise moisture content values, they are effective at identifying areas of concern that warrant further investigation.

The WRT manual stresses that invasive meters, material removal, or drilling should only be performedafternon-invasive methods indicate elevated readings and when confirmation is required. This tiered approach minimizes unnecessary damage while still ensuring accurate assessment.

Additionally, non-invasive meters are particularly useful on surfaces like ceramic tile or plaster, where penetrating probes may be impractical or destructive. Proper documentation requires that readings be repeatable and defensible, and starting with non-invasive tools supports both goals.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge definesevaporationas the process by which water changes from a liquid state to a gaseous (vapor) state. This process is central to restorative drying because it is how moisture leaves wet materials.

The WRT manual explains that evaporation occurs at the surface of materials and is influenced by airflow, surface temperature, humidity, and vapor pressure differential. Evaporation alone does not remove moisture from the structure; it must be paired with dehumidification or ventilation to remove the vapor from the air.

Hydrostatic refers to water pressure, sublimation is the change from solid to gas, and dehumidification removes vapor from air—not liquid from materials. Understanding evaporation allows restorers to design drying systems that maximize moisture release while preventing condensation and secondary damage.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifiesimproper handling and disengagingas a primary cause of carpet delamination during water damage restoration. Delamination occurs when the carpet’s primary and secondary backing layers separate, often due to mechanical stress while the carpet is wet and structurally weakened.

When carpet becomes wet, the latex adhesives bonding the backing layers soften and lose strength. If technicians pull, drag, or disengage carpet incorrectly—especially without proper tools such as knee kickers or power stretchers—the weakened backing can separate. The WRT manual emphasizes that wet carpet must be handled carefully and evenly to avoid introducing avoidable secondary damage.

Ambient conditions above dew point, antimicrobial application, or tuft bind strength alone do not typically cause delamination. While shrinkage and tuft bind issues may occur during improper drying, delamination is most often associated withphysical mishandlingduring lifting or removal.

The WRT curriculum stresses that secondary damage caused by improper techniques is the responsibility of the restorer. Proper disengaging methods, correct tools, and controlled handling are essential to preserve restorable carpet systems and reduce liability.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge states that wastewater generated during water damage restoration must be disposed ofin accordance with applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Wastewater may contain contaminants, sediments, microorganisms, or chemical residues, and improper disposal can create environmental and public health risks.

The WRT manual emphasizes that restorers are responsible for understanding disposal requirements within the jurisdiction where work is performed. These requirements may regulate where wastewater can be discharged (e.g., sanitary sewer systems) and prohibit disposal into storm drains, onto soil, or into surface waters. Disposal practices may also vary depending on contamination category, such as sewage or chemically contaminated water.

OSHA regulations focus on worker safety, not wastewater disposal. AHAM standards apply to appliance performance testing, not environmental disposal. ANSI/IICRC S520 addresses mold remediation, not wastewater handling. Therefore, none of those documents define wastewater disposal requirements.

By following applicable laws and regulations, restorers ensure environmental compliance, protect public infrastructure, and reduce legal liability. This requirement reflects the WRT emphasis on regulatory awareness and responsible professional conduct.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge clearly states that before applying an antimicrobial (biocide), a technician must obtaindocumented authorization from the owner or occupant, or another legally authorized representative of the property. This requirement exists because antimicrobial application involves introducing regulated chemical agents into an occupied environment, which carries potential health, legal, and liability implications.

The WRT manual emphasizes informed consent as a professional and ethical obligation. Owners or occupants must be made aware of the purpose, limitations, and potential risks associated with antimicrobial use. Documented authorization protects all materially interested parties by confirming that the decision to apply a biocide was disclosed, understood, and approved.

Insurance adjusters do not have authority over health decisions within a structure, reconstruction contractors do not represent occupancy interests, and physicians are not responsible for property treatment approvals. The responsibility lies with the property owner or occupant.

This requirement aligns with EPA pesticide regulations and the ANSI/IICRC S500 Standard, reinforcing transparency, safety, and defensibility in restoration practices.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge identifiescellulosic insulationas a material that must beremoved and discarded when wet. Cellulose insulation is highly absorbent and loses its insulating properties once saturated. It also retains moisture for extended periods, creating conditions conducive to microbial growth and secondary damage.

The WRT manual explains that wet cellulose insulation cannot be effectively dried in place due to its density and the way it traps moisture within wall cavities. Attempting to dry or clean it is unreliable and inconsistent with professional standards. Removal allows the wall cavity and surrounding materials to dry properly and be inspected for hidden damage.

Evaluating R-value or expansion is irrelevant once the insulation is wet. Reinstallation of new insulation may occur after drying is complete and conditions permit.

This guidance reflects the WRT emphasis on material restorability, moisture control, and prevention of long-term problems within concealed assemblies.

Dew point temperature is the temperature at which an air mass becomes saturated (100% RH) and can hold no more water vapor. In WRT psychrometry, this is a critical “threshold” condition because any additional cooling of the air (at the same moisture content) forces water vapor to change state and condense onto cooler surfaces. The WRT body of knowledge emphasizes that as air is cooled, its capacity to hold water vapor decreases until RH reaches 100%, which is the dew point condition.

In water damage restoration, dew point is used operationally to manage secondary damage risk and to confirm drying potential. The WRT reference explains that restorers compare the dew point of the indoor air (often the most humid air mass in the structure) to material surface temperatures throughout the affected environment. If a surface temperature is below the dew point, condensation will occur on that surface, potentially increasing moisture loading and causing secondary damage. Conversely, when surface temperatures are warmer than the dew point of the surrounding air, evaporation potential increases, supporting restorative drying.

Because dew point is directly related to humidity ratio and vapor pressure, it also functions as a practical indicator of “how wet the air really is” regardless of temperature changes. This is why dew point is repeatedly referenced alongside vapor pressure and humidity ratio as a foundational psychrometric measurement used to evaluate drying systems and to prevent condensation events during mitigation.

==========

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains that oncefinished wood flooringhas reached its documented drying goal, restoration is not automatically complete. Wood is a hygroscopic material that responds slowly to environmental changes, and even after reaching target moisture content, it may requireadditional acclimation timeto stabilize before refinishing or repair.

The WRT manual emphasizes that premature sanding or refinishing can lead to dimensional changes after finishing, resulting in crowning, cupping, gaps, or finish failure. Allowing acclimation ensures the flooring equilibrates with the normal indoor environment, reducing the risk of post-restoration damage.

Drying goals are established by comparing affected wood to unaffected reference materials within the same structure or similar microclimate. Achieving those goals confirms that moisture removal is complete, but not that the wood has fully stabilized. This distinction is critical in professional restoration practice and is repeatedly reinforced in the WRT curriculum.

Immediate refinishing is discouraged unless confirmed by flooring professionals or manufacturer guidelines. Likewise, removal due to contamination is a separate determination based on water category, not drying completion. The WRT standard encourages coordination with flooring specialists when needed, reinforcing the importance of sequencing and patience after drying is achieved.

Athermo-hygrometeris the instrument identified in the IICRC WRT body of knowledge for measuring bothair temperature and relative humidity. These two measurements are fundamental inputs for psychrometric evaluation and drying documentation.

The WRT curriculum explains that accurate air readings allow restorers to calculate additional psychrometric values such as humidity ratio, dew point, and vapor pressure—either manually or using built-in instrument calculations. These values are critical for assessing drying conditions, equipment performance, and the effectiveness of the drying strategy.

Moisture meters and moisture sensors are used to measure moisture in materials, not air. A thermometer measures temperature only and cannot determine moisture content or humidity conditions. The thermo-hygrometer integrates both functions into a single instrument, making it a required tool for daily monitoring under the WRT standard of care.

The WRT manual further stresses consistency in air measurements, recommending similar measurement locations and procedures during each monitoring visit to ensure defensible documentation.

Gypsum board (drywall) is identified in the WRT body of knowledge as highly vulnerable to moisture exposure, yet capable of recovering strength when dried—provided it has not sustained irreversible primary damage. The WRT manual explains that gypsum wallboard is among the most moisture-sensitive common building materials, showing rapid and dramatic change with elevated moisture levels. However, it also states that gypsum has a greater ability to recover than many other engineered products.

Critically, the WRT guidance distinguishes between primary damage (immediate structural failure) and recoverable wetting. For example, overhead or horizontally installed gypsum that becomes wet can lose structural integrity, sag, and create a significant safety concern; this sagging is considered permanent damage and requires removal.

In contrast, when gypsum board installed vertically on walls is wet but has not experienced primary damage (e.g., not structurally compromised, not severely deteriorated, and appropriate contamination considerations are addressed), the WRT manual notes that it can restore: during the drying process, gypsum’s original strength is restored, and after drying it may even be slightly stronger (though sometimes more brittle). This recovery characteristic is what makes gypsum board the best match to the question’s description—losing structural integrity when wet yet regaining strength when properly dried.

This material behavior is central to WRT decision-making: whether to dry in place, perform limited disruption (e.g., baseboard removal and cavity airflow), or remove materials for safety/health reasons. The WRT body of knowledge treats gypsum as potentially restorable depending on installation orientation, degree of damage, and contamination risk, which is why it is specifically described as losing integrity when wet and regaining strength when dry.

==========

The IICRC WRT guidance uses an initial air-mover recommendation based on affected surface area to support evaporation across wet materials. The WRT manual summarizes the S500-based starting method: (1) place one air mover for each affected area, then (2) add one air mover for every 50 to 70 square feet of affected floor area, and then consider additional adjustments for offsets/insets and other complexities as applicable.

Here, the room is a single affected area and the entire floor is wet. The floor area is 15 × 25 = 375 square feet. Using the WRT/S500 initial guidance, the floor-area addition is:

• High end: 375 ÷ 50 = 7.5 → round up to 8 air movers

• Low end: 375 ÷ 70 = 5.36 → round up to 6 air movers

Then include the “one per affected area” base air mover for the room. That yields an initial range of 7 to 9 total air movers (1 + 6 to 1 + 8). This matches the correct selection range.

The scenario also states wall wicking is minimal (less than 2 feet) and there are no offsets, so the wall-above-2-feet rule and offset additions do not apply in the initial count. The objective at this stage is continuous airflow across wet surfaces to maintain a low-humidity boundary layer at the material surface, supporting rapid evaporation. The WRT manual further notes that airflow needs vary by the amount of wet surface area, accessibility, and other field limitations, and professional judgment may require adjustment after monitoring confirms actual drying progress.

==========

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge states thatcarpet cushion (pad, underlay) must be removed and discarded when affected by Category 2 or Category 3 water. Carpet cushion is a porous material that readily absorbs and retains contaminants, making effective cleaning and decontamination impractical under these conditions.

The WRT manual explains that even if the overlying carpet may be cleanable in some situations, cushion acts like a sponge and can harbor microorganisms, nutrients, and moisture deep within its structure. Attempting to dry or disinfect contaminated cushion poses a health risk and increases the likelihood of secondary damage or odor problems.

While certain cushion types (such as synthetic felt or cushions with skins) influence restorability in Category 1 losses, contamination level takes precedence. The presence of Category 2 or 3 water alone is sufficient to require removal, regardless of cushion construction or subfloor type.

This guidance reflects the WRT emphasis on protecting occupant health and preventing hidden contamination. Removing and discarding contaminated cushion is considered the appropriate and defensible standard of care.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge defines aclosed drying systemas one in which indoor air is isolated from outdoor air, relying on mechanical dehumidification rather than ventilation. A closed system is recommendedwhen the outdoor humidity ratio is higher than the indoor humidity ratio.

Introducing outside air with a higher humidity ratio would add moisture to the drying environment, reducing evaporation potential and increasing the risk of secondary damage. The WRT manual emphasizes that ventilation decisions must be based on psychrometric comparison—not convenience or assumptions about temperature.

Closed systems allow restorers to control indoor conditions precisely using dehumidifiers, air movers, and temperature management. This approach is particularly important during humid weather, rain events, or in climates where outdoor air consistently contains more moisture than indoor air.

Building security, equipment monitoring frequency, or the availability of dry outdoor air do not determine whether a closed system is appropriate. The determining factor is always moisture content of the air.

This guidance reinforces the WRT principle that effective drying depends oncontrolling vapor pressure differentials, which can only be achieved by preventing moisture-laden air from entering the drying chamber.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge stresses thatdocumentation is a critical component of professional water damage restoration, and restorers are expected to obtain and maintain documents that validate drying progress and project completion. These records demonstrate that drying goals were properly established, monitored, and achieved in accordance with the ANSI/IICRC S500 Standard.

Drying documentation typically includes moisture content or moisture level readings, moisture maps, psychrometric data (temperature, relative humidity, humidity ratio, and dew point), equipment placement records, and daily monitoring logs. Together, these documents form a defensible record that shows the restorer followed an appropriate standard of care.

The WRT manual explains that such documentation is necessary not only for communication with materially interested parties (owners, occupants, insurers) but also for dispute resolution, quality assurance, and potential legal proceedings. Without validated drying documentation, it is difficult to prove that materials were returned to a dry standard or that secondary damage was prevented.

AHAM certificates may be useful for understanding equipment performance, but they are not required project documents. Law enforcement permission and historical restoration records are unrelated to the drying verification process. Therefore, obtaining documents that validate drying and completion is the correct and required practice under WRT guidance.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge definesCategory 2 wateras water that contains significant contamination and has the potential to cause discomfort or illness if contacted or consumed. This classification recognizes that while Category 2 water is not grossly contaminated like Category 3, it is no longer considered clean or sanitary.

Examples commonly cited in the WRT manual include dishwasher or washing machine discharge, toilet overflows with urine but no feces, and seepage due to hydrostatic pressure. These sources may contain microorganisms, nutrients for microbial growth, or other contaminants that pose health concerns.

The WRT standard emphasizes that Category 2 water presents anelevated health riskand requires enhanced controls compared to Category 1. This may include increased PPE, more aggressive cleaning, and careful evaluation of materials for restorability. Porous materials affected by Category 2 water may need to be removed depending on exposure time and degree of absorption.

Importantly, the WRT body of knowledge highlights that water candegrade in categoryover time if left untreated. Category 2 water can become Category 3 due to microbial amplification, reinforcing the importance of timely mitigation and proper classification during the initial inspection.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge defineshumidity ratioas theamount (or weight) of water vapor contained in a given weight of dry air. It is typically expressed as grains per pound (GPP) or grams per kilogram and represents an absolute measurement of moisture in the air.

Unlike relative humidity, humidity ratio does not change with temperature unless moisture is added or removed. This makes it one of the most reliable psychrometric measurements for evaluating drying potential and comparing indoor and outdoor air conditions.

The WRT manual emphasizes that humidity ratio is critical for determining vapor pressure, dew point, and the suitability of ventilation drying. Restorers frequently rely on humidity ratio to decide whether introducing outdoor air will improve or hinder drying.

Moisture content applies to materials, not air, and relative humidity is a percentage comparison rather than a mass measurement. Therefore, humidity ratio is the correct and precise term under WRT psychrometric science.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge states that whenhigh-risk individuals(such as the elderly, infants, immunocompromised persons, or those with respiratory conditions) are present during aCategory 3 water intrusion, anIndoor Environmental Professional (IEP)should be retained.

Category 3 water is grossly contaminated and poses significant health risks. The WRT manual explains that an IEP provides independent assessment, sampling strategies, and recommendations to protect occupant health and guide appropriate remediation decisions.

Increasing equipment or focusing on AHAM ratings does not address health risk evaluation. Mold testing is not automatically required and may not be appropriate during active mitigation.

Retaining an IEP ensures objective decision-making, regulatory alignment, and enhanced protection for vulnerable occupants, consistent with IICRC guidance.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge definesClass 4 water intrusionas a condition involvingdeeply held or bound waterwithin materials such as hardwood, plaster, brick, concrete, or other dense assemblies. These materials do not readily release moisture through normal evaporation and therefore requirespecialized drying methods.

Class 4 losses are distinct from Class 1–3 intrusions, which involve progressively greater amounts of free and absorbed water. In Class 4 situations, water is chemically or physically bound within the material matrix, significantly slowing drying rates.

The WRT manual emphasizes that Class 4 drying often requires advanced techniques such as desiccant dehumidification, controlled heat, or extended drying times. Monitoring must be especially thorough to ensure moisture reduction without causing damage.

Understanding Class 4 conditions is critical for proper equipment selection, time expectations, and justification of extended drying strategies under the IICRC standard of care.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains thatmultiple extractionsof carpet and cushion are performed toreduce moisture content and decrease drying time. Initial extraction removes bulk water, but additional extractions—particularly after capillary movement redistributes moisture—can significantly reduce the remaining moisture load.

Repeated extraction lowers the amount of water that must be removed through evaporation, allowing dehumidification and airflow to work more efficiently. The WRT manual emphasizes that effective extraction is one of the most cost-effective and impactful steps in minimizing overall drying duration.

Multiple extractions do not eliminate microbial growth directly and do not replace proper drying or antimicrobial use when appropriate. Instead, they reduce moisture availability, which indirectly limits microbial amplification.

The WRT curriculum reinforces extraction as a critical early-stage drying strategy that supports faster, more controlled restoration.

As moisture evaporates from a wet material, the surface temperature of that material typically becomes cooler. This occurs because evaporation requires energy (heat) to change water from a liquid phase into a vapor phase. In restorative drying, that energy is drawn from the material and its immediate environment, producing a cooling effect at the evaporation interface commonly referred to as “evaporative cooling.” The WRT body of knowledge explicitly states that as moisture evaporates from wet material, the surface becomes cooler because energy is released from the material during the phase change.

This cooling effect is not just theoretical; it is used in field practice to help locate moisture. TheWRT reference explains that thermal imaging cameras often “detect” wet areas primarily by observing cooler surface temperatures associated with evaporative cooling. Where evaporation is occurring, cooling typically occurs, and those cooler signatures can help identify areas that may be wet—subject to confirmation with moisture meters due to potential false readings.

From a drying-system perspective, evaporative cooling also helps explain why increasing air movement, controlling humidity, and managing temperature are interdependent. If evaporation is strong, the surface cools, which can reduce evaporation potential unless the system supplies adequate energy (heat) and maintains low vapor pressure in the surrounding air. Thus, the “cooler surface” outcome is an expected physical consequence of evaporation and a measurable indicator that the drying process is actively occurring at the material boundary.

==========

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge provides guidance for determining initial dehumidification capacity based oncubic footage,class of water, andtype of dehumidifier. ForClass 1 water intrusions, which involve minimal moisture absorption and evaporation primarily from structural materials, the recommended starting point is approximatelyone LGR dehumidifier per 10,000 to 12,000 cubic feetof affected space.

In this scenario, the basement volume is 22,000 cubic feet. Applying the WRT initial calculation method, dividing 22,000 cubic feet by 10,000–12,000 cubic feet per unit results in a requirement of approximatelytwo LGR dehumidifiers. Although six units are available on the truck, the WRT standard emphasizes that equipment placement should be based on need—not availability. Over-dehumidification can be inefficient, unnecessary, and difficult to justify to materially interested parties.

The WRT manual also stresses that this is aninitial recommendation, subject to adjustment after psychrometric monitoring confirms whether drying goals are being met. Because the structure is vacant and the intrusion is Class 1, the moisture load is relatively low, and excessive equipment would not improve drying efficiency. Instead, proper airflow, monitoring, and controlled humidity reduction are the priority.

This approach aligns with IICRC principles that restorers should place sufficient equipment to create effective drying conditions without introducing waste, excessive power consumption, or unjustified costs.

The IICRC WRT body of knowledge explains that whenoutdoor humidity ratio is significantly lower than indoor humidity ratio, and outdoor temperature is equal to or higher than indoor temperature, a restorer may consider using anopen drying system.

An open drying system introduces outside air to replace moist indoor air, reducing the indoor humidity ratio and vapor pressure. When the incoming air is warmer and drier, it enhances evaporation and supports moisture removal without relying solely on mechanical dehumidification.

The WRT manual stresses that ventilation decisions must be based on psychrometric comparison—not assumptions about comfort. Using outside air under favorable conditions can be energy-efficient and effective, but only when conditions are continuously monitored.

A closed system would be counterproductive in this scenario, as it would trap higher-moisture air inside the drying chamber. Increasing indoor humidity or expecting reduced evaporation contradicts drying physics.