CIPS L4M5 Commercial Negotiation Exam Practice Test

Accepting gifts during a negotiation can createconflict of interestconcerns and may violate ethical standards. Best practice requires rejecting such offers to maintain transparency and objectivity in decision-making.

Professional buyers, when planning or engaging in negotiation with suppliers, should always be aware of where the intended and actual relationship with this supplier is positioned on the 'spectrum' or 'continuum' of commercial relationships. The relationship spectrum describes the range of commercial relationships between a buyer and supplier based on richness of communication, longevity and mutual dependence.

Timeline Description automatically generated

In the question, the contract is simple one-off (or spot buy), which means the relationship will likely to be more transactional. In such relationship, price is the most important criteria and buyer may adopt arm's-length approach.

An adversarial negotiation style is more suitable in a market with many alternative sources and substitutes (B). When there are multiple suppliers, buyers have the upper hand and can adopt a competitive stance without risking supply continuity. This aligns with CIPS guidance on the use of adversarial styles in competitive markets with numerous alternatives.

CIPS describes a relationship spectrum from arm’s-length/transactional through collaborative/partnership, matched to spend criticality, risk, and strategic importance; analysis helps select the appropriate relationship style before and during negotiation.

Conflicts arise in procurement when risks, costs, or gains are not fairly shared, creating perceptions of exploitation. Another frequent source is late payment of supplier invoices, which damages trust and supplier cash flow. Scheduling or early involvement, by contrast, usually supports collaboration unless poorly managed. Conflict is natural in negotiations due to divergent interests, but recognising sources allows proactive management. Skilled negotiators use integrative approaches to turn potential conflict into opportunity, aligning incentives and ensuring fairness.

Mark-up and margin allow supplier to make gross profit. Remember that every supplier operates under different cost structures and some are set up to be most profitable at a particular level of volume, so it is dangerous to assume all suppliers can survive on a lower margin if their volume increases. Intelligent buyers understand that mark-up and margin may define gross profits, but they tell you very little about a supplier's net profits.

LO 2, AC 2.1

A collaborative negotiation approach is explicitly designed to achieve win–win outcomes, where both parties work together to maximise joint value. This approach is closely associated with integrative negotiation, emphasising trust, information sharing, and joint problem-solving. Distributive and adversarial approaches are win–lose, focusing on dividing value rather than creating it. “Collective” is not a recognised CIPS negotiation approach. Collaborative negotiation is particularly suitable where long-term relationships, shared objectives, or strategic partnerships are important.

Direct costs are attributable to a specific project — in construction, this includes materials and on-site labour. Legal fees, insurance, and office space are indirect costs, as they support the business overall but are not tied to one project. For buyers, distinguishing direct from indirect costs ensures pricing transparency and helps challenge excessive overhead allocations. This knowledge strengthens cost breakdown negotiations in project contracts.

Knowing supplier's fixed and variable costs is beneficial for the buyer in a negotiation. With these insights, the buyer would know the volume at which the supplier reaches break-even points and then offers significant discount due to economies of scale.

An adversarial negotiation style is appropriate when one party has high bargaining power and is focused on maximizing its benefit rather than maintaining a long-term relationship. This approach often involves competitive tactics that leverage power disparities, aligning with CIPS guidance on when adversarial tactics may be strategically used in negotiations.

A shift in demand occurs when an influencing factor other than price changes. Those factors are:

- The income of buyers

- The tastes and preferences of buyers

- The prices of other goods and services, especially substitutes and complements

- Expectations of buyer about the future

In this question:

- 'Prices of complementary goods decrease' will lead to quantity demanded for that complements rising, then demand for consumer good will increase accordingly.

- 'Price of the consumer good decreases' will increase the quantity demanded for that good, but it will not shift the demand curve

- 'Customers' expectation of higher prices in the future': in this scenario, customers tend to buy more to store in present, which leads to demand curve shifting to the right

- 'Consumer tastes shift toward substitute products': Demand for substitutes will rise, so demand for that consumer good will decrease and the demand curve shifts to the left.

LO 2, AC 2.2

At the proposing phase either side may start making tentative proposals regarding their offering. In the case of negotiation where TOP has already submitted a tender or proposal, this stage may provide an opportunity for them to make proposals to improve on their initial offers in general or in areas highlighted by the buying side in advance.

The word 'if' is very useful at this stage and allows you to test tentative proposals without committing yourself. Skilled negotiators use language very carefully. The questions with 'if' are hypothetical ones.

LO 3, AC 3.1

In a globalised commercial world characterised by dynamic market and multiple companies competing for business, a positive corporate reputation can be an enormous asset. Reputational strength in one organisation might be based on some or all of the following characteristics:

- Quality of products or services

- Low cost/high value for money

- High ethical standards

- Reliability

- Cutting-edge technology

- Strong customer focus

- Engineering excellence

LO 1, AC 1.4

The question asks about the point in time when Jane should make concessions with the supplier. These concessions should be traded after preliminary stages such as opening, testing and proposing are over and proposals move from being tentative and general to being more definite and specific. This stage is called bargaining phase. The bargaining phase is the 'meat' of the negotiation meeting.

LO 3, AC 3.1

Referent power is based on personal relationships and the respect or admiration one earns within an organization. Given Mike’s positive relationships and his rapport with team members and other departments, he is most likely to have referent power. This power type is influential in negotiation as people are more willing to work with someone they respect, as outlined in CIPS power dynamics in negotiation.

Hypothetical questionsare used to explore scenarios or options without making a commitment. For example, asking "What if we were to increase the order volume?" encourages creative thinking and testing potential agreements without binding either party. This technique is valuable in theproposing and bargaining stagesof negotiation to explore trade-offs and build mutual solutions.

Commercial negotiations involve a wider set of stakeholders than procurement, budget holders, and users. Depending on context, directors, IT specialists, legal teams, regulators, or external partners may all be impacted. Ignoring them risks resistance or missed requirements. CIPS stresses stakeholder mapping tools (such as Mendelow’s Matrix) to identify influence and interest levels, ensuring all relevant parties are managed appropriately in negotiation preparation and execution. Narrow stakeholder identification can undermine outcomes.

A useful and simple shorthand for preferred negotiation styles is summarised by four simple descriptor: 'warm', 'tough', 'logical' and 'dealer', which can be applied to describe individuals' dominant preferred style in most circumstances.

Warm - a people person

Tough - a hard-nosed negotiator

Logic - a numbers person

Dealer - a trader who loves bargaining

Strengths, weaknesses of logical style are described below:

Table Description automatically generated

The question asks about negotiation techniques which are not present in the book. In this question, there are only 3 recognised techniques:

- Framing and reframing: A frame is an assumption, or set of assumptions, that guides our attention and behavior. Reframing is the ability to identify and significantly change assumptions or perspectives. Framing has a significant impact on the effectiveness of negotiation outcomes and negotiator working relationships. You can read more on framing and reframing here.

- Anchoring: Anchoring bias is well-known cognitive bias in negotiation and in other contexts. The anchoring bias describes the common tendency to give too much weight to the first number put forth in a discussion and then inadequately adjust from that starting point, or the “anchor.” We even fixate on anchors when we know they are irrelevant to the discussion at hand. You can read more on anchoring here.

- Pacing and leading: Pacing and leading is a two-step lever of persuasion. First – You “match your pace” to the person you want to influence in as many ways as possible. You can do this by mimicking the way the person talks, stands, their appearance, etc. You can also mimic less tangible aspects like the way they act, or their emotional state. Second – Once you’ve set your pace with someone, lead them to whatever decision or behavior you want them to take! You can read more on pacing and leading here.

In order to identify opportunities where you can increase your leverage with supplier, you need to understand your spend. Undertaking spend analysis of your accounts payable (AP) data is an essential first step here.

Closed questions are effective for concluding negotiations, as they often elicit straightforward yes-or-no responses, helping to finalize terms and confirm agreement on specific points. This approach facilitates a clear and concise close to discussions, ensuring that both parties confirm their commitment to the agreed terms, as recommended by CIPS negotiation strategies.

In the scenario, anyone who has concerns can join a meeting to raise their thoughts. The project team takes the stakeholders' ideas into account. This is known as coalition: A group of people or organisations come together and work collaboratively to achieve some goals. Specifically in this scenario, the goal is creating a high-quality and unified specification for an important project.

Legitimate poweris derived from theposition or authorityheld within the organisation. It supports the buyer’s ability to influence negotiation outcomes based on formal responsibility, legal rights, or contractual mandates.

“Legitimate power stems from formal roles, authority or responsibility. It enables negotiators to assert terms backed by organisational policy or legal mandate.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.1 - Organisational Power Structures in Negotiation)

According to Paul Steele's 'The Seller's Perspective', customer can be classified into 4 categories as below:

In this scenario, although SBL's spend claims large portion in suppliers' revenues, their draconian treatment will reduce SBL's attractiveness in supplier's perspective. SBL falls into Exploit quadrant. With exploitable customers, suppliers tend to 'milk' the customer and charge a high price to compensate for all the pain customer put on them.

A junior team member can effectively contribute as a note taker (1) and observer (3), allowing them to support the meeting without taking on roles that require more experience, like chairing or serving as an expert. This aligns with CIPS’s recommendations for assigning junior roles in negotiations.

In difficult negotiations and disputes, hardball tactics like punishment and threats often seem like the only way to win concessions. Some negotiators seem to believe that hardball tactics are the key to success in any negotiation. They resort to extreme demands and even unethical behaviour to try to get the upper hand in a negotiation.

The following are 8 typical hardball tactics:

1. Good cop / Bad cop

2. Low ball / High ball

3. Bogey

4. The Nibble

5. Chicken

6. Intimidation

7. Aggressive Behaviour

8. Snow Job

You can read the details of each tactic here.

In the contrary to hardball tactics, negotiators can adopt integrative approach to the negotiation. Some of integrative tactics are:

1. Expand the Pie

2. Bridging

3. Post Settlement –Settlement

Et cetera

Closed questions (requiring yes/no or factual answers) are best for verifying facts, ensuring clarity and accuracy. Open questions are useful for exploration, while hypothetical test possibilities, and leading steer responses. In negotiation, closed questions confirm details such as prices, quantities, or deadlines, preventing ambiguity in agreements. CIPS stresses using the full range of question types strategically, with closed questions essential in finalising commitments.

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are 5 options in this question:

'Threat of punishment, costs and damage': The influencer tries to 'push' the other party to act as he/she wants by using force. This method is effective but short-lived. The influencer also risks to developing reputation for being heavy handed and dictatorial.

'Argument based on information, logic and reason': The influencer uses logic and reasons to persuade the other party. This is also known as 'Persuasive Reasoning' (Push)

'Using language and imagery to ‘paint a picture others can see’': The influencer seeks to influence another by understanding the other's emotions, and stimulating that party's imagination to visualise the desired future goal of the influencer. This is also known as 'visionary (pull)'

'Working together to define the problem, the goals and the best solution': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another involves the other party in the decision making process. This is known as 'collaborative (pull)'

'Listening to, involving and supporting others': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another tries to discover the other party's emotion and aims at mutual understanding. This is also a collaborative approach.

A collaborative relationship is characterized by mutual commitment, which enhances risk management and strategic planning between buyer and supplier. High levels of trust and commitment enable both parties to work closely to achieve shared objectives, creating a beneficial negotiation environment. This approach aligns with CIPS’s principles of collaborative procurement relationships.

The effect of a change of relative exchange rates will be determined by which currency you pay your supplier in.

Table Description automatically generated

LO 2, AC 2.2

A supply curve will slope upward from left to right showing more supply at higher prices, as illustrated in the graph below:

A movement along the supply curve will be brought about by a change in price, but a shift of the whole curve will be caused by a determinant other than price:

- The physical feasibility and time and energy required to produce the products

- Technology and innovation

- The objectives of the producers and their future expectations

- Prices of other goods and services

- Government's policies

LO 2, AC 2.2

This statement reflects shared goals and mutual benefit, hallmarks of integrative negotiation. Unlike adversarial or distributive (win-lose) strategies, integrative approaches seek joint value and collaboration. The language of partnership (“we are in this together”) signals alignment and cooperative intent. Lose-lose outcomes, by contrast, occur when both sides compromise excessively or fail to reach creative solutions. Integrative strategies foster long-term partnerships where value is maximised for both.

A useful model of personal power that has survived the test of time and provide a simple way to analyse negotiation in French and Raven's Power Base Model, which describes six bases of power:

In the scenario, the length of payment period is particularly important to the supplier as they are investing new facilities. Otherwise, the buyer's company has a positive cash flow position and budget is available for a shorter payment terms. So this tradeable (payment period) is important to supplier but it is not a significant problem with the buyer. This tradeable will fall within 'Easy concession to trade' quadrant in the following matrix:

Table Description automatically generated

If the tradeable fall within this quadrant, Sally should shorten the payment period in supplier's favour and try to win as many concessions as possible in return. Asking for a discount may be a reasonable trade-off.

LO 2, AC 2.3

In 1983, Peter Kraljic devised a means to segment the supplier base in the article in HBR. In this, he argued that supply items should be mapped against two key dimensions: risk and profitability.

Risk relates to the likelihood for an unexpected event in the supply chains to disrupt operations. For instance, in important areas of spend, such as tire suppliers for an automotive are business critical, and should a disruption occur, the auto company is likely itself to face substantial problems.

Profitability describes the impact of a supply item upon the bottom line. For certain areas of spend, such as stationery, supplies have only a negligible effect on profits. In other categories, a single source of supply can make or break a business.

Putting these two dimensions together yields a classic two-by-two matrix.

Source: Peter Kraljic, HBR

In some markets, suppliers experience peaks and troughs in demand and so buyers can increase their leverage through developing an understanding of how busy their vendor are at particular time during the year or business cycle and targetting at quieter period. Similarly, if a buyer can develop an understanding of supplier capacity and to what extent have they covered their fixed cost, they may be able to target suppliers when their average costs are likely to be lowest. Vendor's average costs will be higher at low and high capacity utilisation.

A picture containing graphical user interface Description automatically generated

In the MIL framework, “Must have” refers to non-negotiable elements. For Colin’s organisation,ethical and sustainable procurementis a core, uncompromisable value, making it a “Must have” in negotiations.

While face-to-face meetings are beneficial, declining all other forms of interaction can hinder progress. Telephone calls can be effective in early negotiation stages to build rapport and set expectations. Conditioning the client through initial calls is a common and productive practice.

Packaging is considered a variable cost because it fluctuates with the level of production or sales activity. Variable costs change directly in relation to the volume of output or service. In contrast:

Rent (A), Loan repayments (B), and Insurance (C) are fixed costs, as they generally do not vary with production levels within a certain range. These are recurring costs that remain constant over time, aligning with CIPS's cost classification in procurement.

The ZOPA defines the range of outcomes acceptable to both parties, while the walk-away point defines the minimum acceptable deal for the buyer. Together, these guide negotiation planning to avoid unfavourable agreements. Attendee lists and venues are logistical details, important but not central to negotiation value creation. Preparation of ZOPA and walk-away ensures structured, strategic decision-making and protects against poor deals.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Integrative, interest-based negotiation can facilitate constructive, positive relationship and establish contracts between parties on a foundation of goodwill. It is important to note it can only facilitate these positive outcomes, it does not guarantee that the other party will not seek to be opportunistic at a later time during the life of the contract. Previous knowledge of the behaviours of the other party regarding honouring contractual and other commitments will be useful here in predicting long-term outcomes, not ensuring that they will not leverage their advantages.

Delivering on commitments is fundamental to building high-trust relationships. When an organization reliably fulfills its promises, it reinforces the supplier’s confidence in the partnership, fostering long-term collaboration. While contract management and audits are supportive processes, delivering on commitments directly strengthens trust, as emphasized in CIPS best practices for relationship management.

Reflecting on performance should become a natural final step in the negotiation process.

'Celebrating publicly about the deal': Public gloating, even in success or failure, if it gets back to the supplier via the press or social media, will likely damage the relationship

'Tempting TOP to reopen the negotiation': whether TOP agrees to reopen the negotiation, procurement should reflect on their achievement and what can be improved.

'Asking TOP for another concession': TOP can agree or reject this concession. Eventually, reflecting should be the final step. Procurement can learn a lot from reflection on performance.

LO 3, AC 3.4

Mark-up is defined as profit expressed as a percentage of the cost. It calculates the profit margin based on the cost price rather than the selling price, which allows companies to determine how much they are earning over their production or purchase costs. This aligns with standard accounting and CIPS definitions of mark-up in procurement contexts.

Persistent late payment of the supplier’s invoices (A) and Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs with the supplier (B) are potential sources of conflict as they create dissatisfaction and imbalance in the relationship. According to CIPS materials:

Late payments (A) can strain the supplier’s cash flow, affecting their operational stability and leading to mistrust in the buyer.

Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs (B) can result in one party feeling exploited or unfairly treated, which undermines the collaborative spirit essential for long-term partnerships.

In contrast, requesting early supplier involvement, planning visits, or setting delivery dates are typically part of constructive relationship management practices and do not inherently lead to conflict.

The correct answer is Bargaining mix. The bargaining mix refers to the full range of variables that can be negotiated, such as price, delivery schedules, payment terms, volumes, warranties, contract length, or service levels. According to CIPS guidance, effective negotiators identify elements that are of low value to themselves but high value to the other party, as these can be traded to gain concessions on priority issues like price. This approach supports value creation rather than positional bargaining and is central to both distributive and integrative negotiation preparation. The PM’s focus is therefore not on objections, opening statements, or closing techniques, but on structuring tradeables in advance to enable flexible and constructive bargaining.

To answer this question, you should know The seller's perspective as in 'How to Negotiate Professionally':

In the scenario, the buyer's spend is low, while they seem unattractive to seller (as they tend to pay late). So the buyer is classified as Nuisance in seller's perspective.

Understanding where and with whom your supplier spends their money, or understanding the 'cost breakdowns' or 'price build-up' of the goods and services you purchase from the supplier, will help you know

where and when they can offer price concessions.

Cost information can be expressed with more impact through graphs that can be created using Excel and PowerPoint or other softwares. There are two commonly used models known as 'spend waterfall'

and 'spend tree'. Spend waterfall shows the build-up of costs, while the spend tree shows all the spends that an organisation makes.

There is no graph known as 'spend candlesticks'. Candlestick chart is a style of financial chart used to describe price movements of a security, derivative, or currency.

The aggregate expenditure model is a method of calculating GDP. The aggregate expenditure model focuses on the relationships between production (GDP) and planned spending: GDP = planned

spending = consumption + investment + government purchases + net exports.

Contribution = Price - Variable cost

Break-even point (volume) = Fixed cost/Contribution

Different questioning styles can be used to elicit desired responses:

Text Description automatically generated

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA) is the plan B or back-up plan in the event of a ‘walk away’. In case of no deal, buyer (or supplier) may switch to this option.

The zone of potential agreement (ZOPA) is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

STEEPLE offers an overview of various external fields. It is an acronym for Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal and Ethical.

PESTLE is a mnemonic which in its expanded form denotes P for Political, E for Economic, S for Social, T for Technological, L for Legal and E for Environmental. It gives a bird’s eye view of the whole environment from many different angles that one wants to check and keep a track of while contemplating on a certain idea/plan.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Fixed costs are regular, predictable charges that do not vary directly with usage or demand. Monthly cleaning services are typically charged at a fixed, recurring rate, making them a clear example of a fixed cost that can be renegotiated to achieve savings. Fuel costs and reactive maintenance vary with activity levels, while inflation indexation is a pricing mechanism rather than a cost itself. CIPS advises buyers to focus on fixed-cost elements when seeking sustainable cost reductions, as changes deliver predictable and ongoing savings.

Negotiation doesn't end after the contract is awarded. The needs for negotiation can arise in any post-award stages. For example, at supplier development and relationship management stage,improvement in supplier capability, capacity, and product/service range can be negotiated. Negotiations with long-term strategic critical suppliers should be carried out in a partnering style, with a win-win starting point assumed.

In some sectors such as transport, utilities and infrastructure, tenderers may 'bid low' or even make a loss to win major contracts with a view to negotiating lucrative changes, variations and 'add-ons' over the life of the contract when the supplier is bedded in and the buyer is in the weaker position to push back or challenge. Even in less complex contract, it is very likely that there will be a need to negotiate with that supplier again after the awarding of the contract.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Negotiations do not end at the meeting; they continue through reflection, documentation, and post-negotiation review. Best practice involves assessing whether objectives were met, capturing lessons learned, and ensuring written confirmation of terms. Without this, misunderstandings or missed improvements can occur. Reflection allows organisations to continuously strengthen negotiation strategies and build learning cycles.

Direct costs are those costs of a product/service directly attributable/traceable to its production. Examples of direct costs including the following:

Materials and services bought-in: In steel manufacturer, raw materials are iron ores, scrap metal, coals, etc

Labour or wages: money paid to staff for the work involved in producing the product.

Other expenses: other charges incurred that can be specifically attributed to a particular product, batch or service

The analysis of cost into fixed and variable enables organisations to determine their break-even point (BE) - the point where total revenue from sales and total cost exactly balance. All costs need to be covered by sale revenue in order for a company to make a profit. If you know your fixed costs and your variable costs then you can work out the minimum quantity of goods or services you need to sell to break even. Break even point is measured in volume and can be worked out graphically or via formulae:

Price - Variable costs = Contribution

Break even point (volume) = Fixed expenses/Contribution margin per unit

In this scenario, the break even point (Q) is: 270,000/(180-126) = 5,000

To make a profit, the supplier needs to sell more than 5,000 units per month.

The BE point is thus an important determinant of flexibility of pricing for suppliers. Before BE is achieved there will be much greater reluctance to offer price concessions to customers than after BE is achieved.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Macroeconomic factors like inflation, interest rates, and currency fluctuations can significantly affect pricing and contractual terms. Buyers and suppliers must account for these factors during negotiations, particularly in long-term or high-value contracts.

The bargaining power of buyers increases when the buyer is large relative to the supplier. A large buyer can leverage its size to negotiate more favorable terms due to its significant impact on the supplier's business. CIPS notes that a buyer’s size and purchasing volume are key factors that enhance its negotiating power in buyer-supplier relationships.

At the first stage of CIPS Procurement and Supply Cycle (Understand need and develop a high-level specification), procurement professional mainly negotiate with internal stakeholders. They have a duty to proportionately and constructively challenge specification if there's genuine doubt over the need or how the need is expressed. This is called demand management. Their first duty is to the organisation's treasury, not to functional managers.

Demand management including: negotiation/challenge between procurement and internal stakeholders over the need/requirement/specification. Remember that in any process or product, the greatest opportunity for cost reduction is at the design stage.

A negotiation performance review should focus on measuring outcomes against objectives, lessons learned, and evaluation of negotiator effectiveness. This ensures continual improvement and supports organisational learning. Pricing structures and alternative suppliers may have been reviewed earlier, but are not part of post-performance reflection. Travel expenses are irrelevant to negotiation learning. By focusing on objectives, learning, and performance, organisations embed best practice and prepare stronger strategies for future negotiations.

Emotional Quotient is the set of skills that enables us to make our way in a complex world - the personal, social and survival aspects of overall intelligence, the elusive common sense and sensitivity that are essential to effective daily functioning. It has to do with the ability to read the political and social environment, and landscape them; to intuitively grasp what others want and need; what strengths and weaknesses are; to remain unruffled by stress; and to be engaging. The kind of person others want to be around and follow.

EQ seeks to measure emotional intelligence and is centred on abilities such as the following:

- Identifying emotions

- Evaluating how others feel

- Controlling one's own emotions

- Perceiving how others feel

- Using emotions to facilitate social communication

- Relating to others

On the other hand, cognitive ability is defined as a general mental capability involving reasoning, problem solving, planning, abstract thinking, complex idea comprehension, and learning from experience (Gottfredson, 1997).

LO 3, AC 3.3

Microeconomic factors concern the conditions specific to suppliers, buyers, and markets — such as supplier communications, annual reports, and industry-specific data. These provide insight into cost structures, capacity, and competitive positioning. Macroeconomic factors, by contrast, include inflation indices (RPI), financial market trends, or global commodity prices. Distinguishing between micro and macro sources allows negotiators to build more precise intelligence for supplier discussions.

Inbreak-even analysis,contributionrefers to the amount from sales revenue that exceedsvariable costs, which then contributes to coveringfixed costsand ultimately generating profit. Understanding this concept enables buyers to better analyze supplier pricing and negotiate more effectively. For example, if a product is priced significantly above its variable cost, there may be room fordiscounts or added value, as the supplier is still contributing toward fixed costs.

Published market indices are a source of macroeconomic data, as they reflect broader economic trends and provide insights into the overall market environment, which is essential for globalexpansion planning. Macroeconomic analysis focuses on high-level economic indicators, as recommended in CIPS’s guidelines on sourcing macroeconomic data.

An adversarial relationship in purchasing and supply arises when identical or equivalent good or services are available from competing suppliers and buyers/sellers are trying to gain an advantage over each other. Low levels of trust are characteristic of adversarial relationships. The outcome when two organisations with adversarial negotiate is most likely to be win-lose.

In a win-lose outcome, tactics often involve lowering the other party’s resistance point (1) and convincing them that the offer is the best possible (2). These strategies are designed to maximize advantage for one party at the expense of the other, fitting with CIPS’s win-lose negotiation techniques.

Below are some examples of cost input that can be analysed in PPCA process:

- Material costs

- Process and labour costs

- Employment costs

- Overhead costs

- Distribution costs

- Depreciation on equipment

- Profit

If you want to learn more on PPCA, you can study from OGC document here:

LO 2, AC 2.1

A key consideration when seeking to negotiate prices is to establish what proportion of the spend is addressable by procurement action such as negotiation. Addressability of spend is influenceable through negotiations or application of other saving effort or leverage with suppliers.

LO 2, AC 2.1

According toMendelow’s Matrix, stakeholders withhigh interest but low powershould be keptinformed. Their interest means they care about the negotiation's outcome, but their low power means they can't significantly influence it. Keeping them informed avoids alienation and ensures smoother implementation of negotiated agreements.

“Stakeholders with high interest but low power should be managed by keeping them informed. They may become powerful advocates or opponents in the future, so engaging them is a strategic approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Stakeholder Management in Commercial Negotiations)

Hearing is passive but listening is active, and some people need to learn to be a good, attentive listener. The following rules of attentive listening will help you to become a successful negotiator:

• Be motivated to listen

• Be alert to non-verbal cues

• Do not interrupt the other party when they are speaking

• Fight off distractions

• Write everything down

• Listen with a goal in mind

• Give the other party your undivided attention

• React to the message, not the person

LO 3, AC 3.3

The supplier's perspective model has two axes: Spend value and Attractiveness:

Chart, table Description automatically generated

Exploit is the quadrant where the buyer has high spend but low attractiveness. Overarching supplier objective would be: "Milk this customer and charge a high price to compensate for all the pain they put us through".

The buyer should increase its attractiveness to raise the position to Core customer. To do this, a buyer may:

- Simplify procurement processes

- Simplify contracting processes

- Use clear and concise documentation

- Eliminate onerous supplier terms and conditions

- Make the payment on time

- Use transparent processes

- Promote ethical behaviours

LO 1, AC 1.4

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Commercial situations often demand a distributive bargaining approach, if the 'pie' is inherently of a fixed size. In this case, any conflicts must be resolved by sharing it.

In win-lose approach, a negotiator wants to maximise the value obtained in a single deal, the relationship with the other party is not important. Therefore, a strong party may win more than 50% of the metaphorical 'pie'.

It should not be assumed that win-win can be applied to all commercial negotiations, or that win-lose approaches are inherently inferior.

The assumption is false, because when a procurement professional negotiates on behalf of his employer, he brings the power of his organisation (its brand, reputation and purchasing spend) as well his own personal power (that which is embedded within him) to the negotiation.

From a negotiation perspective, both organisational and personal power have the ability to influence the behaviours of other or the cause of event. This power is clearly core to negotiation, and of enormous important in seeking to achieve the objectives.

Supplier bargaining power is stronger when there arefew suppliers,low volume requirementsfrom buyers, and when suppliers possessunique capabilities or technology(like specialized machinery). These conditions reduce buyer leverage and increase supplier influence.

Trust develops when organisations consistently deliver on commitments—meeting deadlines, respecting terms, and fulfilling promises. While audits, contract management, and data gathering support oversight, they do not in themselves build trust. In collaborative negotiations, reliability becomes the foundation of long-term partnerships, reducing the need for constant monitoring. CIPS highlights that trust is fragile and must be reinforced through transparency, consistent behaviour, and alignment of actions with words. This credibility is more persuasive than any formal monitoring.

Other stakeholders, including directors, IT, and finance departments, often have an interest in procurement negotiations, particularly when the contract impacts strategic objectives, IT infrastructure, or organizational operations. This broader stakeholder involvement aligns with CIPS’s emphasis on inclusive stakeholder management in procurement to ensure well-rounded decision-making.

Mark-upis calculated as:

Mark-up %=(ProfitCost)×100\text{Mark-up \%} = \left( \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Cost}} \right) \times 100Mark-up %=(CostProfit​)×100

In this case:

Profit = $240 - $160 = $80

Cost = $160

Mark-up = (80 / 160) × 100 =50%

“Understanding mark-up percentages helps in assessing supplier pricing behaviour and negotiating realistic margins.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models and Profit Margins)

Framing and re-framing (C) and Anchoring (E) are powerful influencing techniques:

Framing and re-framing (C): This technique shapes how information is presented to make specific aspects more compelling or relevant.

Anchoring (E): Anchoring sets an initial reference point, which influences how subsequent information is perceived.

These techniques help negotiators control the flow and focus of discussions, aligning with CIPS recommendations for strategic influence in negotiations.

The typical stages of commercial negotiation are Preparing, opening, bargaining, agreement, and closure. This sequence facilitates a structured approach where negotiators prepare strategies, initiate discussions, engage in bargaining, reach agreements, and formally close the negotiation. This structure is emphasized in CIPS materials as essential for achieving a balanced negotiation process.

Macroeconomic indicators are statistics or data readings that reflect the economic circumstances of a particular country, region or sector. They are used by analysts and governments to assess the current and future health of the economy and financial markets.

Macroeconomic indicators will vary in their meaning and the impact that they have on the economy, but broadly speaking there are two main types of indicator.

- Leading indicators, which forecast where an economy might be heading. They are often used by governments to implement policies because they represent the first phase of a new economic cycle. These include the yield curve, interest rates and share prices.

- Lagging indicators, which reflect an economy’s historical performance and only change after a trend has been established. They are used to confirm a trend is underway. These include gross domestic product (GDP), inflation and employment figures.

There is also the category of coincident indicators, but these are generally grouped in with lagging indicators as they either happen at the same time or after an economic shift.

The best macroeconomic indicator to watch will heavily depend on your personal preferences, what positions you are taking and which country your portfolio is focused on. However, there are some very common indicators that most traders and investors will keep an eye on.

For simplicity’s sake, we have split these out into leading and lagging indicators.

Top leading indicators:

1. The stock market

2. House prices

3. Bond yields

4. Production and manufacturing statistics

5. Retail sales

6. Interest rates

Top lagging indicators:

1. GDP growth rates

2. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and inflation

3. Currency strength and stability

4. Labour market statistics

5. Commodity prices

A procurement professional may find stock market data from the security exchange, while most lagging indicators (such as GDP, CPI, unemployment rate, currency and inflation rate, etc) can be found from government statistics data.

Signs of trust in business relationships

• Mutually agreed and managed objectives

• Sharing information

• Managing conflict through joint problem solving

• On time delivery of products and services

• High-performance teams that feel empowered to get the job done

• Supplier welcomes opportunity to innovate

• Both parties share ideas and insight

• Clear criteria for decision making

LO 1, AC 1.4

Distributive bargainingfocuses onmaximizing one's own gainat the expense of the other party. Common tactics includewithholding informationandcoercion. It is typically used in zero-sum negotiations where parties compete over a fixed value.

“Tactics in distributive bargaining include withholding key information, making extreme opening offers, and using pressure to achieve concessions. These are aimed at maximizing individual outcomes.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.5 - Tactics of Distributive Bargaining)

Variable costsare expenses that change in proportion to business activity or production volume.Raw materialsanddelivery costsdirectly increase as more products are produced. In contrast,rentandinsuranceare fixed costs that remain constant regardless of output levels.

“Variable costs are directly linked to production output. Raw materials and logistics (e.g., delivery) scale with order volume, impacting supplier pricing and buyer negotiations.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Direct and Variable Cost Classifications)

Understanding the key approaches to commercial negotiation—such as adversarial, integrative, collaborative, or accommodative—is fundamental to achieving successful outcomes. CIPS emphasises that negotiators must be able to select and apply the correct approach based on factors such as power balance, relationship importance, risk, and objectives. While understanding conflict, stakeholder power, and sourcing stages all support negotiation effectiveness, they are secondary to choosing the right negotiation approach itself. Without this core understanding, negotiators risk misalignment between strategy and context, leading to suboptimal or failed outcomes.

Supplier conditioning is the process of influencing a supplier or suppliers to behave in a certain way, or to accept certain circumstances. Within a negotiation, the buyer needs to make sure that the supplier has a number of messages in mind, about the outcomes that the buyer needs to achieve and about the shared sense of purpose that buying organisation has in achieving these outcomes.

Supplier appraisal is a process of evaluating a supplier's ability to carry out a contract in term of quality, delivery, price and other contributing factors.

Supplier positioning is the process of classifying spend with a supplier in terms of the profit potential and supply risk and assists in prioritising categories of spend and developing the right strategy.

Supplier selection is the process of selecting a supplier to acquire the necessary materials to support the outputs of organisations. Selection of the best and/or the most suitable suppliers is based on assessing supplier capabilities (Shih et al., 2004).

Closed questions are useful for verifying facts, as they prompt specific, concise responses. These questions allow the negotiator to confirm details without ambiguity, which is crucial for clarity in negotiation settings, as highlighted in CIPS’s guidelines on questioning techniques.

Win–lose strategies focus on gaining advantage at the other party’s expense. Forcing them to lower their resistance point or persuading them the deal is their best option are classic distributive tactics. Empathy, compromise, and creativity belong to integrative approaches aimed at mutual benefit. Recognising these distinctions ensures negotiators adopt the right strategy for the relationship type and context.

There are many factors that can influence the balance of power in a negotiation. These factors are classified into 3 levels:

- Macro level: STEEPLE framework: social, technological, economic, environment, political, legal and ethical

- Micro level: Porter's five forces:

Diagram Description automatically generated

- One-to-one buyer-supplier dynamics.

The question asks about the micro factors that increases buyer's bargaining power. Among 5 answers, only 2 are likely to increase buyer's power:

- JCB's switching costs are low: Buyer may easily switch its suppliers anytime

- These components are highly standardised: The products are not different any more, buyer may choose to buy from any supplier available.

Other answers cannot be correct because:

- Suppliers are more concentrated than buyer: Suppliers are forming oligopoly market, their bargaining power tend to be greater.

- Eruption of epidemic in supply market: this is a macro factor. Eruption of epidemic may cause factories closed and disruptions on supply chain.

- Buyers purchase in small volumes: Buyer will be seen as less potential to suppliers. Buying organisation may have difficulties to deal better price with suppliers.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Variable costs change in proportion to production volume, such as packaging, raw materials, and delivery. Fixed costs (rent, insurance, loan repayments) remain constant regardless of output. Recognising the difference is crucial when negotiating supplier pricing, as variable costs are often more open to tradeable adjustments (e.g., bulk discounts). Buyers who understand cost structures can challenge inflated fixed allocations or negotiate on genuine variable elements. This knowledge is vital in price breakdown discussions and in cost-modelling negotiations.

Open questions (“how/why/what…”) encourage the other party to share information, interests, and constraints, supporting rapport, listening, and exploration—key to persuasive dialogue and integrative outcomes. Closed questions check facts; open ones surface interests.

There are nine commonly used influence tactic:

1. Rational persuasion includes using facts, data, and logical arguments to try to convince others that your point of view is the best alternative. This is the most commonly applied influence tactic.

2. Legitimating

3. Personal appeals

4. Exchange

5. Ingratiation

6. Pressure refers to exerting undue influence on someone to do what you want or else something undesirable will occur.

7. Coalitions refer to a group of individuals working together toward a common goal to influence others.

8. Inspirational appeals

9. Consultation refers to the influence agent’s asking others for help in directly influencing or planning to influence another person or group.

In the scenario, there is a problem with demand forecasting and supply chain planning in Leitax. The new Supply chain director invites the stakeholders to a meeting to find the solution. She is using coalition tactics.

A perfectly competitive market is one with the following features:

- There are many firms producing identical or very similar (homogeneous) goods or services

- There are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market - anyone can enter or leave easily

- Both producers and customers have perfect knowledge of the market place, prices, costs of production and influences on demand and supply

Under these conditions, the price and quantity will always tend toward equilibrium as any producer that sets a price above equilibrium will not sell anything at all, and any producer that sets a price below a equilibrium will obtain 100% market share in theory. The demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. In a perfectly competitive market, it is difficult to increase profits through pricing, and suppliers instead must focus on their cost structure. As these conditions imply, there are few if any examples of perfectly competitive market.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Planning and preparation involve analysing bargaining power, understanding the counterpart’s needs, and defining the constituents (parties involved). Questioning and concessions come later during bargaining. Narrowing solutions occurs during closure. Proper planning ensures negotiators enter with clear objectives, strategies, and knowledge, reducing surprises. CIPS highlights preparation as the most critical determinant of negotiation success, aligning with the saying: “Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.”

Monopolistic competition exists in market where there are many competing producers but they will try to use product differentiation. Although their products may be very similar, their ability to differentiate means that they can act as monopolies in short run, irrespective of the actions of their competitors.

In perfect competition, there are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market. In monopolistic competition, there tend to be fewer barriers to entry or exit in these markets than inoligopolistic markets, but it doesn't mean that there are absolutely no barriers to entry in monopolistic competition.

In perfect competition, the demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. Otherwise, in monopolistic competition market, the demand curve will have normal downward slope.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Market pricing sets prices according to consumer demand and willingness to pay, ensuring competitiveness. Skimming sets high prices at launch to maximise early profit, penetration uses low prices to enter markets, and premium pricing positions products as luxury with high margins. Market pricing balances supplier costs with customer value perception, making it a common approach in competitive industries.

CIPS stresses that clear verbal confirmation is required for agreements. Non-verbal signals (smiles, nods, handshakes) can indicate politeness or ambiguity but do not constitute binding agreement. Assuming agreement risks later disputes or misunderstandings. Skilled negotiators ensure closure by explicitly summarising agreed terms and documenting them. Non-verbal communication is supportive, not decisive, in contract negotiation contexts.

By removing the requirement for named personnel, CDL could allow the supplier flexibility in allocating equally competent but possibly less expensive staff. This tradeable does not compromise on quality but helps control costs.

Open questions begin with “how,” “what,” “why,” etc., and are designed to encourage detailed responses. The supplier’s questions are open-ended and aim to gather comprehensive feedback, which can inform better mutual understanding and potential deal improvements.

The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is an introspective self-report questionnaire indicating differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions. MBTI indicates personality preferences in four dimensions.

The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) is a conflict style inventory, which is a tool developed to measure an individual's response to conflict situations.

Mill's RESPECT mnemonic is set out by Harry A. Mills which describes seven steps to agreements

An intelligence quotient (IQ) is a total score derived from a set of standardized tests designed to assess human intelligence.

In order to estimate the gap and the progress towards desired level of support, a stakeholder support scale can be used by the procurement internally. The support level scale measures stakeholder commitment. Current support level for the procurement/negotiation objectives should be gained from engagement with key stakeholders. The following is an example of stakeholder support level scale:

LO 1, AC 1.1

Integrative negotiation focuses on collaboration, transparency, and the pursuit of shared benefits. It emphasizes mutual problem-solving and long-term value creation rather than short-term wins.