CIPS L4M5 Commercial Negotiation Exam Practice Test

Supplier conditioning is the process of influencing a supplier or suppliers to behave in a certain way, or to accept certain circumstances. Within a negotiation, the buyer needs to make sure that the supplier has a number of messages in mind, about the outcomes that the buyer needs to achieve and about the shared sense of purpose that buying organisation has in achieving these outcomes.

Supplier appraisal is a process of evaluating a supplier's ability to carry out a contract in term of quality, delivery, price and other contributing factors.

Supplier positioning is the process of classifying spend with a supplier in terms of the profit potential and supply risk and assists in prioritising categories of spend and developing the right strategy.

Supplier selection is the process of selecting a supplier to acquire the necessary materials to support the outputs of organisations. Selection of the best and/or the most suitable suppliers is based on assessing supplier capabilities (Shih et al., 2004).

In the scenario, the value of contract as well as the importance of purchased item justify the procurement's travel. Visiting a supplier at their HQ or operational facility may facilitate the procurement team in assessing, albeit briefly, the culture of the organisation, how busy they seem and how staff engage with each other. A visit is a good opportunity to assess supplier's capacity.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Hypothetical questionsare used to explore scenarios or options without making a commitment. For example, asking "What if we were to increase the order volume?" encourages creative thinking and testing potential agreements without binding either party. This technique is valuable in theproposing and bargaining stagesof negotiation to explore trade-offs and build mutual solutions.

Microeconomic factors refer to elements that affect individual businesses or sectors rather than the economy as a whole. In this case:

Availability of investors (B): Access to investors impacts capital availability for businesses.

Distribution channels (D): Distribution methods directly influence a business’s ability to get products to market.

Levels of competition (F): Competition affects pricing and strategic decisions within specific industries.

Taxation rates, unemployment levels, and inflation rates are considered macroeconomic factors, affecting the economy on a broader scale, as per CIPS's definitions of microeconomic vs. macroeconomic influences.

Delivering on commitments is fundamental to building high-trust relationships. When an organization reliably fulfills its promises, it reinforces the supplier’s confidence in the partnership, fostering long-term collaboration. While contract management and audits are supportive processes, delivering on commitments directly strengthens trust, as emphasized in CIPS best practices for relationship management.

The ZOPA defines the range of outcomes acceptable to both parties, while the walk-away point defines the minimum acceptable deal for the buyer. Together, these guide negotiation planning to avoid unfavourable agreements. Attendee lists and venues are logistical details, important but not central to negotiation value creation. Preparation of ZOPA and walk-away ensures structured, strategic decision-making and protects against poor deals.

Mark-upis calculated as:

Mark-up %=(ProfitCost)×100\text{Mark-up \%} = \left( \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Cost}} \right) \times 100Mark-up %=(CostProfit​)×100

In this case:

Profit = $240 - $160 = $80

Cost = $160

Mark-up = (80 / 160) × 100 =50%

“Understanding mark-up percentages helps in assessing supplier pricing behaviour and negotiating realistic margins.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models and Profit Margins)

The case in the question is illustrated as below:

The equilibrium price initially at P0 with quantity Q0, when supply curve shifts to the left, it will converge with demand curve at new equilibrium point with price P1 and quantity Q1. As you can see from the graph, P1 is greater than P0 and Q1 is smaller than Q0.

Whenmany supplierscompete forfew buyers, buyers gain leverage. This competition can drive prices down and increase the buyer’s ability to negotiate favorable terms. Conversely, if the buyer is dependent on a supplier (as in A), the buyer’s power diminishes.

“Buyer power increases when there are many suppliers and few buyers. The buyer has multiple options and can negotiate from a position of strength.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.3 - Relative Bargaining Power and Market Dynamics)

The supplier is using Rational persuasion by providing logical reasons, such as economic conditions and increased costs, to justify the price increase. This approach uses factual information to influence the buyer's decision, aiming to present the price hike as a reasonable adjustment, which aligns with CIPS strategies on influencing tactics in negotiations.

Becoming a preferred customer to supplier's perspective can increase the purchaser's leverage in negotiation. Beside the size of buying organisation or its spend, the following may be sufficient to differentiate the buyer from other buying organisations:

- Simple procurement processes

- Simple contracting processes

- Clear and concise documentation

- Absence of onerous supplier terms and conditions (onerous supplier terms and conditions mean that obligations imposed on suppliers are greater than their gains)

- On-time payment: The reduction in hassle for both supplier and the buyer, if bills are paid on time, is significant. From the customer’s perspective it could also be the opener to agreeing preferential payment terms. A supplier may weigh up that payment on time at 60 days is worth taking, over the current 30-day terms that slip to 90 days and beyond.

- Transparent processes

- Ethical behavior

LO 1, AC 1.3

As negotiations near closure, skilled negotiators carefully observe for buying signals—verbal cues (“That sounds reasonable…”) and non-verbal cues (nodding, smiling, leaning forward). These indicate readiness to agree and confirm whether it is the right time to close. At this stage, both sides usually stop gathering data or building rapport, as the focus is on confirming alignment and avoiding last-minute derailments. Closing too early may risk missing concessions, but delaying risks cooling momentum. Recognising buying signals ensures closure occurs at the optimal point, aligning with preparation and tactical awareness.

Using logic involves applying numerical data and factual evidence to support arguments in a negotiation. Logical reasoning appeals to objective analysis rather than emotional or coercive tactics and is effective in convincing the other party through structured, fact-based arguments, aligning with CIPS's guidance on logical negotiation techniques.

In the recovery phase, economies move out of recession: consumer spending rises, demand grows, and prices begin to stabilise or increase. Confidence improves, investment starts picking up, and spare capacity is gradually absorbed. Low confidence and falling investment are features of recession, while full capacity is linked to boom phases. For negotiators, recovery phases may mean suppliers regain confidence to raise prices, requiring careful market analysis.

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Win-lose approach is useful when the relationship with the other party (TOP) is short-term and once-off.

The question mentions 4 types of relationship:

Adversarial: Both seek to maximize position at the expense of the other. Almost no trust, communication and cooperation. These suppliers will probably provide non-core products or services with the buyer purchasing them on a one-off basis.

Outsourcing relationship: Use competent suppliers to manage non-core businesses previously done in-house. Require high level of trust and collaboration

Partnership: Both work closely on long term development by sharing information, technology and ideas.High level of trust with the aim to benefit both parties (win-win)

Strategic alliance: Both parties identify areas where they could collaborate to create mutual benefits

Among these 4 types of relationship, only adversarial is once-off. Then it is the correct answer.

An organisation's expense can be categorised into three groups:

Fixed Costs – costs that do not change with output.

Variable Costs – costs that vary in direct proportion to output.

Semi-variable costs – costs that are a combination of the above, with both a fixed and variable element.

Among the four options:

"Land rental paid in advance": This is fixed cost. The rental won't increase when the production increases.

"Additional pallet hires due to higher demand in year-end season": This can be identified as semi-variable cost (or step cost).

"Governments taxes": The taxes are often levied by a percentage of income or revenue. Therefore, it is variable

"Raw materials for next year production": This is obviously variable cost.

Rebuilding trust requires acknowledgement of the issue and supplier commitment to improvement. Cosmetic gestures such as hospitality or price reductions do not address the core problem. Nor should KPIs be artificially lowered, as this masks underperformance. Trust is restored when accountability is accepted and corrective actions are implemented transparently. This aligns with CIPS’ emphasis on trust-building behaviours: honesty, responsibility, and consistent performance.

The relationship spectrum categorizes supplier relationships based on factors like strategic importance, allowing organizations to tailor their approach to each supplier relationship. CIPS emphasizes the relationship spectrum as a valuable tool for assessing and managing supplier interactions based on strategic relevance.

In the scenario, the manager propose to 'split the difference', which means each party will accept some of their demands and concede some. This is known as 'Compromise'.

Competitive bidding is generally recommended for high-value or complex purchases where the cost and time required for the bidding process are justified. For low-value, routine items like pens, the time and resources required for competitive bidding may outweigh the potential cost savings, as noted in CIPS best practices. Hence, Option C is the best answer.

According toMendelow’s Matrix, stakeholders withhigh interest but low powershould be keptinformed. Their interest means they care about the negotiation's outcome, but their low power means they can't significantly influence it. Keeping them informed avoids alienation and ensures smoother implementation of negotiated agreements.

“Stakeholders with high interest but low power should be managed by keeping them informed. They may become powerful advocates or opponents in the future, so engaging them is a strategic approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Stakeholder Management in Commercial Negotiations)

Referent power is based on personal relationships and the respect or admiration one earns within an organization. Given Mike’s positive relationships and his rapport with team members and other departments, he is most likely to have referent power. This power type is influential in negotiation as people are more willing to work with someone they respect, as outlined in CIPS power dynamics in negotiation.

Buyer power gives customers/consumers (buyers) the ability to squeeze industry margins by pressuring firms (the suppliers) to reduce prices or increase the quality of services or products offered.

There are four major factors to consider when determining the bargaining power of buyers:

1. Number of buyers relative to suppliers: If the number of buyers is small relative to that of suppliers, the buyer’s power will be stronger.

2. Dependence of a buyer’s purchase on a particular supplier: If a buyer is able to get similar products/services from other suppliers, buyers depend less on a particular supplier. Therefore, the power of the buyer would be greater.

3. Switching costs: If there are not many alternative suppliers available, the cost of switching is high. Therefore, buyer power would be low.

4. Backward Integration: If the buyer is able to integrate or merge suppliers, the buyer has greater bargaining power over the existing suppliers.

When is Bargaining Power of Buyers High/Strong?

There are fewer buyers relative to that of suppliers

The switching costs of the buyer are low

If the buyer is able to backward integrate

The buyer purchases product in bulk (high volume)

The buyer is able to get similar product/services from other suppliers

The buyer purchases the majority of the seller’s products

Several substitutes are available on the market

Product is not differentiated

Both organisational and personal power have the ability to influence the outcomes of negotiation. Good negotiators recognises the different sources of relative personal power they possess in a negotiation. There is no one superior source of personal power; they will vary in their effectiveness based on the situation. The more personal sources available the better, even if some not used, these can be used as a fallback.

LO 1, AC 1.3

The pull approach relies on persuasion, interpersonal influence, and aligning proposals with others’ goals to secure commitment. It is not about forcing compliance (that is push). By engaging influencers and presenting a vision they can adopt, pull fosters buy-in and voluntary agreement. This method is particularly effective in collaborative negotiations where relationships and long-term trust are important.

Integrative negotiationfocuses onmutual gainand long-term collaboration. It seeks tomaximize joint outcomesand encourages parties to align interests andpursue shared goals. This contrasts with distributive tactics that prioritize individual wins and short-term gains.

“Integrative negotiations aim to create outcomes where both parties benefit. Shared problem-solving, information exchange, and joint goal pursuit are central features of this approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Principles of Integrative Negotiation)

Effective listening is crucial in integrative negotiations as it fosters mutual understanding and helps identify shared interests, leading to collaborative solutions. It enables negotiators to comprehend the other party's needs and concerns fully.

Integrative negotiation seeks joint value creation. Collaboration builds trust and open exchange, while problem solving identifies creative tradeables that satisfy both sides. Coercion and risk transfer belong to adversarial, distributive strategies, where one side gains at the expense of the other. Persuasion can play a role, but without collaboration, it leans toward manipulation rather than true win-win. In practice, integrative approaches require willingness to share data, listen actively, and seek long-term alignment.

Effective listeners demonstrate empathy and use paraphrasing to confirm understanding. These skills help build rapport, validate the speaker, and ensure accurate interpretation. Persuading and immediate solutions are active interventions, not listening behaviours. CIPS emphasises active listening as central to persuasion and relationship building in negotiation, enabling buyers to uncover underlying interests and respond appropriately.

Trust is the expectation that the other party will behave in a predictable and mutually acceptable way. In inter-firm relationships, the presence and absence of trust can affect the level of cost in a relationship. The existence of trust is taught to lower the transaction cost in a relationship. Dr. Mari Sako identified taxonomy of 3 types of trust in commercial relationship, which is very useful from the perspective of procurement.

Contractual trust: Trust based on the contract with TOP. This is potentially the weakest source of trust if there is nothing else to base the trust on, but it is the quickest to establish.

Competence trust: Trust based on TOP's professional qualifications or proven or certified technical capability or experience.

Goodwill trust: Trust based on knowing TOP has your interest at heart and will not behave opportunistically. This is potentially the strongest type of trust, but it takes the longest time to build.

In order to break vicious cycle of blame, procurement will need to use their negotiation and conflict management skills, adopting a collaborative and integrative approach. Your first action should be to establish the facts that led to the situation where the relationship broke down. Most day-to-day relationship between buying organisations and suppliers do not of course involve procurement staff, so you will need to consult with your business partners internally to establish their point of view of where the issue and sources of conflict are. You should also contact the supplier and get their side of the story - this is particularly to when you have previously identified the supplier as critical or otherwise important to your operations. Ideally you will be able to apply principled negotiation here, separating the people from the issue, focusing on interests and not positions, and then looking for options of mutual benefits.

Different questioning styles can be used to elicit desired responses:

Text Description automatically generated

The bargaining power of buyers increases when the buyer is large relative to the supplier. A large buyer can leverage its size to negotiate more favorable terms due to its significant impact on the supplier's business. CIPS notes that a buyer’s size and purchasing volume are key factors that enhance its negotiating power in buyer-supplier relationships.

Professor Gavin Kennedy highlights that we need to distinguish negotiation from other forms of decision-making by focusing on what is unique about it (the voluntary exchange) and not shared by other

techniques such as persuasion, gambling (e.g., coin tossing), command decision, instruction, litigation and coercion.

If driving greater value and efficiency from your supply base is your end, you should remember that there are many ways to do this without seeking to negotiate lower prices. Below are 7 types of saving levers:

Trust is built through consistent communication (e.g., regular meetings) and fulfilling commitments (keeping promises). Coercion erodes trust, while mediation is reactive and not a foundational element of trust-building.

In the MIL framework, “Must have” refers to non-negotiable elements. For Colin’s organisation,ethical and sustainable procurementis a core, uncompromisable value, making it a “Must have” in negotiations.

Direct costs are expenses that can be clearly attributed to the production of specific goods. These typically include raw materials, direct labor, and other costs tied directly to the manufacturing process. They are variable with production volume and help procurement teams analyze pricing more effectively during negotiations.

Consultation involves actively involving stakeholders or counterparties in decision-making. By seeking input, it fosters a sense of ownership, increasing commitment to negotiated outcomes. It is particularly effective when the negotiator has low positional power, as it shifts dynamics from authority to collaboration. Unlike coercion or compliance tactics, consultation builds engagement and long-term trust, which is critical in complex procurement where buy-in is essential for contract success. CIPS stresses its role in building influence where direct authority is limited.

Ray Carter coined the mnemonic STOPS WASTE to remind buyers of 10 cost-reduction ideas they can ask for themselves and their suppliers in any situation when considering a key purchase input. Stop Waste by:

Standardisation - is there a standard specification?

Transportation - is the inbound transport classification appropriate

Over-engineered - is the specification too tight?

Packaging - can packaging be reduced or eliminated?

Substitutes - is there a cheaper substitute material

Weight - is there opportunity to reduce weight of the product?

Any unnecessary processing - is there any unnecessary design or feature?

Supplier’s input - are suppliers able to assist with the cost reduction

To make - is it more economical to make or buy?

Eliminate - if no one uses the feature, can it be eliminated?

SAMOA is a useful acronym for checking and testing the information gathered from the Internet:

Source

Audience

Methodology

Objectivity

Accuracy

OWN-IT is acronym for 5 steps in the process of collecting and analysing the data and information needed in any field:

Outline

Wide search

Narrow search

Increase your stockpile of information

Transform your stockpile into new knowledge

A SMART goal is used to help guide goal setting. SMART is an acronym that stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bound.

To answer this question, you should know The seller's perspective as in 'How to Negotiate Professionally':

In the scenario, the buyer's spend is low, while they seem unattractive to seller (as they tend to pay late). So the buyer is classified as Nuisance in seller's perspective.

Closed questions are useful for verifying facts, as they prompt specific, concise responses. These questions allow the negotiator to confirm details without ambiguity, which is crucial for clarity in negotiation settings, as highlighted in CIPS’s guidelines on questioning techniques.

Fixed costs (FC) are costs that do not vary with volume. To an airline once aircraft are purchased, flight crews trained and departures scheduled, costs are disproportionately fixed.

Variable costs (VC) are those which vary with the amount produced. Fuel, catering services and marketing are examples of variable.

LO 2, AC 2.1

There are 5 key phases of negotiation:

The opening phase: confirm understanding and get the issue on the table

The testing phase: check assumption and confirm understanding

The proposing phase: asking 'if'

The bargaining phase: using tradeables

The agreement and closing phase

The testing could take the form of questions following a presentation by either side or questions on a tender or proposal document received by the buyer from the potential supplier. The testing phase is necessary to confirm that your approach and objectives are appropriate for the negotiation situation you now find yourself in. Careful listening, observation and interpretation of TOP's responses may give indication of the following:

Areas where TOP is willing and unwilling to make concessions

What factors or issues TOP places a high value on

If there are any non-commercial or emotional factors that may be pertinent

TOP's underlying interests - why they are taking the position they are.

Variable costs change in proportion to production volume, such as packaging, raw materials, and delivery. Fixed costs (rent, insurance, loan repayments) remain constant regardless of output. Recognising the difference is crucial when negotiating supplier pricing, as variable costs are often more open to tradeable adjustments (e.g., bulk discounts). Buyers who understand cost structures can challenge inflated fixed allocations or negotiate on genuine variable elements. This knowledge is vital in price breakdown discussions and in cost-modelling negotiations.

Integrative negotiation emphasises maximising joint outcomes and pursuing shared goals, moving beyond narrow self-interest. Unlike distributive negotiations, it does not focus on short-term wins or zero-sum positions. Instead, integrative strategies build sustainable value and strengthen partnerships. Maximising the other party’s outcome alone is more accommodative than integrative. Therefore, true integrative practice balances both parties’ interests for long-term gain.

Finding a middle ground, also known ascompromise or convergence, is a hallmark of collaborative or integrative negotiation. It allows both parties to secure partial wins, supports longer-term relationships, and promotes ongoing goodwill for future dealings.

“Negotiators must balance assertiveness with cooperation. Meeting halfway can lead to agreements that meet minimum needs of both parties while preserving the relationship.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Collaborative Approaches to Negotiation)

There are nine commonly used influence tactic:

1. Rational persuasion includes using facts, data, and logical arguments to try to convince others that your point of view is the best alternative. This is the most commonly applied influence tactic.

2. Legitimating

3. Personal appeals

4. Exchange

5. Ingratiation

6. Pressure refers to exerting undue influence on someone to do what you want or else something undesirable will occur.

7. Coalitions refer to a group of individuals working together toward a common goal to influence others.

8. Inspirational appeals

9. Consultation refers to the influence agent’s asking others for help in directly influencing or planning to influence another person or group.

In the scenario, there is a problem with demand forecasting and supply chain planning in Leitax. The new Supply chain director invites the stakeholders to a meeting to find the solution. She is using coalition tactics.

An adversarial style is appropriate when issues are non-negotiable, such as health and safety commitments (D). In these scenarios, compliance is required without compromise, and a firm stance may be necessary. This aligns with CIPS guidance, where adversarial tactics are used in non-negotiable contexts to enforce strict standards.

Direct costs are attributable to a specific project — in construction, this includes materials and on-site labour. Legal fees, insurance, and office space are indirect costs, as they support the business overall but are not tied to one project. For buyers, distinguishing direct from indirect costs ensures pricing transparency and helps challenge excessive overhead allocations. This knowledge strengthens cost breakdown negotiations in project contracts.

Afixed price agreementprovides the buyer withcost predictability. Once the price is agreed upon, the buyer is insulated from any cost increases on the supplier's side. The supplier bears the risk of fluctuating input prices, which simplifies cost control and contract administration for the buyer.

“With a fixed price arrangement, the buyer is protected from future price increases and does not need to monitor the supplier’s ongoing costs. This is particularly useful for budgeting and forecasting.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Fixed Price Agreements)

Bargaining is the negotiation stage where tradeables are typically introduced and discussed. During this phase, both parties exchange offers and concessions, using tradeables such as lead times and order quantities to find a mutually acceptable agreement. This aligns with CIPS's guidance on the stages of negotiation.

Jayden's use ofeye contact to demonstrate understandingis a core element ofactive and effective listening. This technique includes not only listening to spoken words but also using non-verbal cues (e.g., nodding, eye contact) to confirm comprehension and engagement. Effective listening is essential to ensure that both parties feel heard and respected, which can de-escalate tension and improve outcomes.

“Effective listening involves verbal and non-verbal behaviours that show attentiveness. Maintaining eye contact, nodding, and reflecting key points show engagement and help in building rapport and trust.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.3 - Communication Techniques in Negotiation)

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the monetary value of the goods and services manufactured or supplied in a financial period. In general terms, when the GDP rate falls or slows down, there will be a fall in demand for goods and services demanded in the economy, with a fall in firms' revenue and profit margins. When GDP is rising, there will be an increase in demand.

Consumer Price Index (CPI) is weighted measurement that evaluates the average cost of a basket of goods bought by a consumer.

Producer Price Index (PPI) is average changes in prices that a producer receives in return for its goods or services.

Small Business Lending Index (SBLI) is an indicator of small business lending trends.

Hypothetical questions are used to explore options or scenarios without making commitments. This technique allows negotiators to understand the other party’s preferences and limitations by presenting hypothetical situations, as recommended in CIPS guidelines for negotiation questioning techniques.

All one-to-one commercial negotiations between a specific purchaser and a specific supplier take place within an industrial market and a larger business environment characterised by multiple forces which both parties typically have little control over. STEEPLE framework highlights the 6 main external influences on a business:

LO 1, AC 1.3

Conflict can arise in procurement negotiations due to a power imbalance, which occurs when one party has more influence than the other, leading to potential exploitation or dissatisfaction. Differences in goals between parties—such as cost minimization for buyers and profit maximization for suppliers—also contribute to tension. Surprisingly, similar motives can lead to conflict as well, particularly when both parties are competing for limited benefits or market share.

Skilled negotiators seek to understand the needs of the other parties, as well as their own. In doing so, it allows them to determine a strategy that their own needs are met. Failing tounderstand the other party's needs is one of the most common reason for an unsuccessful negotiation. In the commercial negotiation, procurement team does not negotiate with organisation, they negotiate with individuals. It is therefore important to recognise that there are two levels of needs:

The organisation - What the organisation wants to achieve. This is generally well stated and understood

The individual - what is in it for the individual? This is generally not stated, rarely discussed, but very motivational. It is vitally important therefore that time is invested in understanding the needs of the individual

Skilled negotiators are aware of the needs that occur at both levels, and develop creative options and strategies that attempt to satisfy these needs.

Planning and preparation involve analysing bargaining power, understanding the counterpart’s needs, and defining the constituents (parties involved). Questioning and concessions come later during bargaining. Narrowing solutions occurs during closure. Proper planning ensures negotiators enter with clear objectives, strategies, and knowledge, reducing surprises. CIPS highlights preparation as the most critical determinant of negotiation success, aligning with the saying: “Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.”

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Commercial situations often demand a distributive bargaining approach, if the 'pie' is inherently of a fixed size. In this case, any conflicts must be resolved by sharing it.

In win-lose approach, a negotiator wants to maximise the value obtained in a single deal, the relationship with the other party is not important. Therefore, a strong party may win more than 50% of the metaphorical 'pie'.

It should not be assumed that win-win can be applied to all commercial negotiations, or that win-lose approaches are inherently inferior.

Packaging is considered a variable cost because it fluctuates with the level of production or sales activity. Variable costs change directly in relation to the volume of output or service. In contrast:

Rent (A), Loan repayments (B), and Insurance (C) are fixed costs, as they generally do not vary with production levels within a certain range. These are recurring costs that remain constant over time, aligning with CIPS's cost classification in procurement.

Trust-destroying behaviours:

- Rumours of partnership or relationship breaking down

- Emotion-based assessment of performance

- Avoiding accountability, passing the blame to others

- General mood – resentment, distrust, frustration, etc

LO 1, AC 1.4

There are many factors that can influence the balance of power in a negotiation. These factors are classified into 3 levels:

- Macro level: STEEPLE framework: social, technological, economic, environment, political, legal and ethical

- Micro level: Porter's five forces:

Diagram Description automatically generated

- One-to-one buyer-supplier dynamics.

The question asks about the micro factors that increases buyer's bargaining power. Among 5 answers, only 2 are likely to increase buyer's power:

- JCB's switching costs are low: Buyer may easily switch its suppliers anytime

- These components are highly standardised: The products are not different any more, buyer may choose to buy from any supplier available.

Other answers cannot be correct because:

- Suppliers are more concentrated than buyer: Suppliers are forming oligopoly market, their bargaining power tend to be greater.

- Eruption of epidemic in supply market: this is a macro factor. Eruption of epidemic may cause factories closed and disruptions on supply chain.

- Buyers purchase in small volumes: Buyer will be seen as less potential to suppliers. Buying organisation may have difficulties to deal better price with suppliers.

LO 1, AC 1.3

By removing the requirement for named personnel, CDL could allow the supplier flexibility in allocating equally competent but possibly less expensive staff. This tradeable does not compromise on quality but helps control costs.

Suppliers’ pricing decisions are influenced by both internal and external factors. Internal include cost of production, overheads, and lifecycle stage. External include competition (market dynamics, alternatives available) and customer perception of value (willingness to pay, brand image). These external elements are beyond supplier control but crucial in determining market price levels. Recognising these allows buyers to assess supplier pricing flexibility and to negotiate based on market realities rather than supplier cost claims.

Integrative negotiation focuses on collaboration, transparency, and the pursuit of shared benefits. It emphasizes mutual problem-solving and long-term value creation rather than short-term wins.

Essential goods and services such as electricity, fuel, basic food stuffs, commuter transport and habitual products such as tobacco, alcohol and sugar-based drinks are often sited as facing a relatively inelastic demand curve. This means when the price goes up, the quantity demanded does not decrease very much and so they are often the target of government taxation.

LO2, AC 2.2

Internal stakeholder support will be important not just at the initial negotiation of the contract, but potentially throughout the life of the contract right through to exit.

As a general rule, connected stakeholders (with the exception of suppliers) have a low level of influence on procurement negotiations.

Suppliers are connected stakeholders who have contractual relationships with the organisation.

Commercial negotiation objective should be driven by the business needs of the organisation, and not just the instinct of procurement.

Reflecting on performance should become a natural final step in the negotiation process.

'Celebrating publicly about the deal': Public gloating, even in success or failure, if it gets back to the supplier via the press or social media, will likely damage the relationship

'Tempting TOP to reopen the negotiation': whether TOP agrees to reopen the negotiation, procurement should reflect on their achievement and what can be improved.

'Asking TOP for another concession': TOP can agree or reject this concession. Eventually, reflecting should be the final step. Procurement can learn a lot from reflection on performance.

LO 3, AC 3.4

Dynamic pricing is the practice of dynamically calculating the price of a product or service in order to incorporate real-time market conditions, input costs, and/or competitive perspectives. Dynamic pricing which is based on marginal costing, is used by airlines and many other organisations.

Marginal cost is the cost of producing an additional unit of output. Marginal Costing is a costing technique wherein the marginal cost, i.e. variable cost is charged to units of cost, while the fixed cost for the period is completely written off against the contribution.

Direct costs are those directly attributable to the production of a unit — such as raw materials, components, and direct labour. Here, the metal used is a clear direct cost, as it varies with production output. Rent, insurance, and sales wages are indirect (overhead) costs, which must be allocated across products. Understanding this distinction is vital in negotiations, since direct costs are easier to challenge for efficiency gains, while indirect allocations may be arbitrary. Buyers with clear knowledge of cost breakdowns can negotiate more effectively, avoiding inflated pricing.

Integrative (win-win) negotiation looks for value-equivalent tradeables across the bargaining mix (price, service, warranty, aftercare, etc.). If the same total saving is achieved via aftercare—and the buyer needs it—accepting the tradeable meets objectives without forcing a distributive fight on unit price.

A business negotiation agenda is a formal agreed upon list of goals to be achieved or items to be discussed in a particular order during a meeting or negotiation. Agendas can be formal and obvious, or informal and subtle in negotiations.

The agenda is one of the main structural elements of negotiation, in addition to such questions as site, identification of participants, and elements of timing. Together, they answer the who, what, when, and where questions. As with other aspects of negotiation, the agenda can be used either manipulatively to enhance leverage or to improve the prospects for agreement and the possibilities for mutual gain. In most cases, it will be used both ways, reflecting the nature of negotiation as a “mixed-motive” situation.

Although it can be instrumental to [research] volunteer as a sole source to write the agenda, in most cases it becomes a joint activity to construct a consensual basis for subsequent negotiation. In these situations, agenda-building becomes one of the pre-negotiation activities that set the tone for the relationship (Saunders, 1985). In other situations, the parties may engage in actual negotiation without a formal or written agenda. When this occurs, the risks and uncertainties may be high but the party who appreciates the importance of the informal agenda has a tremendous advantage.

Whether one plans it or not, during the course of negotiation the parties will discuss a finite set of issues in some sequence and from a particular perceptual framework. Consciousness of the universality and centrality of the agenda is prerequisite to guiding negotiation to a successful conclusion.

CIPS stresses that clear verbal confirmation is required for agreements. Non-verbal signals (smiles, nods, handshakes) can indicate politeness or ambiguity but do not constitute binding agreement. Assuming agreement risks later disputes or misunderstandings. Skilled negotiators ensure closure by explicitly summarising agreed terms and documenting them. Non-verbal communication is supportive, not decisive, in contract negotiation contexts.

Monopolies exist in many markets in real life for very different reasons:

Ownership of a Key Resource: When one company exerts sole control over a resource that is necessary for the production of a specific product, the market may become a monopoly. For example, the only medication deemed acceptable to treat a disease comes from a particular ingredient X, and knowledge of this ingredient X is owned by a single family owned company. The company can, therefore, be said to have a monopoly over ingredient X that is needed to cure the disease because it is the only company that can produce a product deemed acceptable.

Government Franchise: In certain instances, a monopoly may be explicitly created by the government if it grants a single company, whether private or government-owned, the right to conduct business in a particular market. For example, when a national railways transportation service is created by the government, in most cases they are granted a monopoly on the operation of passenger trains in the country. As a result, other firms are only able to offer passenger train services with the cooperation and/or permission of the government-owned provider.

Intellectual Property Protection: Extending intellectual property protection to a company in the form of patents and copyrights is yet another way in which monopolies are created. When a government does this, it is in fact giving a single company an exclusive right to provide a particular product / service to the market. Patents and copyrights work in providing owners of intellectual property with the right to act as an exclusive provider of a new product for a specific length of time. This creates a temporary monopoly in the market with regards to new products and services.

Natural Monopoly: A market may also become a monopoly simply because it may be more cost-effective for one company to serve the whole market than to have several smaller firms in competition with one another. A company with virtually unlimited economies of scale is referred to as a natural monopoly. Such firms become monopolies due to their position and size, which makes it impossible for new entrants in the market to compete price-wise. Natural monopolies are common in industries with high fixed costs and low marginal costs of operation such as providers of television, telephone, and internet services.

In this question, 'A single firm is very large' is not enough to tell whether this market is monopolistic.

Conflicts arise in procurement when risks, costs, or gains are not fairly shared, creating perceptions of exploitation. Another frequent source is late payment of supplier invoices, which damages trust and supplier cash flow. Scheduling or early involvement, by contrast, usually supports collaboration unless poorly managed. Conflict is natural in negotiations due to divergent interests, but recognising sources allows proactive management. Skilled negotiators use integrative approaches to turn potential conflict into opportunity, aligning incentives and ensuring fairness.

Trust is the expectation that the other party will behave in a predictable and mutually acceptable way. In inter-firm relationships, the presence and absence of trust can affect the level of cost in a relationship. The existence of trust is taught to lower the transaction cost in a relationship. Dr. Mari Sako identified taxonomy of 3 types of trust in commercial relationship, which is very useful from the perspective of procurement.

Contractual trust: Trust based on the contract with TOP. This is potentially the weakest source of trust if there is nothing else to base the trust on, but it is the quickest to establish.

Competence trust: Trust based on TOP's professional qualifications or proven or certified technical capability or experience.

Goodwill trust: Trust based on knowing TOP has your interest at heart and will not behave opportunistically. This is potentially the strongest type of trust, but it takes the longest time to build.

Otherwise, trust also has legal meaning. A trust is a legal document that can be created during a person's lifetime and survive the person's death. A trust can also be created by a will and formed after death. Charitable trusts are trusts which benefit a particular charity or the public in general.

Negotiation variables such as price or contract length, etc are that can be traded with TOP in a negotiation. The more variables you can identify, the better. The more variables you can identify and articulate, the lower the chances of the negotiation reaching deadlock as more possibilities are facilitated regarding more creative solutions.

Below are examples of negotiation tradeables in buying professional services:

LO 2, AC 2.3

Junior team members can play supportive roles in negotiations, such as taking notes and observing the proceedings. These roles allow them to learn and contribute without leading the negotiation. Serving as an expert or chair would typically require more experience and authority.

According to Thomas-Kilmann conflict model instrument, there are 5 conflict management styles:

In this scenario, the buyer's bargaining power is stronger than suppliers', and the relationship is transactional. Therefore, to get the most preferable outcome, the procurement professional can take an assertive approach, while he doesn't need to co-operate closely with these suppliers. Competing will be the most appropriate approach to negotiation in this scenario so that the buying organisation can get a better deal.

In difficult negotiations and disputes, hardball tactics like punishment and threats often seem like the only way to win concessions. Some negotiators seem to believe that hardball tactics are the key to success in any negotiation. They resort to extreme demands and even unethical behaviour to try to get the upper hand in a negotiation.

The following are 8 typical hardball tactics:

1. Good cop / Bad cop

2. Low ball / High ball

3. Bogey

4. The Nibble

5. Chicken

6. Intimidation

7. Aggressive Behaviour

8. Snow Job

You can read the details of each tactic here.

In the contrary to hardball tactics, negotiators can adopt integrative approach to the negotiation. Some of integrative tactics are:

1. Expand the Pie

2. Bridging

3. Post Settlement –Settlement

Et cetera

Procurement can negotiate various aspects of a purchase requisition even without a formal value analysis. While value analysis can enhance cost-effectiveness, procurement professionals often negotiate on pricing, terms, and conditions to add value independently of value analysis, as per CIPS’s guidelines on procurement flexibility in negotiations.

Trust may create value as following:

LO 1, AC 1.4

Negotiation doesn't end after the contract is awarded. The needs for negotiation can arise in any post-award stages. For example, at supplier development and relationship management stage,improvement in supplier capability, capacity, and product/service range can be negotiated. Negotiations with long-term strategic critical suppliers should be carried out in a partnering style, with a win-win starting point assumed.

In some sectors such as transport, utilities and infrastructure, tenderers may 'bid low' or even make a loss to win major contracts with a view to negotiating lucrative changes, variations and 'add-ons' over the life of the contract when the supplier is bedded in and the buyer is in the weaker position to push back or challenge. Even in less complex contract, it is very likely that there will be a need to negotiate with that supplier again after the awarding of the contract.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Supplier bargaining power is stronger when there arefew suppliers,low volume requirementsfrom buyers, and when suppliers possessunique capabilities or technology(like specialized machinery). These conditions reduce buyer leverage and increase supplier influence.

The objective of the buyer here is to improve supplier cost structures over time, which requires them to have insight into supplier's current cost information. Purchase price cost analysis (PPCA) can help here. PPCA is a method for gathering, analysing and using price and cost information in a systematic way. The process allows the identification of future savings and opportunities to improve current costs.

STEEPLE analysis is used to analyse the macro environment that may have impact on an organisation.

Competitive rivalry is a part of Porter's Five Forces which is a tool for strategy making.

Volume concentration is a way to increase the purchasing quantities in order for a buying organisation to improve its leverage in negotiation.

Ground rules are the basic rules for doing something (Cambridge Dictionary). A negotiation goes more smoothly if ground rules are adopted. Then if something goes awry at a later time, you can point out the ground rule that has been violated. Procurement professional should seek to minimise conflict over process through agreeing 'ground rules' and approach as far as possible with the other party in advance of any negotiation meetings.

There should be two sets of ground rules: 1) ground rules for the negotiations between the two parties and 2) ground rules for the negotiating team itself. This article is about the negotiating team ground rules.

The rule of law is the condition in which all members of society, including its political leaders, accept the authority of the law.

Ground zero describes the point on the Earth's surface closest to a nuclear detonation. In the case of an explosion above the ground, ground zero refers to the point on the ground directly below the nuclear detonation.

The Ground Beam is the beam which is provided usually at the foundation level to support building walls, joists, etc.

Buying organisation may increase its leverage with suppliers by concentrating spend. Supplier spend consolidation can take many forms as outlined below:

- Vendor base reduction: straightforward reduction of number of suppliers in any category

- Volume pooling: pooling cross organisational requirement until your order volume is high enough to attract new bidders/additional discounts

- Volume redistribution: making recommendations following spend analysis to move from one supplier to another

- Volume consolidation across categories: certain purchase requirements may be common across a number of categories. In the scenario, XYZ has combined different categories but closely related to office services into a larger contract so that they can increase their leverage.

- Standardisation and harmonisation of specifications: analysis of specifications and standards for a high spend purchased input, may show that there is a little difference between them and that the specification can be standardised or at least harmonised across the group or across national, regional or global operations.

- Forming purchasing consortia: buyers may decide to come together and combine their purchase volumes to attract better deals.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative. When collaborating, an individual attempts to work with the other person to find a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of both. It involves digging into an issue to identify the underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find an alternative that meets both sets of concerns. Collaborating between two persons might take the form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each other’s insights, resolving some conditionthat would otherwise have them competing for resources, or confronting and trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem.

Mark-up % = Profit ÷ Cost × 100. Here, profit is $80, cost is $160. So, (80 ÷ 160) × 100 = 50%. This differs from margin, which is profit ÷ selling price. Mark-up analysis helps buyers understand supplier pricing structures, detect hidden margins, and strengthen negotiation. By knowing whether a supplier is working with high or low mark-up levels, buyers can challenge prices more effectively or justify alternative offers. This analytical preparation supports objective negotiation rather than reliance on supplier claims.

During the proposing stage, parties move toward agreement by narrowing down a wide range of potential options. This helps focus the negotiation and aligns both parties toward practical, mutual outcomes. It's an essential step to keep the process structured and productive.

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA) is the plan B or back-up plan in the event of a ‘walk away’. In case of no deal, buyer (or supplier) may switch to this option.

The zone of potential agreement (ZOPA) is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

STEEPLE offers an overview of various external fields. It is an acronym for Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal and Ethical.

PESTLE is a mnemonic which in its expanded form denotes P for Political, E for Economic, S for Social, T for Technological, L for Legal and E for Environmental. It gives a bird’s eye view of the whole environment from many different angles that one wants to check and keep a track of while contemplating on a certain idea/plan.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Closed questions (requiring yes/no or factual answers) are best for verifying facts, ensuring clarity and accuracy. Open questions are useful for exploration, while hypothetical test possibilities, and leading steer responses. In negotiation, closed questions confirm details such as prices, quantities, or deadlines, preventing ambiguity in agreements. CIPS stresses using the full range of question types strategically, with closed questions essential in finalising commitments.

When facing a monopoly supplier, buyers must find creative ways to introduce leverage. Publicly exploring alternative solutions can create the perception of competition or a fallback plan, thus shifting bargaining power slightly toward the buyer.

The typical stages of commercial negotiation are Preparing, opening, bargaining, agreement, and closure. This sequence facilitates a structured approach where negotiators prepare strategies, initiate discussions, engage in bargaining, reach agreements, and formally close the negotiation. This structure is emphasized in CIPS materials as essential for achieving a balanced negotiation process.

Legitimate poweris derived from theposition or authorityheld within the organisation. It supports the buyer’s ability to influence negotiation outcomes based on formal responsibility, legal rights, or contractual mandates.

“Legitimate power stems from formal roles, authority or responsibility. It enables negotiators to assert terms backed by organisational policy or legal mandate.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.1 - Organisational Power Structures in Negotiation)

Fixed price contract is the contract in which the price is static throughout the contract period. A fixed-price contract may give certainty to budget and simplify contract management. However, it may lead to other problems since it requires bidders to estimate and bear the financial risks associated with price escalations. If the estimates are too high or events do not materialize, the buyer will pay a steep price that may affect the economy and efficiency of the contract. In the worst case, it may mean that the bid price is then above budget and may lead to a reduction in the requirements or rebidding. If the estimates are too low, it may appear as an abnormally low bid and disrupt contract execution.

On the other hand, price adjustment provisions include formulas designed to address problems, and can protect both the borrower and contractors from price fluctuations. Price adjustment formulas allow contractors to offer more realistic prices at the time of bidding. Despite concerns that they may lead to budget uncertainties, price adjustment formulas will estimate the actual cost implications that will be encountered. They use indexes that can be used for cost projection.

According to Asia Development Bank (ADB), any contract with a delivery or completion period beyond 18 months should contain an appropriate price adjustment clause.

In the scenario, the crude oil contract is planned to last 36 months. This period is pretty long with a fluctuating commodity. Therefore, the company should use price adjustment agreement.

A negotiation performance review should focus on measuring outcomes against objectives, lessons learned, and evaluation of negotiator effectiveness. This ensures continual improvement and supports organisational learning. Pricing structures and alternative suppliers may have been reviewed earlier, but are not part of post-performance reflection. Travel expenses are irrelevant to negotiation learning. By focusing on objectives, learning, and performance, organisations embed best practice and prepare stronger strategies for future negotiations.

In 1983, Peter Kraljic devised a means to segment the supplier base in the article in HBR. In this, he argued that supply items should be mapped against two key dimensions: risk and profitability.

Risk relates to the likelihood for an unexpected event in the supply chains to disrupt operations. For instance, in important areas of spend, such as tire suppliers for an automotive are business critical, and should a disruption occur, the auto company is likely itself to face substantial problems.

Profitability describes the impact of a supply item upon the bottom line. For certain areas of spend, such as stationery, supplies have only a negligible effect on profits. In other categories, a single source of supply can make or break a business.

Putting these two dimensions together yields a classic two-by-two matrix.

Source: Peter Kraljic, HBR