ECCouncil 312-50v13 Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEHv13) Exam Practice Test

A digital signature mechanism is a cryptographic concept that you should propose to the team to verify the integrity of the data upon retrieval. A digital signature mechanism works as follows:

A digital signature is a mathematical scheme that allows the sender of a message to sign the message with their private key, and allows the receiver of the message to verify the signature with the sender’s public key. A digital signature provides two security services: authentication and non-repudiation. Authentication means that the receiver can confirm the identity of the sender, and non-repudiation means that the sender cannot deny sending the message12.

A digital signature mechanism consists of three algorithms: key generation, signing, and verification. Key generation produces a pair of keys: a private key for the sender and a public key for the receiver. Signing takes the message and the private key as inputs, and outputs a signature. Verification takes the message, the signature, and the public key as inputs, and outputs a boolean value indicating whether the signature is valid or not12.

A digital signature mechanism can be implemented using various cryptographic techniques, such as hash-based signatures, RSA signatures, or elliptic curve signatures. A common method is to use a hash function to compress the message into a fixed-length digest, and then use an asymmetric encryption algorithm to encrypt the digest with the private key. The encrypted digest is the signature, which can be decrypted with the public key and compared with the hash of the message to verify the integrity12.

A digital signature mechanism can ensure the integrity of the data upon retrieval, because:

A digital signature is unique to the message and the sender, and it cannot be forged or altered by anyone else. If the message or the signature is modified in any way, the verification will fail and the receiver will know that the data is corrupted or tampered with12.

A digital signature is independent of the encryption or hashing of the data, and it can be applied to any type of data, regardless of its format or size. The encryption or hashing of the data can provide confidentiality and efficiency, but they cannot provide integrity or authentication by themselves. A digital signature can complement the encryption or hashing of the data by providing an additional layer of security12.

The other options are not as suitable as option B for the following reasons:

A. Implement a block cipher mode of operation: This option is not relevant because it does not address the integrity verification issue, but the encryption issue. A block cipher mode of operation is a method of applying a block cipher, which is a symmetric encryption algorithm that operates on fixed-length blocks of data, to a variable-length message. A block cipher mode of operation can provide different security properties, such as confidentiality, integrity, or authenticity, depending on the mode. However, a block cipher mode of operation cannot provide a digital signature, which is a form of asymmetric encryption that uses a pair of keys3 .

C. Suggest using salt with hashing: This option is not sufficient because it does not provide a digital signature, but only a hash value. Salt is a random value that is added to the input of a hash function, which is a one-way function that maps any data to a fixed-length digest. Salt can enhance the security of hashing by making it harder to perform brute-force attacks or dictionary attacks, which are methods of finding the input that produces a given hash value. However, salt cannot provide a digital signature, which is a two-way function that uses a pair of keys to sign and verify a message .

D. Switch to elliptic curve cryptography: This option is not specific because it does not specify a digital signature mechanism, but only a type of cryptography. Elliptic curve cryptography is a branch of cryptography that uses mathematical curves to generate keys and perform operations. Elliptic curve cryptography can be used to implement various cryptographic techniques, such as encryption, hashing, or digital signatures. However, elliptic curve cryptography is not a digital signature mechanism by itself, but rather a tool that can be used to create one .

A honeypot may be a trap that an IT pro lays for a malicious hacker, hoping that they will interact with it during a way that gives useful intelligence. It’s one among the oldest security measures in IT, but beware: luring hackers onto your network, even on an isolated system, are often a dangerous game.

honeypot may be a good starting place: “A honeypot may be a computer or computing system intended to mimic likely targets of cyberattacks.” Often a honeypot are going to be deliberately configured with known vulnerabilities in situation to form a more tempting or obvious target for attackers. A honeypot won’t contain production data or participate in legitimate traffic on your network — that’s how you’ll tell anything happening within it’s a results of an attack. If someone’s stopping by, they’re up to no good.

That definition covers a various array of systems, from bare-bones virtual machines that only offer a couple of vulnerable systems to ornately constructed fake networks spanning multiple servers. and therefore the goals of these who build honeypots can vary widely also , starting from defense thorough to academic research. additionally , there’s now an entire marketing category of deception technology that, while not meeting the strict definition of a honeypot, is certainly within the same family. But we’ll get thereto during a moment.

honeypots aim to permit close analysis of how hackers do their dirty work. The team controlling the honeypot can watch the techniques hackers use to infiltrate systems, escalate privileges, and otherwise run amok through target networks. These sorts of honeypots are found out by security companies, academics, and government agencies looking to look at the threat landscape. Their creators could also be curious about learning what kind of attacks are out there, getting details on how specific sorts of attacks work, or maybe trying to lure a specific hackers within the hopes of tracing the attack back to its source. These systems are often inbuilt fully isolated lab environments, which ensures that any breaches don’t end in non-honeypot machines falling prey to attacks.

Production honeypots, on the opposite hand, are usually deployed in proximity to some organization’s production infrastructure, though measures are taken to isolate it the maximum amount as possible. These honeypots often serve both as bait to distract hackers who could also be trying to interrupt into that organization’s network, keeping them faraway from valuable data or services; they will also function a canary within the coalpit , indicating that attacks are underway and are a minimum of partially succeeding.

Josh is preparing to send the payload (malicious file) to the target, which clearly maps to the Delivery phase of the Cyber Kill Chain.

According to CEH v13 and the Cyber Kill Chain model (developed by Lockheed Martin and used in ethical hacking methodology):

Delivery is the third phase of the kill chain.

It involves transmitting the weaponized payload to the target via phishing emails, USB drops, or malicious links.

In this case, Josh is preparing the email with a spoofed identity and malicious attachment — representing an act of delivery.

Incorrect options:

A. Exploitation occurs after delivery, when the payload is executed.

B. Weaponization is the phase where the malicious file is created (combining exploit with a backdoor or trojan).

D. Reconnaissance involves information gathering, completed earlier in the scenario.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 01: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Section: “Cyber Kill Chain Model”

Table Reference: “Stages of a Cyber Attack”

CEH Engage Lab: “Kill Chain Simulation in Phishing Campaigns”

Hashing is a one-way function—by design, it cannot be reversed. Password-cracking tools do not "reverse" the hash. Instead, they:

Generate a list of potential passwords.

Hash each candidate using the same algorithm.

Compare the result to the target hash.

If a match is found, the original password is revealed by correlation, not reversal.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Cryptography and Password Cracking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Hash functions are one-way and irreversible. Password-cracking tools work by hashing wordlists or character combinations and comparing them to known password hashes.”

Symmetric encryption is a method of encrypting and decrypting data using the same secret key. Symmetric encryption is fast and efficient, but it requires a secure way of managing and distributing the keys to the users who need them. If the keys are compromised, the data is no longer secure.

One of the strategies to securely manage and distribute symmetric keys is to use HTTPS protocol for secure key transfer. HTTPS is a protocol that uses SSL/TLS to encrypt the communication between a client and a server over the Internet. HTTPS can protect the symmetric keys from being intercepted or modified by an attacker during the key transfer process. HTTPS can also authenticate the server and the client using certificates, ensuring that the keys are sent to and received by the intended parties.

To use HTTPS protocol for secure key transfer, the development team needs to implement the following steps1:

Generate a symmetric key for each user who wants to store their files on the cloud storage platform. The symmetric key will be used to encrypt and decrypt the user’s files.

Generate a certificate for the cloud storage server. The certificate will contain the server’s public key and other information, such as the server’s domain name, the issuer, and the validity period. The certificate will be signed by a trusted certificate authority (CA), which is a third-party entity that verifies the identity and legitimacy of the server.

Install the certificate on the cloud storage server and configure the server to use HTTPS protocol for communication.

When a user wants to upload or download their files, the user’s client (such as a web browser or an app) will initiate a HTTPS connection with the cloud storage server. The client will verify the server’s certificate and establish a secure session with the server using SSL/TLS. The client and the server will negotiate a session key, which is a temporary symmetric key that will be used to encrypt the data exchanged during the session.

The cloud storage server will send the user’s symmetric key to the user’s client, encrypted with the session key. The user’s client will decrypt the symmetric key with the session key and use it to encrypt or decrypt the user’s files.

The user’s client will store the symmetric key securely on the user’s device, such as in a password-protected file or a hardware token. The user’s client will also delete the session key after the session is over.

Using HTTPS protocol for secure key transfer can ensure that the symmetric keys are protected from eavesdropping, tampering, or spoofing attacks. However, this strategy also has some challenges and limitations, such as:

The development team needs to obtain and maintain valid certificates for the cloud storage server from a trusted CA, which might incur costs and administrative overhead.

The users need to trust the CA that issued the certificates for the cloud storage server and verify the certificates before accepting them.

The users need to protect their symmetric keys from being lost, stolen, or corrupted on their devices. The development team needs to provide a mechanism for key backup, recovery, or revocation in case of such events.

The users need to update their symmetric keys periodically to prevent key exhaustion or reuse attacks. The development team needs to provide a mechanism for key rotation or renewal in a secure and efficient manner.

The honey trap is a technique where an attacker targets a person online by pretending to be an attractive person and then begins a fake online relationship to obtain confidential information about the target company. In this technique, the victim is an insider who possesses critical information about the target organization.

Baiting is a technique in which attackers offer end users something alluring in exchange for

important information such as login details and other sensitive data. This technique relies on

the curiosity and greed of the end-users. Attackers perform this technique by leaving a physical

device such as a USB flash drive containing malicious files in locations where people can easily

find them, such as parking lots, elevators, and bathrooms. This physical device is labeled with a

legitimate company's logo, thereby tricking end-users into trusting it and opening it on their

systems. Once the victim connects and opens the device, a malicious file downloads. It infects

the system and allows the attacker to take control.

For example, an attacker leaves some bait in the form of a USB drive in the elevator with the

label "Employee Salary Information 2019" and a legitimate company's logo. Out of curiosity and

greed, the victim picks up the device and opens it up on their system, which downloads the

bait. Once the bait is downloaded, a piece of malicious software installs on the victim's system,

giving the attacker access.

According to CEH v13 Module 08: Sniffing, the attack described is a classic example of ARP spoofing/poisoning which leads to Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) scenarios. In such attacks, a malicious actor sends forged ARP responses to associate their MAC address with the IP address of a target system, redirecting traffic through their machine.

Tool Used: BetterCAP

BetterCAP is a powerful, modular MITM framework.

It can:

Perform ARP spoofing

Intercept and manipulate HTTP/HTTPS traffic

Modify packets in real-time

Carry out credential harvesting and session hijacking

Miley's actions match the default behavior of BetterCAP during an ARP spoofing attack:

Spoof ARP to redirect traffic.

Intercept and analyze (or manipulate) traffic.

Option Clarification:

A. Gobbler: An older ARP tool, but mostly for ARP scanning, not modern MITM attacks.

B. KDerpNSpoof: Incorrect or misspelled; not a recognized CEH tool.

C. BetterCAP: Correct – used for ARP spoofing and traffic manipulation.

D. Wireshark: Passive sniffer; cannot perform ARP spoofing or MITM.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The “weakest link” in cybersecurity is almost always the human element. Even with cutting-edge technology and airtight configurations, untrained or careless users can fall for phishing attacks, use weak passwords, or mishandle sensitive data — giving hackers a path into the system.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 7: Social Engineering

Topic: Human Element in Security Breaches

Most ping programs use ICMP echo requests and wait for echo replies to come back to test connectivity. Hping2 allows us to do the same testing using any IP packet, including ICMP, UDP, and TCP. This can be helpful since nowadays most firewalls or routers block ICMP. Hping2, by default, will use TCP, but, if you still want to send an ICMP scan, you can. We send ICMP scans using the -1 (one) mode. Basically the syntax will be hping2 -1 IPADDRESS

[root@localhost hping2-rc3]# hping2 -1 192.168.0.100

HPING 192.168.0.100 (eth0 192.168.0.100): icmp mode set, 28 headers + 0 data bytes

len=46 ip=192.168.0.100 ttl=128 id=27118 icmp_seq=0 rtt=14.9 ms

len=46 ip=192.168.0.100 ttl=128 id=27119 icmp_seq=1 rtt=0.5 ms

len=46 ip=192.168.0.100 ttl=128 id=27120 icmp_seq=2 rtt=0.5 ms

len=46 ip=192.168.0.100 ttl=128 id=27121 icmp_seq=3 rtt=1.5 ms

len=46 ip=192.168.0.100 ttl=128 id=27122 icmp_seq=4 rtt=0.9 ms

— 192.168.0.100 hping statistic —

5 packets tramitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max = 0.5/3.7/14.9 ms

[root@localhost hping2-rc3]#

In CEH v13 Module 06: Malware Threats, the Cyber Kill Chain is broken down into its seven stages:

Reconnaissance

Weaponization

Delivery

Exploitation

Installation

Command & Control

Actions on Objectives

Step 3 – Delivery:

Refers to the transmission of the malicious payload to the victim.

Can occur through email, web downloads, USB drives, etc.

Correct Example:

A. “An intruder sends a malicious attachment via email to a target” — This is delivery.

Other Options:

B. Weaponization

C. Exploitation

D. Installation

The network is using an uncrackable encryption method, which makes it difficult to crack the Wi-Fi password. WPA2 Personal with AES encryption is the strongest form of security offered by Wi-Fi devices at the moment, and it should be used for all purposes. AES stands for Advanced Encryption Standard, and it is a symmetric-key algorithm that uses a 128-bit, 192-bit, or 256-bit key to encrypt and decrypt data. AES is considered to be uncrackable by brute force attacks, as it would take an impractical amount of time and computational power to try all possible key combinations12. Therefore, unless you have access to the Wi-Fi password or the encryption key, you will not be able to decrypt the network traffic and crack the password.

The other options are not correct for the following reasons:

A. The Wi-Fi password is too complex and long: This option is not relevant because the Wi-Fi password is not directly used to encrypt the network traffic. Instead, the password is used to generate a Pre-Shared Key (PSK), which is then used to derive a Pairwise Master Key (PMK), which is then used to derive a Pairwise Transient Key (PTK), which is then used to encrypt the data. Therefore, the complexity and length of the password do not affect the encryption strength, as long as the password is not easily guessed or leaked34.

B. Your hacking tool is outdated: This option is not plausible because even if your hacking tool is outdated, it would not affect your ability to capture the network traffic and attempt to crack the password. The hacking tool may not support the latest Wi-Fi standards or protocols, but it should still be able to capture the raw data packets and save them in a file. The cracking process would depend on the encryption algorithm and the key, not on the hacking tool.

D. The network is using MAC address filtering: This option is not feasible because MAC address filtering is a technique that restricts network access and communication to trusted devices based on their MAC addresses, which are unique identifiers assigned to network interfaces. MAC address filtering can prevent unauthorized devices from joining the network, but it cannot prevent authorized devices from capturing the network traffic. Moreover, MAC address filtering can be easily bypassed by spoofing the MAC address of an allowed device56.

The scenario describes a cryptographic attack where the attacker (in this case, the student) uses a predefined list of commonly used passwords to try and unlock a secured PDF document. This technique is known as a Dictionary Attack.

According to the CEH v13 Official Courseware:

A Dictionary Attack is defined as “a method of breaking passwords by trying out a predefined list of words (dictionary) commonly used as passwords.”

Unlike a brute-force attack, which tries every possible character combination, a dictionary attack relies on known or likely password choices, which makes it faster but less exhaustive.

Dictionary attacks are commonly used against encrypted or password-protected files, login forms, and even hashes.

Relevant distinctions from other options:

A. Man-in-the-middle attack involves intercepting communication between two parties and is unrelated to offline password cracking.

B. Brute-force attack tries all possible character combinations, not just a list of known or common passwords.

D. Session hijacking involves taking over a user session and is unrelated to document password cracking.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Materials:

Module 20: Cryptography

Section: "Cryptanalysis Techniques"

Subsection: "Dictionary Attack vs. Brute-force Attack"

CEH v13 eBook or Study Guide — look for Table: “Types of Password Attacks” under “Cryptography Attack Vectors”

This exact technique is illustrated in CEH v13 labs involving John the Ripper, Hydra, and password recovery tools.

A TCP/IP hijack is an attack that spoofs a server into thinking it’s talking with a sound client, once actually it’s communication with an assaulter that has condemned (or hijacked) the tcp session. Assume that the client has administrator-level privileges, which the attacker needs to steal that authority so as to form a brand new account with root-level access of the server to be used afterward. A tcp Hijacking is sort of a two-phased man-in-the-middle attack. The man-in-the-middle assaulter lurks within the circuit between a shopper and a server so as to work out what port and sequence numbers are being employed for the conversation.

First, the attacker knocks out the client with an attack, like Ping of Death, or ties it up with some reasonably ICMP storm. This renders the client unable to transmit any packets to the server. Then, with the client crashed, the attacker assumes the client’s identity so as to talk with the server. By this suggests, the attacker gains administrator-level access to the server.

One of the most effective means of preventing a hijack attack is to want a secret, that’s a shared secret between the shopper and also the server. looking on the strength of security desired, the key may be used for random exchanges. this is often once a client and server periodically challenge each other, or it will occur with each exchange, like Kerberos.

True Positive - IDS referring a behavior as an attack, in real life it is

True Negative - IDS referring a behavior not an attack and in real life it is not

False Positive - IDS referring a behavior as an attack, in real life it is not

False Negative - IDS referring a behavior not an attack, but in real life is an attack.

False Negative - is the most serious and dangerous state of all !!!!

The scenario describes a situation where a hacker infects an internet-facing server and leverages it to perform malicious activities such as sending spam emails, participating in distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, or hosting spam content. This behavior is characteristic of a Botnet Trojan.

According to the CEH v13 Official Courseware and Study Guide:

A Botnet Trojan is a type of malware that transforms infected machines into bots (also called zombies), which can be remotely controlled by an attacker (bot herder or bot master).

These bots become part of a botnet — a network of compromised machines used for coordinated cyberattacks including:

Sending unsolicited spam emails (junk mail)

Participating in DDoS attacks

Hosting or distributing malware and phishing content

The infected machine can receive commands from a command-and-control (C&C) server and act in concert with other infected machines to amplify attacks or spread malware.

Incorrect Options:

B. Banking Trojans are designed specifically to steal financial data such as online banking credentials.

C. Turtle Trojans is not a valid classification in CEH v13 or cybersecurity literature (may be a distractor).

D. Ransomware Trojans encrypt data and demand a ransom for decryption, not typically used for junk mail or botnet activities.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 06: Malware Threats

Section: “Types of Trojans”

Subsection: “Botnet Trojans”

CEH v13 eBook or Study Guide — usually found under “Trojan Classifications by Payload”

Practical labs in CEH Engage and iLabs also demonstrate botnet functionality using tools like Zeus and Emotet in real-world botnet infection scenarios.

A digital signature is created by hashing the document and encrypting that hash with the sender’s private key. Since the hash is specific to the original content, any change to the document invalidates the signature, making it non-transferable to another document.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 20: Cryptography

Quote:

“Digital signatures are based on hashing the document and signing the digest with the private key. This makes each signature unique to the document and ensures tamper resistance.”

Incorrect Options:

B. Incorrect — signature is tied to one document.

C. Hashes are not plain; they are encrypted.

D. Keys can be reused, but signatures are document-specific.

SOX stands for Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It is a U.S. federal law enacted to protect shareholders and the general public from accounting errors and corporate fraud.

Key points:

Requires strict internal controls and financial disclosures in publicly traded companies.

Mandates regular audits and IT security controls related to financial data.

Applies especially to accounting systems, databases, access controls, and IT procedures related to financial reporting.

Incorrect Options:

A. PCI-DSS relates to securing credit card data.

B. FISMA pertains to federal agency cybersecurity standards.

D. ISO/IEC 27001:2013 is an international information security standard, not a legal requirement for financial integrity.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 01: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Section: “Compliance and Legal Concepts”

Table: "Major Laws and Regulations in Information Security"

===========

In CEH v13 Module 16: Cloud Computing and Container Security, Cloudborne attacks are described as threats specific to bare-metal cloud infrastructure.

Characteristics of a Cloudborne Attack:

Targets firmware-level vulnerabilities in reused physical servers.

Malware or backdoors can persist even after VM or OS reinstallation.

Can lead to compromise of new tenants or clients once servers are reallocated.

First highlighted in Project X by Eclypsium.

Option Clarification:

A. MITC: Exploits synchronization in cloud storage, not firmware.

B. Cryptojacking: Mining cryptocurrency using cloud resources.

C. Cloudborne attack: Correct — targets firmware on bare-metal cloud servers.

D. Metadata spoofing: Exploits cloud instance metadata services, unrelated to firmware.

Web Server Attacks - DNS Server Hijacking Attacker compromises the DNS server and changes the DNS settings so that all the requests coming towards the target web server are redirected to his/her own malicious server. (P.1623/1607)

A NULL scan is a type of TCP scan where no TCP flags are set in the packet. This unconventional packet is used to evade firewalls and intrusion detection systems and to determine the state of a port based on the response.

Behavior:

Open port → No response

Closed port → RST (Reset)

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 3: Scanning Networks

Topic: TCP Flag Scanning Methods

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“A NULL scan sends a TCP packet with all flags turned off. The system’s response (or lack thereof) allows the attacker to infer whether a port is open or closed, especially on UNIX-based systems.”

Incorrect Options:

B: Vague and inaccurate

C: Refers to Xmas scan (URG, PSH, FIN)

D/E: Irrelevant to TCP flags

Restrict results to those of a certain filetype. E.g., PDF, DOCX, TXT, PPT, etc. Note: The “ext:” operator can also be used—the results are identical.

Example: apple filetype:pdf / apple ext:pdf

Sending an email to a known non-existent user is a reconnaissance technique used to:

Analyze bounce-back (NDR) messages.

Discover the email server’s operating system, filtering behavior, internal mail routing, and directory structure.

Reveal technologies such as Exchange, Postfix, etc.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 2: Footprinting and Reconnaissance

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Sending a message to an invalid address can reveal error messages or NDRs that leak internal system details, such as mail server versions, spam filtering technologies, and internal naming conventions.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Not applicable.

B/C: Not the purpose here.

E: Anti-virus testing requires a separate controlled method.

One of the best ways to avoid being stopped by antivirus software is to encode our payload with msfencode. Msfencode is a useful tool that alters the code in an executable so that it looks different to antivirus software but will still run the same way. Much as the binary attachment in email is encoded in Base64, msfencode encodes the original executable in a new binary. Then, when the executable is run, msfencode decodes the original code into memory and exe-cutes it.

The recommended architecture for secure web application deployment is a multi-tiered setup:

Web server in the DMZ (public-facing)

Application server on the internal network

Database server on the internal network

This design limits the exposure of critical components. Only the web server is exposed to the internet, while application and database servers are shielded by firewalls and only accessible internally.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 10: Hacking Web Servers

Quote:

“Place the web server in the DMZ and keep the application and database servers within the internal network. This reduces the attack surface and provides layered security.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. Internal placement makes them inaccessible externally.

C & D. Exposing the database or all servers to the internet introduces significant risk.

===========

Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) enumeration involves querying devices on the network for information such as routing tables, interface statistics, and system details.

Useful tools include:

A. SNMPUtil: A command-line Microsoft utility for sending SNMP requests.

B. SNScan: Tool from Foundstone for SNMP scanning and enumeration.

C. SNMPScan: Lightweight tool for scanning networks for SNMP-enabled devices.

D. SolarWinds IP Network Browser: A commercial tool for graphical SNMP enumeration.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 4: Enumeration

Subsection: SNMP Enumeration Tools

Incorrect Option:

E. NMap can detect SNMP services, but is not specialized for SNMP enumeration like the others.

In CEH v13 Module 10 & 12: Vulnerability Analysis and Web Hacking, Netsparker is introduced as a leading automated web vulnerability scanner capable of detecting:

SQL Injection

Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

Local File Inclusion (LFI)

Misconfigured services

Authentication issues

It performs:

Crawling, attack simulation, and detailed reporting.

Ideal for automated assessment of web servers and applications.

Option Clarification:

A. Infoga: Email information gathering tool.

B. WebCopier Pro: Used for offline website downloading.

C. Netsparker: Purpose-built web vulnerability scanner.

D. NCollector Studio: Website archiving tool, not vulnerability-focused.

These tools are all Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack tools that coordinate large numbers of systems (bots) to flood target networks or services:

Trinoo – UDP flood-based DDoS tool

TFN2k (Tribe Flood Network 2000) – Supports ICMP, SYN, and other attack types

WinTrinoo – Windows variant of Trinoo

Stacheldraht – Combines features of Trinoo and TFN with encryption and auto-updating

T-Sight – DDoS control tool

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 9: Denial-of-Service Attacks

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“These tools are classic examples of distributed DoS platforms used by attackers to launch coordinated flood attacks using compromised hosts.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Not all tools were developed by the same group.

B: Not typically used by defenders.

D/E: These tools are cross-platform (some run on Linux, others on Windows).

A DHCP starvation assault is a pernicious computerized assault that objectives DHCP workers. During a DHCP assault, an unfriendly entertainer floods a DHCP worker with false DISCOVER bundles until the DHCP worker debilitates its stock of IP addresses. When that occurs, the aggressor can deny genuine organization clients administration, or even stock an other DHCP association that prompts a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) assault.

In a DHCP Starvation assault, a threatening entertainer sends a huge load of false DISCOVER parcels until the DHCP worker thinks they’ve used their accessible pool. Customers searching for IP tends to find that there are no IP addresses for them, and they’re refused assistance. Furthermore, they may search for an alternate DHCP worker, one which the unfriendly entertainer may give. What’s more, utilizing a threatening or sham IP address, that unfriendly entertainer would now be able to peruse all the traffic that customer sends and gets.

In an unfriendly climate, where we have a malevolent machine running some sort of an instrument like Yersinia, there could be a machine that sends DHCP DISCOVER bundles. This malevolent customer doesn’t send a modest bunch – it sends a great many vindictive DISCOVER bundles utilizing sham, made-up MAC addresses as the source MAC address for each solicitation.

In the event that the DHCP worker reacts to every one of these false DHCP DISCOVER parcels, the whole IP address pool could be exhausted, and that DHCP worker could trust it has no more IP delivers to bring to the table to legitimate DHCP demands.

When a DHCP worker has no more IP delivers to bring to the table, ordinarily the following thing to happen would be for the aggressor to get their own DHCP worker. This maverick DHCP worker at that point starts giving out IP addresses.

The advantage of that to the assailant is that if a false DHCP worker is distributing IP addresses, including default DNS and door data, customers who utilize those IP delivers and begin to utilize that default passage would now be able to be directed through the aggressor’s machine. That is all that an unfriendly entertainer requires to play out a man-in-the-center (MITM) assault.

User-directed spidering is a technique that allows the hacker to manually browse the target website and use a proxy or spider tool to capture and analyze the traffic. This way, the hacker can discover hidden or dynamic content that standard web spiders may miss due to a specific file in the root directory, such as robots.txt, that instructs them not to crawl certain pages or directories. User-directed spidering can also help the hacker to bypass authentication or authorization mechanisms, as well as identify vulnerabilities or sensitive information in the target website. User-directed spidering can be performed with tools like Burp Suite and WebScarab, which are web application security testing tools that can intercept, modify, and replay HTTP requests and responses, as well as perform various attacks and scans on the target website.

The other options are not likely to achieve the same results as user-directed spidering. Using Photon to retrieve archived URLs of the target website from archive.org may provide some historical information about the website, but it may not reflect the current state or content of the website. Using the Netcraft tool to gather website information may provide some general information about the website, such as its IP address, domain name, server software, or hosting provider, but it may not reveal the specific files or web pages on the website. Examining HTML source code and cookies may provide some clues about the website’s structure, functionality, or user preferences, but it may not expose the hidden or dynamic content that user-directed spidering can discover. References:

User Directed Spidering with Burp

Web Spidering - What Are Web Crawlers & How to Control Them

Web Security: Recon

Mapping the Application for Penetrating Web Applications — 1

The host discovery technique that the tester should use is TCP SYN Ping Scan. This technique sends a TCP SYN packet to a specified port on the target host and waits for a response. If the host responds with a TCP SYN/ACK packet, it means the host is alive and the port is open. If the host responds with a TCP RST packet, it means the host is alive but the port is closed. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead or filtered by a firewall12. TCP SYN Ping Scan can bypass firewall restrictions because it mimics the initial stage of a TCP three-way handshake, which is a common and legitimate network activity. Therefore, most firewalls will allow TCP SYN packets to pass through and reach the target host, unless they are configured to block specific ports or IP addresses3. TCP SYN Ping Scan can also accurately identify live systems because it does not rely on ICMP, which may be blocked or rate-limited by some firewalls or routers.

The other options are not as effective or feasible as TCP SYN Ping Scan for the following reasons:

A. UDP Ping Scan: This technique sends a UDP packet to a specified port on the target host and waits for a response. If the host responds with an ICMP Port Unreachable message, it means the host is alive but the port is closed. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead, the port is open, or the packet is filtered by a firewall12. UDP Ping Scan may not bypass firewall restrictions because some firewalls may block or drop UDP packets, especially if they are sent to uncommon or reserved ports. UDP Ping Scan may also not accurately identify live systems because it cannot distinguish between open ports and filtered packets, and it may generate false positives or negatives due to packet loss or rate-limiting.

B. ICMP ECHO Ping Scan: This technique sends an ICMP ECHO Request packet to the target host and waits for an ICMP ECHO Reply packet. If the host responds with an ICMP ECHO Reply packet, it means the host is alive. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead or filtered by a firewall12. ICMP ECHO Ping Scan may not bypass firewall restrictions because some firewalls may block or drop ICMP packets, especially if they are sent to prevent ping sweeps or denial-of-service attacks. ICMP ECHO Ping Scan may also not accurately identify live systems because it may generate false positives or negatives due to packet loss or rate-limiting.

C. ICMP Timestamp Ping Scan: This technique sends an ICMP Timestamp Request packet to the target host and waits for an ICMP Timestamp Reply packet. If the host responds with an ICMP Timestamp Reply packet, it means the host is alive. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead or filtered by a firewall12. ICMP Timestamp Ping Scan may not bypass firewall restrictions because some firewalls may block or drop ICMP packets, especially if they are sent to prevent ping sweeps or denial-of-service attacks. ICMP Timestamp Ping Scan may also not accurately identify live systems because it may generate false positives or negatives due to packet loss or rate-limiting.

The php.ini file may be a special file for PHP. it’s where you declare changes to your PHP settings. The server is already configured with standard settings for PHP, which your site will use by default. Unless you would like to vary one or more settings, there’s no got to create or modify a php.ini file. If you’d wish to make any changes to settings, please do so through the MultiPHP INI Editor.

The VRFY commands enables SMTP clients to send an invitation to an SMTP server to verify that mail for a selected user name resides on the server. The VRFY command is defined in RFC 821.

The server sends a response indicating whether the user is local or not, whether mail are going to be forwarded, and so on. A response of 250 indicates that the user name is local; a response of 251 indicates that the user name isn’t local, but the server can forward the message. The server response includes the mailbox name.

WS-Security (Web Services Security) is a protocol specification that provides a means for securing SOAP-based messages. It defines how to add authentication, encryption, and digital signatures to SOAP headers, helping ensure message integrity and confidentiality.

According to CEH v13 Official Courseware:

WS-Security is an extension of SOAP.

It supports features such as:

Authentication via tokens (e.g., username, X.509)

Message integrity via digital signatures

Message confidentiality via XML encryption

Incorrect Options:

A. WSDL (Web Services Description Language) describes the web service interface but does not provide security.

B. WS Work Processes is not a defined web service security standard.

C. WS-Policy allows expressing security requirements, but enforcement is handled by WS-Security.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: "Web Services Security"

Subsection: "WS-* Standards"

===========

A covert channel is a communication method used to transfer information in a way that violates security policy, often by repurposing legitimate protocols or functions for unauthorized communication.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats

Topic: Covert Communication and Data Exfiltration Techniques

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“A covert channel exploits unintended uses of legitimate communication protocols. It allows data to be transmitted without detection by hiding the communication inside seemingly benign traffic.”

Incorrect Options:

A: A non-standard port may aid in hiding services, but doesn’t constitute a covert channel.

C: Multiplexing is a normal communication mechanism.

D: WEP is insecure, but this isn’t related to covert channels.

WHOIS is an Internet service that allows users to query domain name registries to retrieve information about registered domain names. It includes data such as:

Registrant’s name and contact information

Domain creation and expiration dates

Registrar details and name servers

WHOIS is often used during the reconnaissance phase in penetration testing.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 2: Footprinting and Reconnaissance

Quote:

“WHOIS databases provide public domain registration details including contact names, email addresses, and registrar information. This is useful for initial reconnaissance.”

Incorrect Options:

B. CAPTCHA is used to distinguish human users from bots.

C. IANA oversees global IP address allocation and DNS root zone management.

D. IETF is responsible for internet standards, not registrant databases.

===========

A Stealth or Tunneling Virus is designed specifically to evade detection by antivirus software and system monitoring tools. These viruses work by intercepting and modifying the operating system’s service call interrupts (such as INT 13h and INT 21h in DOS systems), which are used to access files or system services.

By hooking into these interrupts, the virus can return clean or forged data to antivirus scanners, thus hiding its malicious presence from detection tools.

Tunneling viruses may also operate at a lower level to evade even more advanced antivirus detection methods, making them particularly dangerous and hard to detect.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 6: Malware Threats

Section: Types of Viruses

Quote:

“Tunneling viruses attempt to avoid detection by antivirus programs by installing themselves in the interrupt handler chain. These viruses intercept operating system calls to conceal their activities.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. Macro viruses target applications like Microsoft Word/Excel and use embedded macros, but do not alter service call interrupts.

C. Cavity viruses insert code into empty spaces in files without changing the file size but do not modify interrupts.

D. Polymorphic viruses mutate their code to avoid signature-based detection but do not typically interfere with system interrupts directly.

-sA (TCP ACK scan)

This scan is different than the others discussed so far in that it never determines open (or even open|filtered) ports. It is used to map out firewall rulesets, determining whether they are stateful or not and which ports are filtered.

The ACK scan probe packet has only the ACK flag set (unless you use --scanflags). When scanning unfiltered systems, open and closed ports will both return a RST packet. Nmap then labels them as unfiltered, meaning that they are reachable by the ACK packet, but whether they are open or closed is undetermined. Ports that don't respond, or send certain ICMP error messages back (type 3, code 0, 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, or 13), are labeled filtered.

In CEH v13 Module 01: Information Security Controls, the Remote Access Policy is defined as the guideline that governs:

Which remote access methods (VPNs, modems, RDP, etc.) are permitted.

Requirements for authentication and encryption.

Who is authorized to use them and under what conditions.

In This Case:

The use of a dial-out modem is considered a remote access method, especially if it bypasses the corporate firewall.

The analyst needs to check whether such remote access is permitted, and under what security controls.

Passive OS fingerprinting involves observing traffic from a remote host and analyzing it to infer details about the operating system without actively sending packets or probes. This is useful in stealthy reconnaissance where avoiding detection is critical.

tcpdump is a packet analyzer that captures traffic in real time. By analyzing certain TCP/IP header fields such as TTL (Time-To-Live), window size, TCP options, and DF (Don't Fragment) flags, attackers can passively deduce the operating system of the target host.

CEH v13 Guide states:

“Passive fingerprinting tools like tcpdump and Wireshark allow the attacker to capture packets and analyze them for OS-specific traits, making it possible to identify the OS without sending packets to the target system.”

Reference – CEH v13 Study Guide:

Module 02: Footprinting and Reconnaissance, Section: “OS Fingerprinting Techniques”, Subsection: “Passive OS Fingerprinting”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A: nmap is primarily an active scanning tool (though it has limited passive capabilities).

C: tracert is used for tracing packet routes, not OS fingerprinting.

D: ping checks host availability and latency, not OS details.

‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒

According to CEH v13 Module 06: Malware Threats, when analyzing suspicious system behavior or investigating a suspected Trojan infection, a common and effective approach is to:

Monitor system activity and network behavior using tools like netstat, Wireshark, and TCPView.

Trojans often create covert channels or backdoors for remote access, which can be identified through unexpected or unauthorized outgoing connections to remote IP addresses or domains.

Using netstat -an or netstat -ano helps identify open ports and active connections, and checking these against known IPs can indicate whether a Trojan is communicating with a Command and Control (C&C) server.

Analysis of Each Option:

A. Use ExifTool and check for malicious content

Incorrect. ExifTool is primarily used for extracting metadata from files, especially images and documents. It is not effective for analyzing executable malware or system behavior post-execution.

B. You do not check; rather, you immediately restore a previous snapshot of the operating system

Incorrect. While restoring from a snapshot might eventually be required, immediate restoration without diagnosis is not a recommended or forensically sound first step. It also prevents root cause analysis.

C. Upload the file to VirusTotal

Partially correct but not sufficient. While uploading the file to VirusTotal is a good step to confirm if the file is known malware, it does not identify whether the machine is currently infected or actively compromised.

D. Use netstat and check for outgoing connections to strange IP addresses or domains

Correct. This method helps detect if the system is making suspicious external connections that are common in Trojan infections.

Reference from CEH v13 Study Guide and Course Materials:

CEH v13 Official Module 06 – Malware Threats, Section: Types of Malware – Trojans, and System Monitoring Tools

CEH v13 eCourseware Lab Manual: "Detecting Trojan Activity using netstat and TCPView"

CEH Engage Range: Malware Investigation Phase – Trojan Behavior Detection

Gathering Information using Reverse Image Search Reverse image search helps an attacker in tracking the original source and details of images, such as photographs, profile pictures, and memes Attackers can use online tools such as Google Image Search, TinEye Reverse Image Search, and Yahoo Image Search to perform reverse

In authentication, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) involves using more than one category of authentication factors:

Something you know (e.g., password)

Something you have (e.g., RFID badge, token)

Something you are (e.g., biometrics like fingerprints, facial recognition, gait)

In this scenario:

The RFID badge is "something you have" (a physical object).

The gait recognition (walking pattern) captured by the camera is a biometric—"something you are" (a physical characteristic).

Together, these two methods represent two distinct authentication factors, thereby implementing true multi-factor authentication.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 5: System Hacking

Topic: Authentication Mechanisms

Quote:

“Examples of multi-factor authentication include combining biometrics (something you are) with a smart card or badge (something you have). Gait recognition is considered a behavioral biometric and falls under ‘something you are’.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. Incorrect — gait and RFID represent two separate factor types, not one.

C. No evidence in the scenario supports high false positives.

D. Gait analysis is a recognized biometric method and can be used for identification.

The base metric represents the inherent qualities of a vulnerability, according to the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). CVSS is a framework that numerically characterizes the severity of software vulnerabilities between the range of 0-10. CVSS consists of three metric groups: Base, Temporal, and Environmental. The base metric group captures the characteristics of a vulnerability that are constant over time and across user environments. The base metric group consists of six sub-metrics: Attack Vector, Attack Complexity, Privileges Required, User Interaction, Scope, and Impact. The impact sub-metric further consists of three sub-metrics: Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. The base metric group produces a score ranging from 0 to 10, which reflects the intrinsic and fundamental properties of a vulnerability12.

The other options are not correct for the following reasons:

A. Temporal metric represents the inherent qualities of a vulnerability: This option is incorrect because the temporal metric group captures the characteristics of a vulnerability that change over time due to events external to the vulnerability. The temporal metric group consists of three sub-metrics: Exploit Code Maturity, Remediation Level, and Report Confidence. The temporal metric group modifies the base score to reflect the current state of the vulnerability, such as the availability of exploit code, the existence of patches or workarounds, and the degree of verification of the vulnerability report12.

C. Environmental metric involves the features that change during the lifetime of the vulnerability: This option is incorrect because the environmental metric group captures the characteristics of a vulnerability that are relevant and unique to a user’s environment. The environmental metric group consists of three sub-metrics: Modified Attack Vector, Modified Attack Complexity, and Modified Privileges Required. The environmental metric group also allows the user to assign importance values to the impact sub-metrics: Confidentiality Requirement, Integrity Requirement, and Availability Requirement. The environmental metric group modifies the base and temporal scores to reflect the impact of the vulnerability on the user’s specific environment, such as the network configuration, the security objectives, and the asset value12.

D. Temporal metric involves measuring vulnerabilities based on a specific environment or implementation: This option is incorrect because the temporal metric group does not involve measuring vulnerabilities based on a specific environment or implementation, but rather on the factors that change over time due to events external to the vulnerability. The environmental metric group, not the temporal metric group, involves measuring vulnerabilities based on a specific environment or implementation, as explained in option C.

DNS poisoning (also known as DNS cache poisoning) occurs when a malicious actor injects false DNS data into a DNS resolver's cache. The poisoned entry will persist for the duration of its TTL (Time To Live), which is defined in the DNS SOA (Start of Authority) record.

The SOA record contains several fields including:

Serial number

Refresh

Retry

Expire

Minimum TTL

The Minimum TTL value in the SOA record determines how long a DNS resolver should cache the DNS data — including any potentially poisoned data.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 3: Scanning Networks

Topic: DNS Enumeration & Poisoning

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“The SOA record includes a minimum TTL value that dictates how long DNS information should be cached by other DNS servers. If DNS cache poisoning occurs, the false information will persist until the TTL expires.”

Incorrect Options:

A: MX (Mail Exchange) defines mail servers, not TTLs.

C: NS (Name Server) specifies authoritative servers, not caching durations.

D: TIMEOUT is not a valid DNS resource record.

SYN/FIN scanning using IP fragments is a process of scanning that was developed to avoid false positives generated by other scans because of a packet filtering device on the target system. The TCP header splits into several packets to evade the packet filter. For any transmission, every TCP header must have the source and destination port for the initial packet (8-octet, 64-bit). The initialized flags in the next packet allow the remote host to reassemble the packets upon receipt via an Internet protocol module that detects the fragmented data packets using field-equivalent values of the source, destination, protocol, and identification.

Adversaries could decide to build an possible or file difficult to find or analyze by encrypting, encoding, or otherwise obfuscating its contents on the system or in transit. this is often common behavior which will be used across totally different platforms and therefore the network to evade defenses.

Payloads may be compressed, archived, or encrypted so as to avoid detection. These payloads may be used throughout Initial Access or later to mitigate detection. typically a user’s action could also be needed to open and Deobfuscate/Decode Files or info for User Execution. The user can also be needed to input a parole to open a parole protected compressed/encrypted file that was provided by the mortal. Adversaries can also used compressed or archived scripts, like JavaScript.

Portions of files can even be encoded to cover the plain-text strings that will otherwise facilitate defenders with discovery. Payloads can also be split into separate, ostensibly benign files that solely reveal malicious practicality once reassembled.

Adversaries can also modify commands dead from payloads or directly via a Command and Scripting Interpreter. surroundings variables, aliases, characters, and different platform/language specific linguistics may be wont to evade signature based mostly detections and application management mechanisms.

Windows TTL 128, Linux TTL 64, OpenBSD 255 ...

Time to Live (TTL) represents to number of 'hops' a packet can take before it is considered invalid. For Windows/Windows Phone, this value is 128. This value is 64 for Linux/Android.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From CEH v13 Guide:

Vulnerability identification is the step in the risk assessment process where security flaws or weaknesses are identified in existing systems, policies, or procedures.

CEH v13 Reference:

Module 5: Vulnerability Assessment – Risk Assessment Concepts

“Vulnerability identification is the process of discovering existing flaws and weaknesses in systems or processes that may be exploited.”

=============================================================

A Kerberoasting attack is a technique that exploits the weak encryption of Kerberos service tickets to obtain the password hashes of service accounts that have a Service Principal Name (SPN) associated with them. The attacker can then crack the hashes offline and use the plaintext passwords to impersonate the service accounts and access network resources.

A Kerberoasting attack follows these steps1:

The attacker impersonates a legitimate Active Directory user and authenticates to the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in the Active Directory environment. They then request a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) from the KDC to access network resources. The KDC complies because the attacker is impersonating a legitimate user.

The attacker enumerates the service accounts that have an SPN using tools like GetUserSPNs.py or PowerView. They then request a service ticket for each SPN from the KDC using their TGT. The KDC grants the service tickets, which are encrypted with the password hashes of the service accounts.

The attacker captures the service tickets and takes them offline. They then attempt to crack the password hashes using tools like Hashcat or John the Ripper. They can use various methods, such as brute force, dictionary, or hybrid attacks, to guess the passwords. Alternatively, they can use a PRINCE attack, which is a probabilistic password generation technique that combines common words, patterns, and transformations to generate likely passwords2.

Once the attacker obtains the plaintext passwords of the service accounts, they can use them to authenticate as the service accounts and access the network resources that they are authorized to.

Therefore, the next step that the analyst should take after obtaining a valid TGT is to request a service ticket for the SPN of the target service account. This will allow them to capture the service ticket and extract the password hash of the service account.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In TCP session hijacking or spoofing:

An attacker sends a spoofed packet with the ACK bit set and a guessed (or predicted) sequence number to fool the receiver into thinking it's a legitimate continuation of an existing session.

Fred is simulating this by sending a TCP packet with the ACK bit and using his own IP as the source, trying to trick the switch into believing it's part of an already established session.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 11: Session Hijacking

Sniffing attacks are a type of network attack that involves intercepting and analyzing data packets as they travel over a network. Sniffing attacks can be used to steal sensitive information, such as usernames, passwords, credit card numbers, etc. Sniffing attacks can also be used to perform reconnaissance, spoofing, or man-in-the-middle attacks.

The IT department of the company has implemented some security measures to prevent or mitigate sniffing attacks, such as:

Adding the MAC address of the gateway to the ARP cache: This prevents ARP spoofing, which is a technique that allows an attacker to redirect network traffic to their own device by sending fake ARP messages that associate their MAC address with the IP address of the gateway.

Switching to IPv6 instead of IPv4: This reduces the risk of IP spoofing, which is a technique that allows an attacker to send packets with a forged source IP address, pretending to be another device on the network.

Using encrypted sessions such as SSH instead of Telnet, and Secure File Transfer Protocol instead of FTP: This protects the data from being read or modified by an attacker who can capture the packets, as the data is encrypted and authenticated using cryptographic protocols.

However, these measures are not enough to completely eliminate the threat of sniffing, as an attacker can still use other techniques, such as:

Passive sniffing: This involves monitoring the network traffic without injecting any packets or altering the data. Passive sniffing can be done on a shared network, such as a hub, or on a switched network, using techniques such as MAC flooding, port mirroring, or VLAN hopping.

Active sniffing: This involves injecting packets or modifying the data to manipulate the network behavior or gain access to more traffic. Active sniffing can be done using techniques such as DHCP spoofing, DNS poisoning, ICMP redirection, or TCP session hijacking.

Therefore, the next step to enhance network security is to implement network scanning and monitoring tools, which can help detect and prevent sniffing attacks by:

Scanning the network for unauthorized devices, such as rogue access points, hubs, or sniffers, and removing them or isolating them from the network.

Monitoring the network for abnormal traffic patterns, such as excessive ARP requests, DNS queries, ICMP messages, or TCP connections, and alerting the network administrators or blocking the suspicious sources.

Analyzing the network traffic for malicious content, such as malware, phishing, or exfiltration, and filtering or quarantining the infected or compromised devices.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

IDS cannot easily detect malicious content in encrypted traffic. Since the payload is encrypted (e.g., HTTPS, SSL/TLS), it is unreadable without decryption.

Statement B is therefore FALSE.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 13: IDS, Firewalls and Honeypots → Limitations of IDS

Developed by Robert “RSnake” Hansen, Slowloris is DDoS attack software that permits one computer to require down an internet server. Due the straightforward yet elegant nature of this attack, it requires minimal bandwidth to implement and affects the target server’s web server only, with almost no side effects on other services and ports.

Slowloris has proven highly-effective against many popular sorts of web server software, including Apache 1.x and 2.x.

Over the years, Slowloris has been credited with variety of high-profile server takedowns. Notably, it had been used extensively by Iranian ‘hackivists’ following the 2009 Iranian presidential election to attack Iranian government internet sites .

Slowloris works by opening multiple connections to the targeted web server and keeping them open as long as possible. It does this by continuously sending partial HTTP requests, none of which are ever completed. The attacked servers open more and connections open, expecting each of the attack requests to be completed.

Periodically, the Slowloris sends subsequent HTTP headers for every request, but never actually completes the request. Ultimately, the targeted server’s maximum concurrent connection pool is filled, and extra (legitimate) connection attempts are denied.

By sending partial, as against malformed, packets, Slowloris can easily elapse traditional Intrusion Detection systems.

Named after a kind of slow-moving Asian primate, Slowloris really does win the race by moving slowly and steadily. A Slowloris attack must await sockets to be released by legitimate requests before consuming them one by one.

For a high-volume internet site , this will take a while . the method are often further slowed if legitimate sessions are reinitiated. But within the end, if the attack is unmitigated, Slowloris—like the tortoise—wins the race.

If undetected or unmitigated, Slowloris attacks also can last for long periods of your time . When attacked sockets outing , Slowloris simply reinitiates the connections, continuing to reach the online server until mitigated.

Designed for stealth also as efficacy, Slowloris are often modified to send different host headers within the event that a virtual host is targeted, and logs are stored separately for every virtual host.

More importantly, within the course of an attack, Slowloris are often set to suppress log file creation. this suggests the attack can catch unmonitored servers off-guard, with none red flags appearing in log file entries.

Methods of mitigation

Imperva’s security services are enabled by reverse proxy technology, used for inspection of all incoming requests on their thanks to the clients’ servers.

Imperva’s secured proxy won’t forward any partial connection requests—rendering all Slowloris DDoS attack attempts completely and utterly useless.

 DHCP.MIB: Monitors network traffic between DHCP servers and remote hosts

■ HOSTMIB.MIB: Monitors and manages host resources

■ LNMIB2.MIB: Contains object types for workstation and server services

■ MIBJI.MIB: Manages TCP/IP-based Internet using a simple architecture and system

■ WINS.MIB: For the Windows Internet Name Service (WINS)

The hacker’s next step to confirm the XSS vulnerability would be to utilize a script hosted on the application’s domain to test the form. This is because the application’s CSP allows scripts from its own domain, but not from inline or external sources. Therefore, the hacker can try to inject a payload that references a script file on the same domain as the application, such as:

<script src="/path/to/script.js"></script>

where script.js contains some benign code, such as alert('XSS') or print('XSS'). If the script executes in the browser, then the hacker has confirmed the XSS vulnerability. Otherwise, the CSP has blocked the script and prevented the XSS attack.

The other options are not feasible or effective for the following reasons:

A. Try to disable the CSP to bypass script restrictions: This option is not feasible because the hacker cannot disable the CSP on the server side, and the browser enforces the CSP on the client side. The hacker would need to modify the browser settings or use a browser extension to disable the CSP, but this would not affect the victim’s browser or the application’s security.

B. Inject a benign script inline to the form to see if it executes: This option is not effective because the application’s CSP disallows inline scripts, meaning scripts that are embedded in the HTML code. Therefore, the hacker would not be able to inject a script tag or an event handler attribute that contains some code, such as:

<script>alert('XSS')</script> or 

The CSP would block these scripts and prevent the XSS attack.

D. Load a script from an external domain to test the vulnerability: This option is not effective because the application’s CSP disallows scripts from external domains, meaning scripts that are loaded from a different domain than the application. Therefore, the hacker would not be able to inject a script tag that references a script file on another domain, such as:

<script src=" "></script>

The CSP would block these scripts and prevent the XSS attack.

A Kernel-level rootkit operates at the core of the operating system (OS kernel), enabling the attacker to:

Modify or replace kernel code

Load malicious kernel modules

Hide files, processes, and backdoors at a level that is difficult for standard security tools to detect

According to CEH v13:

Kernel-mode rootkits are highly stealthy and dangerous because they run with the highest privileges.

These rootkits modify system calls and memory structures in the kernel space to conceal malicious activity.

Incorrect Options:

A. User-mode rootkits operate at the application layer and are less stealthy than kernel-level rootkits.

B. Library-level rootkits manipulate standard libraries (like libc) to intercept calls.

D. Hypervisor-level rootkits run beneath the OS (e.g., via virtualization) and are extremely rare and complex.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 06: Malware Threats

Section: “Types of Rootkits”

Subsection: “Kernel-Mode Rootkits vs. User-Mode Rootkits”

A digital signature is a mathematical technique used to validate the authenticity and integrity of a message, software, or digital document. It's the digital equivalent of a handwritten signature or stamped seal, but it offers far more inherent security. A digital signature is intended to solve the problem of tampering and impersonation in digital communications.

Digital signatures can provide evidence of origin, identity, and status of electronic documents, transactions, or digital messages. Signers can also use them to acknowledge informed consent.

Digital signatures are based on public-key cryptography, also known as asymmetric cryptography. Two keys are generated using a public key algorithm, such as RSA (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman), creating a mathematically linked pair of keys, one private and one public.

Digital signatures work through public-key cryptography's two mutually authenticating cryptographic keys. The individual who creates the digital signature uses a private key to encrypt signature-related data, while the only way to decrypt that data is with the signer's public key.

Bob wants Alice to verify that the message hasn’t been tampered with. This is a use case for ensuring data integrity and authenticity. The process described matches the creation of a digital signature:

Bob computes a checksum (typically a cryptographic hash) of the message.

Then, he encrypts this checksum (hash) using his own private key.

Alice receives the message and decrypts the checksum using Bob’s public key.

If the decrypted checksum matches the hash she computes from the received message, she confirms the message’s integrity and authenticity.

This is a fundamental principle of digital signatures.

Incorrect Options:

A. Alice's private key is never used by others; it's confidential.

B. Encrypting with Alice’s public key ensures confidentiality, not authenticity.

D. Bob’s public key is used by the receiver to verify authenticity, not for encryption in this context.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 20: Cryptography

Section: “Digital Signatures”

Subsection: “Using Private Keys to Sign and Public Keys to Verify”

CEH Engage Lab: Email Signing and Verification

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

A TCP SYN flood is a type of Denial of Service (DoS) attack. The attacker sends a barrage of SYN packets with spoofed (random or unreachable) source IP addresses. The victim server replies with SYN/ACK, but the final ACK never arrives.

This results in:

The victim keeping the half-open connections in the queue.

The queue filling up, leading to new, legitimate requests being dropped.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 9: Denial-of-Service Attacks → TCP SYN Flood

When a switch's ARP cache is flooded using a tool like Macof (from the Dsniff suite), it overwhelms the device's MAC address table, which stores port-to-MAC mappings.

If the table overflows:

The switch can no longer associate MAC addresses with specific ports.

It fails open and begins forwarding frames out all ports — just like a hub.

This degrades the switch’s functionality and allows attackers to sniff traffic on segments that should otherwise be isolated.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing → Switch-based Attacks

In a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, an attacker intercepts communication between two parties and can read, alter, or inject data without either party knowing. Susan's actions — intercepting and modifying her boss's session data before relaying it to the server — is the classic MITM pattern.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing

Module 11: Session Hijacking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“In a MITM attack, the attacker positions themselves between two communicating parties, relaying and possibly altering communications while maintaining the illusion that the parties are communicating directly.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Sniffing only involves passive listening.

B: Spoofing may involve impersonation but not necessarily interception and relay.

D: DoS is about service disruption, not data interception.

Split DNS (also known as Split-Horizon DNS) is a configuration where internal users and external users receive different DNS responses. Typically, one DNS server resides in the DMZ for public access, and another is inside the network for internal name resolution.

???? Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide, Module 9: System Hacking / Perimeter Security

“Split DNS allows different DNS records to be presented based on whether the requester is from inside or outside the organization’s network.”

❌ Incorrect options:

A. DynDNS is a dynamic DNS provider.

B. DNS Scheme is a non-standard term.

C. DNSSEC is a security extension for DNS, not a deployment model.

Appropriately controlling admittance to web content is significant for running a safe web worker. Index crossing or Path Traversal is a HTTP assault which permits aggressors to get to limited catalogs and execute orders outside of the web worker’s root registry.

Web workers give two primary degrees of security instruments

Access Control Lists (ACLs)

Root index

An Access Control List is utilized in the approval cycle. It is a rundown which the web worker’s manager uses to show which clients or gatherings can get to, change or execute specific records on the worker, just as other access rights.

The root registry is a particular index on the worker record framework in which the clients are kept. Clients can’t get to anything over this root.

For instance: the default root registry of IIS on Windows is C:\Inetpub\wwwroot and with this arrangement, a client doesn’t approach C:\Windows yet approaches C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\news and some other indexes and documents under the root catalog (given that the client is confirmed by means of the ACLs).

The root index keeps clients from getting to any documents on the worker, for example, C:\WINDOWS/system32/win.ini on Windows stages and the/and so on/passwd record on Linux/UNIX stages.

This weakness can exist either in the web worker programming itself or in the web application code.

To play out a registry crossing assault, all an assailant requires is an internet browser and some information on where to aimlessly discover any default documents and registries on the framework.

What an assailant can do if your site is defenseless

With a framework defenseless against index crossing, an aggressor can utilize this weakness to venture out of the root catalog and access different pieces of the record framework. This may enable the assailant to see confined documents, which could give the aggressor more data needed to additional trade off the framework.

Contingent upon how the site access is set up, the aggressor will execute orders by mimicking himself as the client which is related with “the site”. Along these lines everything relies upon what the site client has been offered admittance to in the framework.

Illustration of a Directory Traversal assault by means of web application code

In web applications with dynamic pages, input is generally gotten from programs through GET or POST solicitation techniques. Here is an illustration of a HTTP GET demand URL

GET HTTP/1.1

Host: test.webarticles.com

With this URL, the browser requests the dynamic page show.asp from the server and with it also sends the parameter view with the value of oldarchive.html. When this request is executed on the web server, show.asp retrieves the file oldarchive.html from the server’s file system, renders it and then sends it back to the browser which displays it to the user. The attacker would assume that show.asp can retrieve files from the file system and sends the following custom URL.

GET HTTP/1.1

Host: test.webarticles.com

This will cause the dynamic page to retrieve the file system.ini from the file system and display it to the user. The expression ../ instructs the system to go one directory up which is commonly used as an operating system directive. The attacker has to guess how many directories he has to go up to find the Windows folder on the system, but this is easily done by trial and error.

Example of a Directory Traversal attack via web server

Apart from vulnerabilities in the code, even the web server itself can be open to directory traversal attacks. The problem can either be incorporated into the web server software or inside some sample script files left available on the server.

The vulnerability has been fixed in the latest versions of web server software, but there are web servers online which are still using older versions of IIS and Apache which might be open to directory traversal attacks. Even though you might be using a web server software version that has fixed this vulnerability, you might still have some sensitive default script directories exposed which are well known to hackers.

For example, a URL request which makes use of the scripts directory of IIS to traverse directories and execute a command can be

GET HTTP/1.1

Host: server.com

The request would return to the user a list of all files in the C:\ directory by executing the cmd.exe command shell file and run the command dir c:\ in the shell. The %5c expression that is in the URL request is a web server escape code which is used to represent normal characters. In this case %5c represents the character \.

Newer versions of modern web server software check for these escape codes and do not let them through. Some older versions however, do not filter out these codes in the root directory enforcer and will let the attackers execute such commands.

In CEH v13 Module 17: Mobile and IoT Security, Spearphone is defined as a privacy-intrusion attack that:

Exploits a smartphone’s speaker output, particularly when loudspeaker mode is used.

Leverages motion sensors (accelerometer, gyroscope) through a malicious app to capture acoustic signals emitted during:

Phone calls

Voice assistant interactions

Media playback

This enables attackers to extract private speech content without needing microphone access.

Option Clarification:

A. Man-in-the-disk: Exploits unprotected external storage in Android.

B. aLTEr: Exploits LTE protocol weaknesses; unrelated to loudspeaker eavesdropping.

C. SIM card attack: Targets SIM-level vulnerabilities (e.g., SIMjacker).

D. Spearphone: Correct — exploits loudspeaker emissions and motion sensors.

Regional Internet Registries (RIRs):

ARIN (American Registry for Internet Numbers)

AFRINIC (African Network Information Center)

APNIC (Asia Pacific Network Information Center)

RIPE (Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre)

LACNIC (Latin American and Caribbean Network Information Center)

This falls under Requirement 8 of PCI DSS: "Identify and authenticate access to system components," which supports the objective of implementing strong access control measures.

CEH v13 Reference:

Module 20: Hacking Mobile Platforms and IoT – Compliance Standards

"PCI DSS requires unique identification for each person with access to ensure accountability and access control."

In an SOA (Start of Authority) record, the fifth value represents the “Expire” interval — the time a secondary DNS server will keep trying to contact the primary server before considering the zone data stale or invalid.

SOA Format:

SOA Primary-NS Hostmaster (Serial Refresh Retry Expire Minimum-TTL)

Given SOA:

(200302028 3600 3600 604800 3600)

Serial: 200302028

Refresh: 3600 seconds

Retry: 3600 seconds

Expire: 604800 seconds = 7 days = 1 week

Minimum TTL: 3600

So, if the secondary DNS cannot contact the primary for 604800 seconds (1 week), it will stop serving that zone’s data.

Wireless Threats - Confidentiality Attacks Launch of Wireless Attacks: Evil Twin Evil Twin is a wireless AP that pretends to be a legitimate AP by replicating another network name. Attackers set up a rogue AP outside the corporate perimeter and lures users to sign into the wrong AP. (P.2297/2281)

Verbose failure messages are detailed error messages that reveal too much information about authentication failures. In the described scenario, the web application specifies whether the username or password is incorrect. This behavior enables attackers to:

Enumerate valid usernames by submitting random inputs and observing which error message is returned.

Use the valid usernames to conduct targeted attacks such as brute-force attempts or social engineering.

According to CEH v13:

Authentication mechanisms should provide generic error messages such as “Invalid username or password” to avoid exposing system behavior.

Verbose error messages violate the principle of "fail securely."

Incorrect Options:

A. Insecure transmission relates to credentials being sent over unencrypted channels (e.g., HTTP instead of HTTPS).

C. User impersonation involves taking on the identity of another user, not enumeration.

D. Password reset mechanisms are a different component of authentication, not mentioned in this context.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: “Authentication Bypass Techniques”

Subsection: “Enumeration via Verbose Error Messages”

===========

ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) spoofing/poisoning is a common attack in which an attacker sends falsified ARP messages to associate their MAC address with the IP address of another host. To defend against ARP spoofing:

A. Port Security: Limits the number of MAC addresses per port; prevents MAC flooding and spoofing.

B. ARPwatch: Monitors ARP traffic and alerts on unusual changes.

D. Static ARP Entries: Prevent ARP responses from overwriting MAC-IP mappings, effective in small networks.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing

Module 11: Session Hijacking

Module 20: Network Security

Incorrect Options:

C: Firewalls operate at Layer 3+; ARP is a Layer 2 protocol, so firewalls don’t prevent ARP spoofing.

E: Static IP addresses do not prevent ARP poisoning.

Firewalls primarily operate at Layer 3 (Network) and Layer 4 (Transport) of the OSI model. They inspect:

IP headers (Layer 3)

TCP/UDP port numbers (Layer 4)

Application-specific data in Layer 7-aware firewalls (for application filtering)

By examining transport layer port numbers and application layer headers, firewalls can block or allow traffic based on services like HTTP (port 80), FTP (port 21), and others.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 13: Evading IDS, Firewalls, and Honeypots

Quote:

“Firewalls filter traffic based on IP addresses, transport-layer port numbers, and application protocol headers to control access to services and applications.”

Incorrect Options:

B & C. Presentation and session layers are not relevant to firewall rule inspection.

D. Application layer doesn’t have port numbers; they are part of the transport layer.

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Social engineering is a psychological manipulation technique used by attackers to trick individuals into divulging confidential or personal information that may be used for fraudulent purposes.

It relies on human interaction and may involve tactics such as:

Impersonation

Pretexting

Phishing

Baiting

Rather than attacking systems directly, attackers exploit human trust and error.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 7: Social Engineering

In CEH v13 Module 12: Hacking Web Applications, the N-tier architecture is explained as a model used in web applications, typically with:

Presentation tier – User interface (UI) that interacts with the user.

Logic tier (also known as application or business logic layer) – Processes commands, makes logical decisions, and handles data movement and processing between the UI and the database.

Data tier – Manages database access and data storage.

So, the Logic tier is responsible for:

Handling the business rules.

Processing user inputs.

Accessing and manipulating data from the database.

Out-of-band SQL injection occurs when an attacker is unable to use an equivalent channel to launch the attack and gather results. … Out-of-band SQLi techniques would believe the database server’s ability to form DNS or HTTP requests to deliver data to an attacker. Out-of-band SQL injection is not very common, mostly because it depends on features being enabled on the database server being used by the web application. Out-of-band SQL injection occurs when an attacker is unable to use the same channel to launch the attack and gather results.

Out-of-band techniques, offer an attacker an alternative to inferential time-based techniques, especially if the server responses are not very stable (making an inferential time-based attack unreliable).

Out-of-band SQLi techniques would rely on the database server’s ability to make DNS or HTTP requests to deliver data to an attacker. Such is the case with Microsoft SQL Server’s xp_dirtree command, which can be used to make DNS requests to a server an attacker controls; as well as Oracle Database’s UTL_HTTP package, which can be used to send HTTP requests from SQL and PL/SQL to a server an attacker controls.

bettercap is a tool that can perform session hijacking attacks on wireless networks, among other network security and penetration testing tasks. bettercap can capture and manipulate network traffic, perform man-in-the-middle attacks, spoof and sniff protocols, inject custom payloads, and more1.

bettercap can perform session hijacking attacks on wireless networks that use the WPA-PSK security protocol by exploiting the four-way handshake process that occurs when a client connects to a wireless access point. The four-way handshake is used to establish a shared encryption key between the client and the access point, based on the pre-shared key (PSK) that is configured on both devices. However, the four-way handshake also exposes some information that can be used to crack the PSK offline, such as the nonce values, the MAC addresses, and the message integrity code (MIC) of the packets2.

bettercap can capture the four-way handshake packets using its Wi-Fi module and save them in a file. The file can then be fed to a tool like Hashcat or Aircrack-ng to crack the PSK using brute force or dictionary attacks. Once the PSK is obtained, bettercap can use it to decrypt the wireless traffic and perform session hijacking attacks on the clients connected to the access point3.

Therefore, bettercap is an appropriate tool to carry out a session hijacking attack on a wireless network that uses the WPA-PSK security protocol.

Email spoofing is the fabrication of an email header in the hopes of duping the recipient into thinking the email originated from someone or somewhere other than the intended source. Because core email protocols do not have a built-in method of authentication, it is common for spam and phishing emails to use said spoofing to trick the recipient into trusting the origin of the message.

The ultimate goal of email spoofing is to get recipients to open, and possibly even respond to, a solicitation. Although the spoofed messages are usually just a nuisance requiring little action besides removal, the more malicious varieties can cause significant problems and sometimes pose a real security threat.

==================================================================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Fake antivirus (also known as scareware) tricks users into downloading malware disguised as legitimate antivirus software.

The best approach:

Google the product name and URL.

Check reputable forums, antivirus vendors, or security advisories.

Look for phishing warnings or reports of malware.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 7: Social Engineering and Phishing Scams

Module 6: Malware Threats → Rogue Software

In CEH v13 Module 06: Malware Threats, a worm is described as a self-replicating piece of malware that spreads independently from one system to another without needing to attach itself to any file or program (unlike viruses).

Key Characteristics of Worms:

Capable of network propagation without human interaction.

Often used in mass attacks (e.g., WannaCry, Conficker).

Can cause significant damage by:

Consuming bandwidth.

Spreading payloads (e.g., ransomware).

Modifying or deleting files.

Option Clarification:

A. Rootkit: Hides presence of malware or attacker activities.

B. Trojan: Disguised as legitimate software; does not replicate.

C. Worm: Correct – self-replicating and spreads automatically.

D. Adware: Primarily shows ads; not typically destructive or self-replicating.

Reconnaissance is the first phase of ethical hacking and also part of the cyber kill chain. It involves gathering publicly available information about a target, such as employee names, company structure, and branding, which is later used in social engineering or phishing attacks.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 2: Footprinting and Reconnaissance

Quote:

“Reconnaissance involves gathering information from public sources such as websites, social networks, and press releases. This is used to craft targeted phishing messages or exploit organizational weaknesses.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A & B. Not formal terms in ethical hacking.

D. Enumeration involves interacting with systems to extract technical data.

Agent-based scanners reside on a single machine but can scan several machines on the same network.

Network-based scanner

A network-based vulnerability scanner, in simplistic terms, is the process of identifying loopholes on a computer’s network or IT assets, which hackers and threat actors can exploit. By implementing this process, one can successfully identify their organization’s current risk(s). This is not where the buck stops; one can also verify the effectiveness of your system's security measures while improving internal and external defenses. Through this review, an organization is well equipped to take an extensive inventory of all systems, including operating systems, installed software, security patches, hardware, firewalls, anti-virus software, and much more.

Agent-based scanner

Agent-based scanners make use of software scanners on each and every device; the results of the scans are reported back to the central server. Such scanners are well equipped to find and report out on a range of vulnerabilities.

NOTE: This option is not suitable for us, since for it to work, you need to install a special agent on each computer before you start collecting data from them.

File system permissions

Processes may automatically execute specific binaries as part of their functionality or to perform other actions. If the permissions on the file system directory containing a target binary, or permissions on the binary itself, are improperly set, then the target binary may be overwritten with another binary using user-level permissions and executed by the original process. If the original process and thread are running under a higher permissions level, then the replaced binary will also execute under higher-level permissions, which could include SYSTEM.

Adversaries may use this technique to replace legitimate binaries with malicious ones as a means of executing code at a higher permissions level. If the executing process is set to run at a specific time or during a certain event (e.g., system bootup) then this technique can also be used for persistence.

The meet-in-the-middle attack (MITM), a known plaintext attack, is a generic space–time tradeoff cryptographic attack against encryption schemes that rely on performing multiple encryption operations in sequence. The MITM attack is the primary reason why Double DES is not used and why a Triple DES key (168-bit) can be bruteforced by an attacker with 256 space and 2112 operations.

The intruder has to know some parts of plaintext and their ciphertexts. Using meet-in-the-middle attacks it is possible to break ciphers, which have two or more secret keys for multiple encryption using the same algorithm. For example, the 3DES cipher works in this way. Meet-in-the-middle attack was first presented by Diffie and Hellman for cryptanalysis of DES algorithm.

One of the most common Nmap usage scenarios is scanning an Ethernet LAN. Most LANs, especially those that use the private address range granted by RFC 1918, do not always use the overwhelming majority of IP addresses. When Nmap attempts to send a raw IP packet, such as an ICMP echo request, the OS must determine a destination hardware (ARP) address, such as the target IP, so that the Ethernet frame can be properly addressed. .. This is required to issue a series of ARP requests. This is best illustrated by an example where a ping scan is attempted against an Area Ethernet host. The –send-ip option tells Nmap to send IP-level packets (rather than raw Ethernet), even on area networks. The Wireshark output of the three ARP requests and their timing have been pasted into the session.

Raw IP ping scan example for offline targets

This example took quite a couple of seconds to finish because the (Linux) OS sent three ARP requests at 1 second intervals before abandoning the host. Waiting for a few seconds is excessive, as long as the ARP response usually arrives within a few milliseconds. Reducing this timeout period is not a priority for OS vendors, as the overwhelming majority of packets are sent to the host that actually exists. Nmap, on the other hand, needs to send packets to 16 million IP s given a target like 10.0.0.0/8. Many targets are pinged in parallel, but waiting 2 seconds each is very delayed.

There is another problem with raw IP ping scans on the LAN. If the destination host turns out to be unresponsive, as in the previous example, the source host usually adds an incomplete entry for that destination IP to the kernel ARP table. ARP tablespaces are finite and some operating systems become unresponsive when full. If Nmap is used in rawIP mode (–send-ip), Nmap may have to wait a few minutes for the ARP cache entry to expire before continuing host discovery.

ARP scans solve both problems by giving Nmap the highest priority. Nmap issues raw ARP requests and handles retransmissions and timeout periods in its sole discretion. The system ARP cache is bypassed. The example shows the difference. This ARP scan takes just over a tenth of the time it takes for an equivalent IP.

Example b ARP ping scan of offline target

In example b, neither the -PR option nor the -send-eth option has any effect. This is often because ARP has a default scan type on the Area Ethernet network when scanning Ethernet hosts that Nmap discovers. This includes traditional wired Ethernet as 802.11 wireless networks. As mentioned above, ARP scanning is not only more efficient, but also more accurate. Hosts frequently block IP-based ping packets, but usually cannot block ARP requests or responses and communicate over the network.Nmap uses ARP instead of all targets on equivalent targets, even if different ping types (such as -PE and -PS) are specified. LAN.. If you do not need to attempt an ARP scan at all, specify –send-ip as shown in Example a “Raw IP Ping Scan for Offline Targets”.

If you give Nmap control to send raw Ethernet frames, Nmap can also adjust the source MAC address. If you have the only PowerBook in your security conference room and a large ARP scan is initiated from an Apple-registered MAC address, your head may turn to you. Use the –spoof-mac option to spoof the MAC address as described in the MAC Address Spoofing section.

The scenario describes an API vulnerability where unauthorized users are able to view, modify, or delete sensitive data by interacting with API objects. This indicates a failure in access control—specifically, a lack of Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) validation.

Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC):

ABAC is an advanced access control model that evaluates access permissions based on attributes of the user, the resource, and the environment (e.g., user role, data sensitivity, location, etc.).

When ABAC is not properly implemented ("No ABAC validation"), APIs may allow users to access or manipulate objects they shouldn't have access to.

In APIs, this typically results in vulnerabilities like Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), where users can tamper with object identifiers (IDs) to access or alter data that doesn’t belong to them.

This is one of the top risks highlighted by the OWASP API Security Top 10 (e.g., Broken Object Level Authorization).

Incorrect Options:

A. Code injection refers to injecting malicious code (e.g., SQLi, XSS), not improper access control.

B. Improper use of CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) may lead to unauthorized data exposure but doesn’t describe unauthorized object access in an API.

D. Business logic flaws relate to weaknesses in application workflows and rules, not direct access control failures.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: "API Security Threats"

Subsection: "Access Control Failures in APIs (IDOR, BOLA, ABAC-related flaws)"

OWASP API Security Top 10: 2023 – A1: Broken Object Level Authorization

CEH iLabs and CEH Engage also demonstrate API-based attack vectors exploiting access control weaknesses.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The AAAA (Quad A) record is the DNS record type used to map a domain name to an IPv6 address. It is the IPv6 equivalent of an A (Address) record, which maps to an IPv4 address.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 4: Enumeration → DNS Record Types

In CEH v13 Module 17: Mobile and IoT Security, Advanced SMS Phishing (also known as SMiShing) is described as a technique where attackers impersonate trusted entities via SMS to:

Trick users into entering authentication codes or PINs.

Deliver malicious payloads or alter device configurations.

Simulate OTA (Over-the-Air) provisioning messages.

In this case:

The attacker sends a fake OTA setup message asking for a PIN.

Once Ben enters the PIN, the device's configuration is hijacked.

Why Others Are Incorrect:

B. Bypass SSL pinning: Relates to mobile app reverse engineering and traffic interception.

C. Phishing: General term; SMS-specific variant is more accurate here.

D. Tap ‘n ghost: A touch screen manipulation attack, unrelated to messaging.

Correct answer is A. Advanced SMS phishing.

Agent Smith Attack

Agent Smith attacks are carried out by luring victims into downloading and installing malicious

apps designed and published by attackers in the form of games, photo editors, or other

attractive tools from third-party app stores such as 9Apps. Once the user has installed the app,

the core malicious code inside the application infects or replaces the legitimate apps in the

victim's mobile device C&C commands. The deceptive application replaces legitimate apps such

as WhatsApp, SHAREit, and MX Player with similar infected versions. The application sometimes

also appears to be an authentic Google product such as Google Updater or Themes. The

attacker then produces a massive volume of irrelevant and fraudulent advertisements on the

victim's device through the infected app for financial gain. Attackers exploit these apps to steal

critical information such as personal information, credentials, and bank details, from the

victim's mobile device through C&C commands.

The phrase "testing the network using the same methodologies and tools employed by attackers" precisely describes Penetration Testing.

Penetration testing involves:

Simulating real-world attacks.

Using tools and techniques similar to those used by malicious hackers.

Actively exploiting vulnerabilities to assess the security posture of systems.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 1: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Module 5: Vulnerability Assessment vs. Penetration Testing

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Penetration testing is a simulated cyberattack against your system to check for exploitable vulnerabilities. It uses the same tools, techniques, and processes as attackers to find and validate security weaknesses.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Vulnerability Scanning: Only identifies potential issues; it doesn’t attempt to exploit them.

C. Security Policy Implementation: Refers to governance and documentation, not testing.

D. Designing Network Security: Refers to planning a secure architecture.

Promiscuous mode is a configuration for a network interface card (NIC) that allows it to pass all network traffic to the CPU for processing, not just the traffic addressed to that NIC. It is commonly used in:

Network sniffing and monitoring

Packet analysis tools like Wireshark

IDS/IPS systems

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 8: Sniffing

Quote:

“Promiscuous mode allows a NIC to capture all packets on the network segment, regardless of the destination MAC address.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Multicast mode handles group address traffic, not all frames

C. WEM is not a valid network mode term

D. Port forwarding redirects traffic to specific internal IPs

===========

The given command is used to establish a null session connection with the IPC$ share on a Windows machine. IPC$ (Inter-Process Communication) is a special hidden share used for Windows inter-process communication, and when connected with blank credentials, it allows anonymous access to certain system information — a common step in enumeration.

Command breakdown:

net use \target\ipc$ "" /u:""

→ Initiates a connection using a blank username and password (null session).

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 04: Enumeration

Topic: Null Sessions and SMB Enumeration

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“A null session allows unauthorized users to connect to a Windows machine and extract information like usernames, shares, and policies. Null sessions exploit the default settings of the IPC$ share and are typically initiated using net use commands.”

Incorrect Options:

A/B: Accessing the etc/passwd or SAM directly is not the function of this command.

C: Samba uses SMB, but this is targeting a Windows system.

E: Cisco router enumeration involves SNMP, not Windows IPC$.

Blind SQL Injection is a type of SQL injection attack where no error messages or data are directly returned to the attacker. Instead, the attacker sends specially crafted SQL queries that result in true or false responses. Based on how the application responds (such as redirecting to a different page or loading time), the attacker infers information about the backend database.

According to CEH v13:

Blind SQLi is used when standard SQL injection yields no visible output.

It comes in two forms:

Boolean-based: Infers information based on application behavior.

Time-based: Infers information based on server response time delays.

Incorrect Options:

A. Time-based SQLi is a sub-type of Blind SQLi, but the question describes Boolean-based behavior.

B. Union SQL injection uses the UNION keyword to fetch additional rows; requires visible output.

C. Error-based SQL injection relies on database error messages.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: “Types of SQL Injection”

Subsection: “Blind SQL Injection (Boolean and Time-Based)”

===========

Worker Message Block (SMB) is an organization document sharing and information texture convention. SMB is utilized by billions of gadgets in a different arrangement of working frameworks, including Windows, MacOS, iOS , Linux, and Android. Customers use SMB to get to information on workers. This permits sharing of records, unified information the board, and brought down capacity limit needs for cell phones. Workers additionally use SMB as a feature of the Software-characterized Data Center for outstanding burdens like grouping and replication.

Since SMB is a far off record framework, it requires security from assaults where a Windows PC may be fooled into reaching a pernicious worker running inside a confided in organization or to a far off worker outside the organization edge. Firewall best practices and arrangements can upgrade security keeping malevolent traffic from leaving the PC or its organization.

For Windows customers and workers that don’t have SMB shares, you can obstruct all inbound SMB traffic utilizing the Windows Defender Firewall to keep far off associations from malignant or bargained gadgets. In the Windows Defender Firewall, this incorporates the accompanying inbound principles.

You should also create a new blocking rule to override any other inbound firewall rules. Use the following suggested settings for any Windows clients or servers that do not host SMB Shares:

Name: Block all inbound SMB 445

Description: Blocks all inbound SMB TCP 445 traffic. Not to be applied to domain controllers or computers that host SMB shares.

Action: Block the connection

Programs: All

Remote Computers: Any

Protocol Type: TCP

Local Port: 445

Remote Port: Any

Profiles: All

Scope (Local IP Address): Any

Scope (Remote IP Address): Any

Edge Traversal: Block edge traversal

You must not globally block inbound SMB traffic to domain controllers or file servers. However, you can restrict access to them from trusted IP ranges and devices to lower their attack surface. They should also be restricted to Domain or Private firewall profiles and not allow Guest/Public traffic.

In CEH v13 Module 03: Scanning Networks, Nmap includes timing templates for controlling the speed and stealthiness of scans.

-T5: Insane mode – very fast, highly aggressive, easily detectable.

-T0: Paranoid mode – very slow and stealthy.

-O: Enables OS detection (not related to scan speed).

-A: Enables OS detection, version detection, script scanning, and traceroute (comprehensive but not specifically about speed).

Therefore:

If speed is your goal and you are not concerned about detection, then:

-T5 is the correct answer.

Hashing algorithms (such as SHA-256 or MD5) are used to generate a unique digital fingerprint of a file or message. Once the CFO approves the financial statement, generating a hash value for the document ensures that if any modification occurs (even a single bit), the hash value will change, indicating a breach in data integrity.

This solution directly addresses integrity — one of the three components of the CIA triad (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability). Password protection or transferring via USB does not ensure integrity; they offer access control and delivery security.

LAN Manager (LM) hashes use the DES (Data Encryption Standard) algorithm to hash passwords. Here's how LM hashing works:

The password is converted to uppercase and padded/truncated to 14 characters.

Split into two 7-character halves.

Each half is used as a DES key to encrypt a constant string ("KGS!@#$%")—resulting in a 16-byte LM hash.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats

Topic: Windows Password Storage & Cracking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“LM hashes use the DES encryption algorithm to create password hashes. Due to this method, they are highly vulnerable to brute-force attacks, particularly because they split the password into two 7-character blocks.”

Incorrect Options:

A: MD4 is used in NTLM hashes.

C: SHA is not used in LM.

D: SSL is a transport security protocol, not a hashing algorithm.

A brute-force attack is the most exhaustive password-cracking method. It tries every possible combination of characters (letters, numbers, and symbols) until the correct password is found.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Password Cracking Techniques

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Brute-force attacks try every possible combination until the correct password is discovered. It’s resource-intensive but guarantees success if enough time and processing power is available.”

Incorrect Options:

B: Refers to social engineering or coercion.

C: Describes a dictionary attack.

D: Refers to a rainbow table attack.

E: Not a cracking method.

LAN Manager (LM) hashes are legacy password hashing methods used in older Windows systems (including Windows 2000 for backward compatibility). LM hashing works by:

Converting the password to uppercase.

Padding or truncating it to 14 characters.

Splitting it into two 7-character halves.

Using each half as a DES key to encrypt a known constant ("KGS!@#$%").

Therefore, LM hashing uses the DES (Data Encryption Standard) algorithm.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → Password Storage and LM Hash Structure

Vulnerability scanning software is a tool that can help security analysts identify and prioritize known vulnerabilities in their systems and applications. However, it is not a perfect solution and has some limitations that need to be considered. One of the most critical limitations is that vulnerability scanning software is not immune to software engineering flaws that might lead to serious vulnerabilities being missed. This means that the software itself might have bugs, errors, or oversights that could affect its accuracy, reliability, or performance. For example, the software might:

Fail to detect some vulnerabilities due to incomplete or outdated databases, incorrect signatures, or insufficient coverage of the target system or application.

Produce false positives or false negatives due to misinterpretation of the scan results, incorrect configuration, or lack of context or validation.

Cause unintended consequences or damage to the target system or application due to intrusive or aggressive scanning techniques, such as exploiting vulnerabilities, modifying data, or crashing services.

Be vulnerable to attacks or compromise by malicious actors who could exploit its weaknesses, tamper with its functionality, or steal its data.

Therefore, the security analyst should be most cautious about this limitation of vulnerability scanning software, as it could lead to a false sense of security, missed opportunities for remediation, or increased exposure to threats. The security analyst should always verify the scan results, use multiple tools and methods, and update and patch the software regularly to mitigate this risk.

Nmap provides a scripting engine (NSE) that includes a script named http-methods. This script sends OPTIONS requests to the web server to determine which HTTP methods are supported. Identifying risky methods like PUT and DELETE helps detect misconfigured or vulnerable web servers.

Example command:

nmap --script http-methods -p 80

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 11: Hacking Web Applications

Quote:

“The Nmap script http-methods helps identify enabled HTTP methods including potentially dangerous ones like PUT and DELETE.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

B. http-enum is used to enumerate directories and applications, not methods.

C. http-headers retrieves HTTP headers.

D. http-git checks for Git repositories on web servers.

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

ARP Poisoning (Address Resolution Protocol Poisoning) is a classic Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) attack in a LAN environment. It works by sending fake ARP replies to devices on a network to associate the attacker’s MAC address with the IP address of another host (typically the default gateway). As a result:

Network traffic meant for the gateway is sent to the attacker instead.

The attacker can then intercept, modify, or forward the traffic to the actual destination, performing a full MiTM.

This allows the attacker to:

Sniff sensitive data (e.g., credentials, emails)

Hijack sessions

Inject malicious payloads

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing

Topic: MiTM Attacks → ARP Spoofing Techniques

Incorrect Options:

A. Password Sniffing is a result of MiTM but not a technique itself.

C. MAC Flooding is a switch attack that floods the CAM table to make the switch act like a hub.

D. DHCP Sniffing relates to capturing DHCP messages but is not commonly used for MiTM.

A Collision attack is a type of cryptographic attack that targets the hash function. The goal of this attack is to find two different inputs that produce the same hash output. This undermines the integrity of the hashing algorithm, as hash functions are expected to produce a unique output for each unique input.

In practical terms, if two different documents (inputs) produce the same hash value (collision), an attacker can replace a legitimate file with a malicious one without detection, assuming the system validates integrity only via the hash.

CEH v13 defines a collision attack as follows:

"A collision attack focuses on finding two different messages (M1 and M2) that produce the same hash value. This can compromise digital signatures, certificates, and other security protocols."

Reference – CEH v13 Study Guide:

Module 20: Cryptography, Section: “Hashing Algorithms and Attacks”, Subsection: “Collision Attacks”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A: Public keys are part of asymmetric encryption, not relevant to collisions.

B/C: These are incorrect descriptions; collision attacks are not about breaking hashes into parts to retrieve plaintext or private keys.

‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒

Nikto is a free software command-line vulnerability scanner that scans web servers for dangerous files/CGIs, outdated server software, and other problems. It performs generic and server types specific checks. It also captures and prints any cookies received. The Nikto code itself is free software, but the data files it uses to drive the program are not.

Command Breakdown:

nc: Netcat utility

-l: Listen mode

-u: Use UDP protocol

-p 55555: Listen on port 55555

< /etc/passwd: Redirects the contents of /etc/passwd into the socket

This means that when a connection is made to UDP port 55555, the contents of /etc/passwd will be sent to the connecting host.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing & Network Communication Tools

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Netcat can be used to serve files, open shells, or transfer data. Using input redirection, it can stream file contents to anyone who connects.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Does not log; it outputs /etc/passwd

C: The opposite; it serves the file, doesn’t grab it

D: Netcat does not delete files with this syntax

In LM hashing (used in legacy Windows systems), passwords are split into two 7-character chunks. If a password is fewer than 8 characters, the second half is padded with nulls and hashed to a constant value.

That constant is:

AAD3B435B51404EE

Thus, the second half of the LM hash (the rightmost 16 characters) is always the same if the password is < 8 characters.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → LM Hash Characteristics

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“If the password is less than 8 characters, the second half of the LM hash will always be ‘AAD3B435B51404EE’, indicating the hash belongs to a short password.”

In CEH v13 Module 13: Hacking Web Applications, Server-Side Includes (SSI) is defined as a method for dynamically generating web content through directives embedded in HTML files.

stm File Extension:

Associated with Server Side Includes (SSI).

Files like .stm, .shtml, and .shtm can embed server-side directives.

Vulnerable if user input is improperly handled, allowing command injection or arbitrary file access.

Option Clarification:

A. .stm: Correct – indicates SSI is enabled.

B. .html: Static file, not associated with SSI.

C. .rss: XML feed; irrelevant to SSI.

D. .cms: Generic; doesn’t indicate SSI functionality.

If the token itself (e.g., hardware key or smartcard) performs offline verification of the PIN, it can be physically attacked. An attacker can:

Steal the token

Try all possible PIN combinations (0000–9999)

Bypass limits if no lockout mechanisms exist

This is a brute-force attack — the attacker tries every combination until the correct one is found.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware and Authentication

Module 20: Identity and Access Management

Incorrect Options:

A: Birthday attacks are related to hash collisions.

C: MITM involves intercepting communication, not offline brute-force.

D: Smurf is a DoS attack, not related to token/PIN systems.

An iPhone client’s most noticeably terrible bad dream is to have somebody oversee his/her gadget, including the capacity to record and control all action without waiting be in a similar room. In this blog entry, we present another weakness called “Trustjacking”, which permits an aggressor to do precisely that.

This weakness misuses an iOS highlight called iTunes Wi-Fi sync, which permits a client to deal with their iOS gadget without genuinely interfacing it to their PC. A solitary tap by the iOS gadget proprietor when the two are associated with a similar organization permits an assailant to oversee the gadget. Furthermore, we will stroll through past related weaknesses and show the progressions that iPhone has made to alleviate them, and why these are adequately not to forestall comparative assaults.

After interfacing an iOS gadget to another PC, the clients are being found out if they trust the associated PC or not. Deciding to believe the PC permits it to speak with the iOS gadget by means of the standard iTunes APIs.

This permits the PC to get to the photographs on the gadget, perform reinforcement, introduce applications and considerably more, without requiring another affirmation from the client and with no recognizable sign. Besides, this permits enacting the “iTunes Wi-Fi sync” highlight, which makes it conceivable to proceed with this sort of correspondence with the gadget even after it has been detached from the PC, as long as the PC and the iOS gadget are associated with a similar organization. It is intriguing to take note of that empowering “iTunes Wi-Fi sync” doesn’t need the casualty’s endorsement and can be directed simply from the PC side.

Getting a live stream of the gadget’s screen should be possible effectively by consistently requesting screen captures and showing or recording them distantly.

It is imperative to take note of that other than the underlying single purpose of disappointment, approving the vindictive PC, there is no other component that forestalls this proceeded with access. Likewise, there isn’t anything that informs the clients that by approving the PC they permit admittance to their gadget even in the wake of detaching the USB link.

Since this question refers specifically to analyzing a wireless network, it is obvious that we need an option with AirPcap (Riverbed AirPcap USB-based adapters capture 802.11 wireless traffic for analysis). Since it works with two traffic analyzers SteelCentral Packet Analyzer (Cascade Pilot) or Wireshark, the correct option would be "Wireshark with Airpcap."

NOTE: AirPcap adapters no longer available for sale effective January 1, 2018, but a question on this topic may occur on your exam.

===========

In CEH v13 Module 09: Social Engineering, scareware is defined as a malicious tactic that uses fear, panic, or urgency to trick users into performing harmful actions such as downloading fake software or clicking malicious links.

Common Scareware Example:

A pop-up warns the user: “Your system is infected! Install this antivirus now!”

Victim downloads malware disguised as a solution.

Often used to deliver spyware, ransomware, or trojans.

Option Review:

A. Free cruise: Classic example of baiting, not scareware.

B. Account locked: Closer to phishing or credential harvesting.

C. Delivery delay: Another phishing variation.

D. Pop-up about infection: True scareware tactic.

Infoga may be a tool gathering email accounts informations (ip,hostname,country,…) from completely different public supply (search engines, pgp key servers and shodan) and check if email was leaked using haveibeenpwned.com API. is a really simple tool, however very effective for the first stages of a penetration test or just to know the visibility of your company within the net.

Scammers often impersonate legitimate organizations using free email services like @yahoo.com. "Yahoo Bank" is not a legitimate institution, and a real financial entity would use an official domain (e.g., @yahoobank.com). This is a textbook phishing/smishing attempt.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 9: Social Engineering

Quote:

“Attackers often use free email services and impersonate authority figures to trick users. Always verify the sender’s domain and context.”

Incorrect Options:

B. Irrelevant—legitimate people may be unknown too.

C. Responding increases risk.

D. It is not from a verified organization.

===========

Pharming is a cyberattack technique in which malicious code is used to redirect a website’s traffic to a fraudulent or malicious website without the user's knowledge. This redirection typically occurs through:

DNS poisoning or host file modification

Exploitation of vulnerabilities in DNS servers or user machines

Pharming aims to collect sensitive data (like usernames, passwords, credit card details) by making users believe they are interacting with a legitimate website when, in fact, they are on a fake one.

As per CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Pharming is a server-side or client-side attack that manipulates how URLs are resolved.

It differs from phishing in that it does not rely on fake emails or social engineering but rather on redirecting web traffic via compromised DNS infrastructure or local configuration.

Incorrect Options:

A. Spimming is the use of spam over instant messaging.

C. Phishing involves tricking users through fake emails or messages.

D. Spear-phishing is a targeted version of phishing directed at specific individuals or roles.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 09: Social Engineering

Section: “Phishing and Pharming Attacks”

Subsection: “Differences Between Phishing and Pharming”

A cryptographic hash function is used to ensure data integrity. It generates a fixed-length output (digest) from any size of input data. If the data is modified in any way, the resulting hash will change. This allows systems to detect data tampering, ensuring that the data remains unaltered from its original form.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 20: Cryptography

Quote:

“Hash functions are used to ensure the integrity of a message or file by producing a unique digest that changes if the data is modified.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Authentication ensures identity, not data integrity.

B. Confidentiality is achieved via encryption, not hashing.

C. Availability pertains to system uptime and accessibility, not hashes.

===========

Firewalking is a technique used to determine what layer 4 protocols a firewall will allow by sending crafted packets with TTL values that expire at the firewall and analyzing ICMP Time Exceeded responses. This helps in determining what ports and services are allowed through a firewall.

???? Reference – CEH v13 Study Guide, Module 11: Evading IDS, Firewalls, and Honeypots

“Firewalking is a technique used to gather information about firewalls and their rule sets by sending packets with TTL values that expire at the firewall.”

❌ Incorrect options:

A. Session hijacking refers to taking over an active session.

C. MITM attacks involve intercepting communications between two parties.

D. Network sniffing involves capturing packets, not probing firewall rules.

A Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) is a security policy enforcement point, either on-premises or in the cloud, that administers an organization’s enterprise security policies when users attempt to access its cloud-based resources. A CASB can provide unified security management across multiple cloud platforms, as it can monitor cloud activity, enforce security policies, identify and respond to threats, and maintain visibility of all cloud resources. A CASB can also integrate with other security tools, such as data loss prevention (DLP), encryption, malware detection, and identity and access management (IAM), to enhance the security posture of the organization.

The other options are not as effective or feasible as using a CASB. Using a hardware-based firewall to secure all cloud resources may not be compatible with the dynamic and scalable nature of the cloud, as it may introduce latency, complexity, and cost. Implementing separate security management tools for each cloud platform may create inconsistency, inefficiency, and confusion, as each tool may have different features, interfaces, and configurations. Relying on the built-in security features of each cloud platform may not be sufficient or comprehensive, as each platform may have different levels of security, compliance, and functionality. References:

What Is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)? | Microsoft

What Is a CASB? - Cloud Access Security Broker - Cisco

What is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)?

Analyze Web Applications: Identify Files and Directories - enumerate applications, as well as hidden directories and files of the web application hosted on the web server. Tools such as ☆Gobuster is directory scanner that allows attackers to perform fast-paced enumeration of hidden files and directories of a target web application. # gobuster -u -w common.txt (wordlist) (P.1849/1833)

In CEH v13 Module 05: System Hacking, and Module 14: Access Control, Identity Management, and Cryptography, Single Sign-On (SSO) is defined as a system that allows users to authenticate once and gain access to multiple systems without re-entering credentials.

SSO uses a Central Authentication Server (CAS).

Common technologies: Kerberos, OAuth, SAML, AD Federation Services.

Improves user convenience and centralized credential management.

The attacker has most likely used RST hijacking, which is a type of network-level session hijacking technique that exploits the TCP reset (RST) mechanism. TCP reset is a way of terminating an established TCP connection by sending a packet with the RST flag set, indicating that the sender does not want to continue the communication. RST hijacking involves sending a forged RST packet to one or both ends of a TCP connection, using a spoofed source IP address and a guessed acknowledgment number, to trick them into believing that the other end has closed the connection. As a result, the victim’s connection is reset and the attacker can take over the session or launch a denial-of-service attack12.

The other options are not correct for the following reasons:

A. TCP/IP hijacking: This option is a general term that refers to any type of network-level session hijacking technique that targets TCP/IP connections. RST hijacking is a specific type of TCP/IP hijacking, but not the only one. Other types of TCP/IP hijacking include SYN hijacking, source routing, and sequence prediction3.

B. UDP hijacking: This option is not applicable because UDP is a connectionless protocol that does not use TCP reset mechanism. UDP hijacking is a type of network-level session hijacking technique that targets UDP connections, such as DNS or VoIP. UDP hijacking involves intercepting and modifying UDP packets to redirect or manipulate the communication between the sender and the receiver4.

D. Blind hijacking: This option is not accurate because blind hijacking is a type of network-level session hijacking technique that does not require injecting RST packets. Blind hijacking involves guessing the sequence and acknowledgment numbers of a TCP connection without being able to see the responses from the target. Blind hijacking can be used to inject malicious data or commands into an active TCP session, but not to reset the connection5.

Hashing algorithms are specifically designed to ensure data integrity. A hash function takes an input and returns a fixed-length string, called a hash or message digest. Even a small change in the input results in a completely different hash, making it useful for detecting tampering.

Common hashing algorithms include:

MD5 (now obsolete for secure uses)

SHA-1, SHA-2, SHA-3

HMAC (Hashed Message Authentication Code)

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 20: Cryptography

Topic: Hash Functions and Data Integrity

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Hashing algorithms provide integrity by generating a unique digital fingerprint of data. Any alteration in the message content will result in a different hash value, indicating that the integrity has been compromised.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Symmetric algorithms provide confidentiality.

B: Asymmetric algorithms provide confidentiality and authentication.

D: "Integrity algorithms" is not a formal cryptographic term.

In CEH v13 Module 13: Hacking Web Applications, this exact payload is an example of an XXE (XML External Entity) Attack.

XXE Attack:

Exploits the way XML parsers process DOCTYPE declarations.

The payload references a local file (/etc/passwd), allowing local file inclusion.

Can result in sensitive file disclosure, SSRF, or Denial of Service (DoS).

Option Clarification:

A. XXE: Correct – targets vulnerable XML parsers.

B. SQLi: Targets SQL databases with ' OR '1'='1-type injections.

C. IDOR: Insecure Direct Object Reference, not related to XML.

D. XSS: Cross-site scripting; this is XML-based, not JavaScript injection.

A Boot Sector Virus infects the master boot record (MBR) of the system. When a system boots, it first loads the MBR into memory. A Boot Sector Virus takes advantage of this by moving the original MBR to a different location on the hard disk and writing itself to the original MBR location. This ensures that it is executed first during system startup.

As per CEH v13 course material:

“A boot sector virus infects the master boot record of a hard disk. It moves the original boot sector to a different location on the hard disk and replaces it with its own malicious code. When the computer is booted, the virus loads first and then hands control to the original boot sector code.”

Reference – CEH v13 Study Guide:

Module 06: Malware Threats, Section: “Types of Malware”, Subsection: “Boot Sector Viruses”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A: Describes directory virus behavior, not boot sector.

B: The virus moves MBR on the hard disk, not RAM.

D: Some viruses overwrite MBR, but most preserve the original and move it to another disk location to maintain system operability.

These types of attacks occur when faults or glitches are INJECTED into the Power supply that can be used for remote execution.

The action that would best protect your web server from potential misconfiguration-based attacks is performing regular server configuration audits. A server configuration audit is a process of reviewing and verifying the security settings and parameters of the server, such as user accounts, permissions, services, ports, protocols, files, directories, logs, and patches. A server configuration audit can help you to identify and fix any security misconfigurations that may expose your server to attacks, such as using default credentials, enabling unnecessary services, leaving open ports, or missing security updates. A server configuration audit can also help you to comply with the security standards and best practices for your server, such as the CIS Benchmarks or the OWASP Secure Configuration Guide12.

The other options are not as effective as option A for the following reasons:

B. Enabling multi-factor authentication for users: This option is not relevant because it does not address the server misconfiguration issue, but the user authentication issue. Multi-factor authentication is a method of verifying the identity of the users by requiring them to provide two or more pieces of evidence, such as a password, a code, or a biometric factor. Multi-factor authentication can enhance the security of the user accounts and prevent unauthorized access, but it does not prevent the server from being attacked due to misconfigured settings or parameters3.

C. Implementing a firewall to filter traffic: This option is not sufficient because it does not prevent the server from being misconfigured, but only limits the exposure of the server to the network. A firewall is a device or software that monitors and controls the incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predefined rules. A firewall can protect the server from external attacks by blocking or allowing certain ports, protocols, or IP addresses. However, a firewall cannot protect the server from internal attacks or from attacks that exploit the allowed traffic. Moreover, a firewall itself can be misconfigured and cause security issues4.

D. Regularly backing up server data: This option is not preventive but reactive, as it does not protect the server from being attacked, but only helps to recover the data in case of an attack. Backing up server data is a process of creating and storing copies of the data on the server, such as files, databases, or configurations. Backing up server data can help you to restore the data in case of data loss, corruption, or deletion due to an attack. However, backing up server data does not prevent the server from being attacked in the first place, and it does not fix the security misconfigurations that may have caused the attack5.

The described scenario is a textbook example of a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack. In such attacks, the attacker stealthily places themselves between two communicating systems, intercepts their communications, and may even modify the traffic. The communicating parties remain unaware that their traffic is being monitored or altered.

Eric is using the Dsniff toolset, which is well-known for enabling MITM attacks through techniques such as:

ARP spoofing (to redirect traffic)

Credential sniffing

Packet manipulation

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing

Module 11: Session Hijacking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“In a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, the attacker intercepts and potentially alters the communication between two systems without either party knowing. Tools like Dsniff, Cain & Abel, and Ettercap are commonly used to launch such attacks.”

Incorrect Options:

A: “Interceptor” is not a technical term in cybersecurity.

C: ARP Proxy is a network feature; while ARP spoofing can be part of a MITM attack, it’s not the attack classification itself.

D: Poisoning (like DNS or ARP poisoning) is often a technique used to initiate MITM but not the final classification.

-A: Perform an aggressive scan which select most of the commonly used options within nmap

-Pn: Means Don't ping

-p:scan specific ports

-sT: TCP Connect scan

-O: Operating system detection

-T0: timing template (extremely slow- evade FW)0

The sequence of actions that would provide the most comprehensive information about the network’s status is to use Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan on the entire subnet, then use Nmap for a SYN scan on identified active hosts, and finally use Metasploit to exploit identified vulnerabilities. This sequence of actions works as follows:

Use Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan on the entire subnet: This action is used to discover the active hosts on the network by sending ICMP echo request packets to each possible IP address on the subnet and waiting for ICMP echo reply packets from the hosts. Hping3 is a command-line tool that can craft and send custom packets, such as TCP, UDP, or ICMP, and analyze the responses. By using Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan, the hacker can quickly and efficiently identify the live hosts on the network, as well as their response times and packet loss rates12.

Use Nmap for a SYN scan on identified active hosts: This action is used to scan the open ports and services on the active hosts by sending TCP SYN packets to a range of ports and analyzing the TCP responses. Nmap is a popular and powerful tool that can perform various types of network scans, such as port scanning, service detection, OS detection, and vulnerability scanning. By using Nmap for a SYN scan, the hacker can determine the state of the ports on the active hosts, such as open, closed, filtered, or unfiltered, as well as the services and protocols running on them. A SYN scan is also known as a stealth scan, as it does not complete the TCP three-way handshake and thus avoids logging on the target system34.

Use Metasploit to exploit identified vulnerabilities: This action is used to exploit the vulnerabilities on the active hosts by using pre-built or custom modules that leverage the open ports and services. Metasploit is a framework that contains a collection of tools and modules for penetration testing and exploitation. By using Metasploit, the hacker can launch various attacks on the active hosts, such as remote code execution, privilege escalation, or backdoor installation, and gain access to the target system or data. Metasploit can also be used to perform post-exploitation tasks, such as gathering information, maintaining persistence, or pivoting to other systems .

The other options are not as comprehensive as option B for the following reasons:

A. Initiate with Nmap for a ping sweep, then use Metasploit to scan for open ports and services, and finally use Hping3 to perform remote OS fingerprinting: This option is not optimal because it does not use the tools in the most efficient and effective way. Nmap can perform a ping sweep, but it is slower and less flexible than Hping3, which can craft and send custom packets. Metasploit can scan for open ports and services, but it is more suitable for exploitation than scanning, and it relies on Nmap for port scanning anyway. Hping3 can perform remote OS fingerprinting, but it is less accurate and reliable than Nmap, which can use various techniques and probes to determine the OS type and version13 .

C. Start with Hping3 for a UDP scan on random ports, then use Nmap for a version detection scan, and finally use Metasploit to exploit detected vulnerabilities: This option is not effective because it does not use the best scanning methods and techniques. Hping3 can perform a UDP scan, but it is slower and less reliable than a TCP scan, as UDP is a connectionless protocol that does not always generate responses. Scanning random ports is also inefficient and incomplete, as it may miss important ports or services. Nmap can perform a version detection scan, but it is more useful to perform a port scan first, as it can narrow down the scope and speed up the scan. Metasploit can exploit detected vulnerabilities, but it is not clear how the hacker can identify the vulnerabilities without performing a vulnerability scan first13 .

D. Begin with NetScanTools Pro for a general network scan, then use Nmap for OS detection and version detection, and finally perform an SYN flooding with Hping3: This option is not comprehensive because it does not cover all the aspects and objectives of a network scan. NetScanTools Pro is a graphical tool that can perform various network tasks, such as ping, traceroute, DNS lookup, or port scan, but it is less powerful and versatile than Nmap or Hping3, which can perform more advanced and customized scans. Nmap can perform OS detection and version detection, but it is more useful to perform a port scan first, as it can provide more information and insights into the target system. Performing an SYN flooding with Hping3 is not a network scan, but a denial-of-service attack, which can disrupt the network and alert the target system, and it is not an ethical or legal action for a hired hacker13 .

Ettercap is a comprehensive MITM attack tool that supports live traffic interception and content injection. It can modify HTTP streams in real time and inject malicious payloads, such as JavaScript or applets, into web traffic.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 8: Sniffing

Quote:

“Ettercap allows attackers to intercept, analyze, and alter data on the fly, including injecting malicious content like Java applets in HTTP sessions during MITM attacks.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A & D. Wireshark and Tcpdump are passive sniffers with no injection capability.

C. Aircrack-ng is for Wi-Fi key cracking, not traffic manipulation.

===========

The most effective evasion technique to bypass the IDS signature detection while performing a SQL Injection attack is to leverage string concatenation to break identifiable keywords. This technique involves splitting SQL keywords or operators into smaller parts and joining them with string concatenation operators, such as ‘+’ or ‘||’. This way, the SQL query can still be executed by the database engine, but the IDS cannot recognize the keywords or operators as malicious, as they are hidden within strings. For example, the hacker could replace the keyword ‘OR’ with ‘O’||‘R’ or ‘O’+‘R’ in the SQL query, and the IDS would not be able to match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern12.

The other options are not as effective as option D for the following reasons:

A. Implement case variation by altering the case of SQL statements: This option is not effective because most SQL engines and IDS systems are case-insensitive, meaning that they treat SQL keywords and operators the same regardless of their case. Therefore, altering the case of SQL statements would not help evade the IDS signature detection, as the IDS would still be able to match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern3.

B. Employ IP fragmentation to obscure the attack payload: This option is not applicable because IP fragmentation is a network-level technique that splits IP packets into smaller fragments to fit the maximum transmission unit (MTU) of the network. IP fragmentation does not affect the content or structure of the SQL query, and it does not help evade the IDS signature detection, as the IDS would still be able to reassemble the fragments and match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern4.

C. Use Hex encoding to represent the SQL query string: This option is not feasible because Hex encoding is a method of representing binary data in hexadecimal format, such as ‘0x41’ for ‘A’. Hex encoding does not work for SQL queries, as the SQL engine would not be able to interpret the hexadecimal values as valid SQL syntax. Moreover, Hex encoding would not help evade the IDS signature detection, as the IDS would still be able to decode the hexadecimal values and match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern.

This is a fairly simple question. You must to understand what a subnet mask is and how it works.

A subnetwork or subnet is a logical subdivision of an IP network.The practice of dividing a network into two or more networks is called subnetting.

Computers that belong to the same subnet are addressed with an identical most-significant bit-group in their IP addresses. This results in the logical division of an IP address into two fields: the network number or routing prefix and the rest field or host identifier. The rest field is an identifier for a specific host or network interface.

The routing prefix may be expressed in Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) notation written as the first address of a network, followed by a slash character (/), and ending with the bit-length of the prefix. For example, 198.51.100.0/24 is the prefix of the Internet Protocol version 4 network starting at the given address, having 24 bits allocated for the network prefix, and the remaining 8 bits reserved for host addressing. Addresses in the range 198.51.100.0 to 198.51.100.255 belong to this network. The IPv6 address specification 2001:db8::/32 is a large address block with 296 addresses, having a 32-bit routing prefix.

For IPv4, a network may also be characterized by its subnet mask or netmask, which is the bitmask that when applied by a bitwise AND operation to any IP address in the network, yields the routing prefix. Subnet masks are also expressed in dot-decimal notation like an address. For example, 255.255.255.0 is the subnet mask for the prefix 198.51.100.0/24.

SMTP enumeration involves probing a mail server to gather information about users and configurations. Two important SMTP commands used in enumeration are:

VRFY: Verifies whether a particular email address or user ID exists on the mail server.

EXPN: Reveals the actual addresses behind a mailing list or alias.

These commands allow attackers or penetration testers to enumerate valid user accounts or group memberships, which can later be targeted for phishing, spam, or brute-force attacks.

Incorrect Options:

B. Daily outgoing message limits are not typically disclosed via SMTP.

C. RCPT TO is used to designate a message recipient, but it doesn't enumerate open ports.

D. Mail proxy addresses are not revealed directly via SMTP enumeration.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 04: Enumeration

Section: “SMTP Enumeration Techniques”

Tool Reference: smtp-user-enum, Netcat

===========

To block NetBIOS and related Windows networking traffic from traversing a firewall (especially from external sources), you should block the following ports:

Port 135 (TCP/UDP): Microsoft RPC endpoint mapper (DCOM/RPC)

Port 139 (TCP): NetBIOS Session Service

Port 445 (TCP): Direct-hosted SMB over TCP/IP (Windows 2000+)

These ports are commonly used for:

File sharing

RPC-based communication

Windows network services

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 3: Scanning Networks

Module 4: Enumeration

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“To prevent external enumeration, remote file sharing, and NetBIOS attacks, administrators should block inbound access to ports 135, 139, and 445 on the firewall.”

Incorrect Options:

A (110): POP3 mail service

D (161): SNMP

F (1024): High ephemeral port; not specific to NetBIOS

The Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) is a suite of Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) specifications for securing certain kinds of information provided by DNS for use on IP networks. DNSSEC is a set of extensions to DNS provide to DNS clients (resolvers) origin authentication of DNS data, authenticated denial of existence, and data integrity, but not availability or confidentiality. DNSSEC is necessary because the original DNS design did not include security but was designed to be a scalable distributed system. DNSSEC adds security while maintaining backward compatibility.

===========

Union-based SQL injection is a technique that uses the UNION SQL operator to combine the results of the original query with the results of one or more additional queries. This allows attackers to:

Retrieve data from different database tables

Extend the result set returned to the web application

Exploit the application if both queries return the same number and type of columns

According to CEH v13:

UNION SELECT can be used to enumerate tables, extract user credentials, or display sensitive data.

It requires knowledge of the structure of the original query.

Incorrect Options:

A. Error-based injection extracts data from database error messages.

B. Boolean-based blind SQLi returns true/false results to infer data.

C. Blind SQLi (generic) relies on no visible output and uses inference techniques.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: “Types of SQL Injection Attacks”

Subsection: “Union-Based SQL Injection”

===========

Fileless malware can easily evade various security controls, organizations need to focus on monitoring, detecting, and preventing malicious activities instead of using traditional approaches such as scanning for malware through file signatures.Also known as non-malware, infects legitimate software, applications, and other protocols existing in the system to perform various malicious activities.It resides in the system’s RAM. It injects malicious code into the running processes. (P.966/950)

*REST is not a specification, tool, or framework, but instead is an architectural style for web services that serves as a communication medium between various systems on the web. *RESTful APIs, which are also known as RESTful services, are designed using REST principles and HTTP communication protocols RESTful is a collection of resources that use HTTP methods such as PUT, POST, GET, and DELETE

RESTful API: RESTful API is a RESTful service that is designed using REST principles and HTTP communication protocols. RESTful is a collection of resources that use HTTP methods such as PUT, POST, GET, and DELETE. RESTful API is also designed to make applications independent to improve the overall performance, visibility, scalability, reliability, and portability of an application. APIs with the following features can be referred to as to RESTful APIs: o Stateless: The client end stores the state of the session; the server is restricted to save data during the request processing o Cacheable: The client should save responses (representations) in the cache. This feature can enhance API performance pg. 1920 CEHv11 manual.

The HTTP methods GET, POST, PUT or PATCH, and DELETE can be used with these templates to read, create, update, and delete description resources for dogs and their owners. This API style has become popular for many reasons. It is straightforward and intuitive, and learning this pattern is similar to learning a programming language API. APIs like this one are commonly called RESTful APIs, although they do not display all of the characteristics that define REST (more on REST later).

A web application firewall (WAF) is a specific form of application firewall that filters, monitors, and blocks HTTP traffic to and from a web service. By inspecting HTTP traffic, it can prevent attacks exploiting a web application's known vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), file inclusion, and improper system configuration.

In the Windows security model, SID ending in -500 is reserved for the built-in Administrator account. The SID seen in the image:

S-1-5-21-343818398-789336058-1343024091-500 → maps to user Joe

This proves that Joe is the true built-in administrator account on the domain EARTH.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 4: Enumeration

Topic: SID Enumeration and Account Discovery

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“In Windows, the account with RID 500 is always the default Administrator account. Even if renamed, its SID remains ending in -500. Enumeration of this SID allows attackers to identify privileged accounts.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Incomplete — it is not just that Joe has SID 500, but that SID 500 means Joe is the administrator.

B/C: These commands don’t validate Guest account status.

E: Incorrect — these commands explicitly prove administrator identity.

Mar 1, 2016, 7:33:28 AM 10.240.250.23 - 54373 10.249.253.15 - 22 tcp_ip

Let's just disassemble this entry.

Mar 1, 2016, 7:33:28 AM - time of the request

10.240.250.23 - 54373 - client's IP and port

10.249.253.15 - server IP

- 22 - SSH port

From CEH v13 Module 03: Scanning Networks, OS fingerprinting with Nmap (using the -O option) requires privileged access to craft raw packets (especially SYN, ACK, and ICMP). On Unix/Linux systems:

Root privileges are mandatory to perform TCP/IP stack fingerprinting.

If Nmap is run as a normal user, it fails to initiate OS scanning and exits with a message like “QUITTING!”.

So, in this case, the scan fails because the shell opened does not have elevated (root) privileges.